Radio-carpal wrist MR arthrography: comparison of ultrasound with fluoroscopy and palpation-guided injections.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ultrasound- (US), fluoroscopy- (FL), and palpation-guided contrast injection techniques used for dorsal radio-carpal wrist MRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic wrist pain were randomized as to which injection technique they underwent into three groups of 50 participants. Dorsal radio-carpal contrast injection was performed under US, FL guidance (one radiologist for each), or palpation guidance by an orthopedic surgeon. The three techniques were compared by procedure time, success rate, number of attempts needed, frequency and grade of extravasation, joint distension, and MRA image quality. Additionally, any change from baseline wrist pain was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at five time points (immediately, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week) after injection. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients (83 males and 67 females; mean age 29 ± 6.5 years) were included. Success rates for US- and FL-guided injections were 100%, while palpation-guided approach was significantly less successful (72%) (P = 0.02) with significantly more frequent extravasation (56%)(P < 0.001). US guidance was the least time-consuming (6.5 ± 1.6 min) compared to FL guidance (12.5 ± 1.9 min) and palpation guidance (8 ± 1.2 min) (all P < 0.001). The mean number of joint puncture attempts was significantly lower with imaging-guided techniques (1.1 ± 0.24 and 1.2 ± 0.4 for US and FL, P = 0.23) compared to palpation-guided one (1.6 ± 0.8) (P = 0.007). The largest increases in baseline-pain were 8-h post-injection, and US guidance was the least painful at all-time points (all P < 0.05). Joint distension and image quality were significantly better with imaging-guided techniques (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: US-guided radio-carpal injection is a less time-consuming, more tolerable, and successful radiation-free method when compared to FL guidance. Palpation-guided injections require multiple attempts to enter the joint with high failure rates and frequent extravasation.

MR arthrography versus conventional MRI and diagnostic arthroscope in patients with chronic wrist pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of direct wrist MR arthrography (MRA) compared to conventional MRI in diagnosis of different pathologic entities causing chronic wrist pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 37 consecutive patients 22 males and 15 females, with age range from 16 to 49 years "mean age 28 years" complaining of unexplained chronic wrist pain were prospectively examined by using MRI and MRA with arthroscopic correlation in 25 of them. Findings were divided into 5 main groups of lesions including triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions, ligamentous injuries, osseous lesions, tendon pathology and ganglion. RESULTS: MRA picked up more ligamentous injuries and triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions that couldn`t be detected on MRI study while both were equal in detection of other types of lesions. TFCC lesions were the most common pathologic findings in both MRI and MRA. Arthroscopic correlation in 25 suspected TFCC lesions (clinically, radiologically or both) revealed that the sensitivity / specificity / accuracy of MRI and MRA were 87.5% / 100% / 96% and 100% / 100% / 100% respectively for central lesions while were 71.4% / 81.3% / 76% and 100% / 90.9% / 96% respectively For peripheral lesions. Extra-capsular lesions, like tenosynovitis and fracture hook of hamate couldn`t be confirmed arthroscopically. CONCLUSION: MRA can replace both MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy in detecting causes of chronic wrist pain.