Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 20(1): 97-100, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19266834

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Several factors have been incriminated in the etiologies of critical incidents: shortages in organizing rules, anesthesia technique, patient environment, human factor, team work and communication. This is the third follow up report describing our performance during the last five years (2003-2008). The possible incriminating causes were identified with the objective of avoiding such eventualities and consequently providing a better patient outcome. PATIENTS & METHODS: The computerized database and the medical records of critical incidents reports in our Department during the period of 2003-2008 were reviewed on case-by-case basis. Seventy reported incidents were discussed in the Department's Morbidity & Mortality Meetings (MMM). Incidents were classified as per possible incriminating causes: pulmonary, cardiovascular, central nervous system, metabolic, inadvertent drug injection, communicating failure, equipment failure and miscellaneous causes. RESULTS: Most of the critical incidents reports occurred during maintenance of anesthesia, followed next by during induction and next by same operative day later in the ward. The majority of cases were respiratory events (29 cases), followed by communication failure (12 cases), failure of equipment (9 cases) and inadvertent drug injection (4 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory events, human errors, team communication and equipment failures, continue to be the leading causes of critical incidents. Critical incidents are apt to occur so long as the human factor is involved. Vigilance in operational efficiency and the scrutiny in drug administration, supervision and training should be closely monitored in order to minimize critical incident reports.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Emergencies , Medical Errors , Communication , Equipment Failure , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Time Factors
2.
Saudi J Anaesth ; 3(2): 48-52, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20532102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication following general anesthesia. Different regimens have been described for the treatment of PONV with few that mention the prevention of it. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the effect of preloading with either crystalloids or colloids on the incidence of PONV following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), under general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was carried out on 80 patients who underwent LC. The patients were divided into four groups (each 20 patients), to receive preloading of intravenous fluid, as follows: Group 1 received, 10 ml/kg of low-MW tetrastarch in saline (Voluven), group 2 received, 10 ml/kg medium-MW pentastarch in saline (Pentaspan), group 3, received 10 ml/kg of high-MW heta-starch in saline (Hespan), and group 4, received 10 ml/kg Lactated Ringer's, and this was considered as the control group. All patients received the standard anesthetic technique. The incidence of PONV was recorded, two and 24 hours following surgery. The need for antiemetics and/or analgesics was recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: The highest incidence of PONV was in group 3 (75% of the patients) compared to the other three groups. Also the same trend was found with regard to the number of patients who needed antiemetic therapy. It was the highest incidence in group 3 (70%), followed by group 2 (60%), and then group 1(35%), and the least one was in the control group (25%). CONCLUSION: Intravascular volume deficits may be a factor in PONV and preloading with crystalloids showed a lower incidence of PONV.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...