Antibiotics efficacy in clinical and microbiological cure of uncomplicated urinary tract infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Fosfomycin has been used more frequently in managing uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to decreased compliance and increased multidrug-resistant bacteria. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of Fosfomycin compared to Nitrofurantoin, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and Ciprofloxacin in terms of clinical and microbiological cure alongside with other measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We included randomized control trials (RCTs) with uncomplicated UTI patients who received Fosfomycin, Nitrofurantoin, TMP-SMX, or Ciprofloxacin and reported the clinical or microbiological cure. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool to assess the included studies' quality. R-software was used for all statistical analysis. We ranked all antibiotics using the netrank function which yielded P scores. Frequentist network meta-analysis was used to assess the efficacy of all outcomes. RESULTS: We included 13 RCTs with a total number of 3856 patients that showed Fosfomycin ranked the highest among the other antibiotics with respect to clinical cure (P-score = 0.99) and microbiological cure (P-score = 0.99) while Ciprofloxacin ranked the lowest (P-score = 0.11 and 0.02, respectively). Moreover, Ciprofloxacin yielded the highest relapse rate (P-score = 1), whereas TMP-SMX had the lowest relapse rate (P-score = 0.07). As for the adverse events, Ciprofloxacin demonstrated the highest adverse events as opposed to Fosfomycin (P-score = 0.98 and 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Fosfomycin is the most effective antibiotic in treating uncomplicated UTIs with respect to clinical cure, microbiological cure, and adverse events profile.

Active gas aspiration in reducing pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a common issue following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine if active gas aspiration is more effective than passive gas aspiration in reducing postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. METHODOLOGY: The study conducted a systematic search of various databases, including Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Ovid. It also searched trial registries and reference lists of included studies, with no date restrictions but limited to English language, up to December 21, 2022. The study included all randomized clinical trials that had documented elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure and reported at least one relevant outcome. Articles that included subdiaphragmatic drain, intraperitoneal normal saline infusion, or pulmonary recruitment maneuver were excluded from the analysis. Two reviewers independently and in duplicate assessed the eligibility of studies and extracted data. The study reported findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias of the included trials was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The study used a random-effects model to pool data. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 randomized clinical trials with 367 participants and found that active gas aspiration resulted in significantly lower residual gas volume and total analgesia requirements compared to passive gas aspiration. Active gas aspiration also led to significantly lower shoulder pain scores at 24 h postoperatively. However, no significant differences were observed in hospital stay duration or abdominal pain scores. CONCLUSION: The study found that active gas aspiration can be effective in reducing postoperative shoulder pain and analgesic requirements after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has important implications for patient care and healthcare costs. Importantly, this intervention does not impose any additional time or financial burden. However, further research is needed to evaluate its impact on other laparoscopic procedures.

Comparison of acetaminophen, ketamine, or ketorolac versus morphine in the treatment of acute renal colic: A network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal colic is a disease in which a calculus obstructs the urinary tract, resulting in severe pain do ureteric peristaltic movements. Other symptoms, such as hematuria, nausea, and vomiting, may accompany the pain. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different analgesic agents for the treatment of acute renal colic. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different analgesic agents, either alone or in combination were included. For the management of acute renal colic, analgesic agents were selected based on the current standard medical practice. The medications included intravenous acetaminophen, ketamine, ketorolac, and morphine. This study sought to evaluate the pain score on the visual analog scale (VAS) at 15, 30, and 60 min; adverse events; and the utilization of rescue therapy. The efficacy of different analgesic agents was explored through a frequentist network meta-analysis using the Netmeta statistical package in R software. All treatments were ranked using the Netrank function, yielding P-scores. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were deemed eligible. As per the P-scores, acetaminophen was the most effective in reducing pain score at 15 min (P-score = 0.74). Ketorolac was the most effective in reducing the pain score at 30 and 60 min (P-score = 0.84) (P-score = 0.99), whereas morphine was the least effective (P-score = 0.07). Moreover, morphine was correlated with the highest odds of adverse events after treatment (P-score = 0.89). Morphine was the most frequently required rescue therapy in cases of suboptimal pain relief (P-score = 0.96). CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis demonstrated that ketorolac and acetaminophen were the most effective analgesic agents according to the pain score. Morphine showed the highest adverse event profile and the highest rate at which rescue therapy was required for the management of acute renal colic.

Comparison of temporalis muscle fascia and cartilage grafts for primary type 1 tympanoplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of temporalis fascia (TF) with cartilage grafts for primary type 1 tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media (COM) patients. METHODS: Computerized search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TF and cartilage grafts in individuals with non-cholesteatoma COM and intact ossicles requiring type 1 tympanoplasty. Primary outcomes were graft success and hearing improvement, measured by the air-bone gap (ABG) closure. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs that enrolled 1273 participants were found eligible. Data were reported at follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 24 months. The pooled effect estimate revealed a higher and statistically significant graft success favoring cartilage grafts at 12 months (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.33-3.78) and 24 months (OR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.18-7.43). There was no significant difference between both grafts in post-operative ABG closure across all follow-up periods (6 weeks to 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TF, primary type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty offers better graft uptake rates and comparable postoperative hearing outcomes for COM patients.

Management of postoperative cerebral vasospasm in skull base surgeries: A systematic review of case reports and series.

Background: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the management of postoperative vasospasm after skull base surgeries. This phenomenon is rare but can be of serious sequelae. Methods: Medline, Embase, and PubMed Central were searched, along with examining the references of the included studies. Only case reports and series that reported vasospasm following a skull base pathology were incorporated. Cases with pathologies other than skull base, subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm, and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome were excluded from the study. Quantitative data were presented as mean (Standard Deviation) or median (range), accordingly, while qualitative data were presented as frequency (percentage). Chi- square test and one-way analysis of variance were used to assess for any association between the different factors and patient outcomes. Results: We had a total of 42 cases extracted from the literature. The mean age was 40.1 (±16.1) with approximately equal males and females (19 [45.2%] and 23 [54.8%], respectively). The time to develop vasospasm after the surgery was 7 days (±3.7). Most of the cases were diagnosed by either angiogram or magnetic resonance angiography. Seventeen of the 42 patients had pituitary adenoma as the pathology. Anterior circulation was nearly affected in all patients. For management, most patients received pharmacological with supportive management. Twenty-three patients had an incomplete recovery as a result of vasospasm. Conclusion: Vasospasm following skull base operations can affect males and females, and most patients in this review were middle-aged adults. The outcome of patients varies; however, most patients did not achieve a full recovery. There was no correlation between any factors and the outcome.

Public awareness about arthritic diseases in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Raising public knowledge and perception would have a discernible impact on providing optimal care and reducing the burden of arthritis in the community. This systematic review aimed to identify the public knowledge about the common arthritic conditions in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL for relevant literature. We included questionnaire-based cross-sectional studies performed in Saudi Arabia assessing the public perception of general knowledge, causes/risk factors, signs/symptoms, and relieving/management measures of the common arthritic conditions including osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and gout. The meta-analysis was performed on outcomes reported in ≥ two studies utilizing a random-effects model RESULTS: Ten studies representing 6703 participants were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. A total of 35 questions were feasible to be included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis estimated that 83.51%, 54.51%, and 80.42% have ever hearsd or read about OA, RA, and gout. Joint pain and swelling were perceived to be the main signs/symptoms of OA, RA, and gout. 7.5% think OA is predisposed by genetics while only 33.6% think the same of RA. RA knowledge in general is suboptimum. Only 27.04% think medications can help in the management of gout. CONCLUSION: The Saudi public perception of the general knowledge and causes/risk factors of the most common arthritic conditions was acceptable. The level of knowledge about other aspects of the common arthritic conditions is still limited and needs to be addressed by future educational interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022345274.

Pharmacological Features of 18ß-Glycyrrhetinic Acid: A Pentacyclic Triterpenoid of Therapeutic Potential.

Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (belonging to the family Leguminosae), commonly known as Licorice, is a popular medicinal plant that has been used in traditional medicine worldwide for its ethnopharmacological efficacy in treating several ailments. Natural herbal substances with strong biological activity have recently received much attention. The main metabolite of glycyrrhizic acid is 18ß-glycyrrhetinic acid (18ßGA), a pentacyclic triterpene. A major active plant component derived from licorice root, 18ßGA has sparked a lot of attention due to its pharmacological properties. The current review thoroughly examines the literature on 18ßGA, a major active plant component obtained from Glycyrrhiza glabra L. The current work provides insight into the pharmacological activities of 18ßGA and the potential mechanisms of action involved. The plant contains a variety of phytoconstituents such as 18ßGA, which has a variety of biological effects including antiasthmatic, hepatoprotective, anticancer, nephroprotective, antidiabetic, antileishmanial, antiviral, antibacterial, antipsoriasis, antiosteoporosis, antiepileptic, antiarrhythmic, and anti-inflammatory, and is also useful in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension, antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia, and cerebral ischemia. This review examines research on the pharmacological characteristics of 18ßGA throughout recent decades to demonstrate its therapeutic potential and any gaps that may exist, presenting possibilities for future drug research and development.

Comparison of immobilization periods following open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. INTRODUCTION: The use of volar locking plate (VLP) in the fixation of fracture fragments promised a new era in the management of distal radius fracture (DRF). PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To compare the patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, pain, and adverse events between the different periods of immobilization following open reduction and internal fixation of DRFs with VLP. METHODS: We searched Medline/Pubmed, Web of Science, Ovid, and CINAHL. The inclusion criteria was randomized controlled trials that compared different immobilization periods after open reduction and internal fixation of DRFs with VLP. The last search was performed on 2 June 2020. The different immobilization periods were divided into the following 3 groups: ≤1-week group, 2-3-week group, and 5-6-week group. RESULTS: Seven eligible randomized controlled trials provided data on 509 patients. We found that compared to 5-6-week group, ≤1-week and 2-3-week groups showed a reduction in overall Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation score (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.22, P < .001; SMD = -0.69, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.41, P < .001, respectively). We also found that there were improvements in the other patient-reported outcomes including overall Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and pain; and functional outcomes including overall grip strength and range of motion measures in favor of ≤1-week and 2-3-week groups. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that compared to immobilization for 5 to 6 weeks after DRF repair, immobilization for ≤1 week or 2-3 weeks showed improvements in the patients-reported outcomes and functional outcomes. The differences between the 3 immobilization groups may not be clinically important considering the small changes as follow up progresses.

Botulinum toxin type A for lower limb lengthening and deformity correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is the most popular therapeutic agent for muscle relaxation and pain control. Lately, BTX-A injection received great interest as a part of multimodal pain management for lower limb lengthening and deformity correction. This systematic review aimed to determine the role of BTX-A injection in pain management for during lower limb lengthening and/or deformity correction. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the BTX-A injection to placebo for individuals undergoing lower limb lengthening and/or deformity correction. We sought to evaluate the following outcomes: pain on visual analogue scale (VAS), range of motion parameters, average opioid consumption, and adverse events. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to represent continuous outcomes while risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 4 RCTs that enrolled 257 participants (337 limbs) deemed eligible. Adjuvant BTX-A injection showed a significant reduction in post-operative pain compared to placebo (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.04). No difference was found between BTX-A injection and placebo in terms of range of motion parameters, average opioid consumption, or adverse events after surgical limb lengthening and/or deformity correction (RR = 0.77, 95% CI -0.58 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant BTX-A injection conferred a discernible reduction in post-operative pain during surgical limb lengthening and/or deformity without increasing the risk of adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021271580.

Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is considered as one of the most common sport-related musculoskeletal injuries. Double bundle (DB) and single bundle (SB) surgical techniques has been widely adopted for ACL reconstruction. This systematic review aimed to provide updated evidence by comparing the short-term, mid-term, and long-term knee stability and functional outcomes of DB and SB reconstruction techniques. Methods: We searched Medline, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. We have selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DB and SB ACL reconstruction techniques for primary isolated ACL tear. We have assessed the following outcomes: pivot shift test, Lachman test, KT-1000/2000 knee ligament arthrometer, Lysholm knee function score, Tegner activity score, and graft failure. We have used the standardized mean difference (SMD) was to summarize the continuous outcomes while risk ratio (RR) was used to summarize the dichotomous outcomes. Results: A total of 34 RCTs that enrolled 2,992 participants deemed eligible. Overall, DB showed significantly better outcomes in terms of pivot shift test (RR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.75), Lachman test (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95), and KT 1000/2000 arthrometer (SMD = - 0.21, 95% CI - 0.34 to - 0.08). No discernible difference was found between DB and SB techniques in the overall Lysholm score (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI - 0.03 to 0.27), Tegner score (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI - 0.17 to 0.24), or graft failure rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.85). Conclusions: Our review suggests that DB ACL reconstruction technique shows significantly better knee stability and functional outcomes than SB at short-term follow-up. However, both techniques exhibit similar outcomes at mid-term and long-term follow-up. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00718-0.

Non-inferior and more feasible transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in treating overactive bladder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Overactive bladder (OAB) is identified as a urinary urgency accompanied by frequency and nocturia with or without urgency urinary incontinence in the nonexistence of a urinary tract infection or other evident pathologies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or anticholinergic drugs in reducing symptoms and improving the quality of life for OAB patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL, in which we included randomized controlled trials that compared TTNS with anticholinergic drugs or PTNS in treating idiopathic OAB. We evaluated the following outcomes: 3-day voiding diary (voiding frequency/day, daytime micturition frequency/day, nighttime micturition frequency/day, number of urgency episodes/day, number of incontinence episodes/day, and mean voiding volume), symptom bother, health related quality of life (HRQoL), and adverse events. We used 95% as a confidence interval (CI) and p < 0.05. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous outcomes, and the risk ratio (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference comparing TTNS with anticholinergic drugs or PTNS regarding voiding frequency/day (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.32), nighttime micturition frequency/day (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.37), number of urgency episodes/day (SMD = -0.05, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.26), number of incontinence episodes/day (SMD = -0.04, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.25), symptom bother (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.16), HRQoL (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.85), and adverse events (RR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis reveals that there is no statistically significant difference between TTNS versus PTNS or anticholinergic drugs for the nonsurgical management of OAB patients.

Equiosmolar hypertonic saline and mannitol for brain relaxation in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Hypertonic saline (HS) and mannitol are hyperosmolar agents that are usually used to reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) and provide a satisfactory brain relaxation. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of HS and mannitol on brain relaxation intraoperatively in patient undergoing craniotomies for supra-tentorial brain tumors. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. We included randomized control trials that compared equiosmolar HS and mannitol in supratentorial tumors craniotomies and reported at least one of the following outcomes: degree of brain relaxation, ICP, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, perioperative fluid input, urine output, Na+ levels, and K+ levels. We searched Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase using MESH terms and keywords. The bibliographic references of included studies and trial registries were also searched. Results: Seven articles were included. The degree brain of relaxation was comparable across the two groups with slight tendency toward HS (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29; P = 0.08). Mannitol was associated with significantly higher urine output (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.33, 95% CI -1.56--1.10; P < 0.001). Na+ levels were higher in HS group (SMD = 1.47, 95% CI 0.86-2.09; P < 0.001). Mannitol was associated with non-significant decrease in CVP and increase fluid input (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.00-0.85 and SMD = -0.18, 95% CI -0.37-0.02, respectively). Conclusion: Both HS and mannitol are associated with satisfactory brain relaxation with a non-statistically significant tendency for HS to achieve better relaxation scores with mannitol resulting in higher urine output while HS with higher Na+ levels.

Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in Long-Term Care: A Five-Year Prospective Single-Center Study.

Objective: To report the effectiveness of the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in a long-term care (LTC) facility, by analyzing the change in antimicrobial consumption and cost and multidrug resistance (MDR) rates over a 5-year period. Method: A prospective interventional study was conducted at a 106-bed facility (nursing home: 100 beds and an intensive care unit (ICU): 6 beds). The ASP was designed and led by a multidisciplinary team including an infectious disease consultant, two clinical pharmacists, a clinical microbiologist, and an infection control preventionist. Five key performance indicators were monitored: (1) intravenous (IV)-to-oral switch rate, (2) consumption of restricted IV antimicrobials (raw consumption and defined daily doses (DDD) index), (3) cost of restricted IV antimicrobials, (4) antimicrobial sensitivity profiles, and (5) MDR rate among hospital-acquired infections (MDR-HAI). Result: A ∼5.5-fold enhancement of the IV-to-oral switch and a 40% reduction in the overall consumption of restricted IV antimicrobials were observed. Regarding the cost, the cumulative cost saving was estimated as 5.64 million SAR (US$1.50 million). Microbiologically, no significant change in antimicrobial sensitivity profiles was observed; however, a large-size reduction in the MDR-HAI rate was observed, notably in ICU where it declined from 3.22 per 1,000 patient days, in 2015, to 1.14 per 1,000 patient days in 2020. Interestingly, the yearly overall MDR rate was strongly correlated with the level of antimicrobial consumption. Conclusion: The implementation of a multidisciplinary ASP in LTC facilities should be further encouraged, with emphasis on physicians' education and active involvement to enhance the success of the strategy.

Safety of not withholding clopidogrel therapy during the immediate several days pre- and post-trans-urethral resection of prostate (TURP): a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Benign prostatic hypertrophy or hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent urological complain particularly in old-aged individuals. Those patients usually have other risk factors (such as ischemic cardiovascular diseases) for which they might be treated with anti-thrombotic agents chronically. These medicines may induce blood thinning and raise the incidence of hemorrhage. Thus, if those patients needed operative treatment for BPH, they may be at high risk of hemorrhage or its related adverse effects with the usage of anti-thrombotic drugs during the peri-operative time. On the other hand, dis-continuation of these agents can lead to ischemic events in susceptible individuals. Therefore, this research aims to assess the safety of the continuation of using anti-thrombotic agents throughout the peri-operative duration in patients with prostate surgery in form of Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) only for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH). METHODS: Patients' notes were reviewed retrospectively. The entire participants were categorized into two categories. First category was on clopidogrel therapy (CTC) for prolong time and the usage of these agents was carried on throughout the peri-operative period. The second category was not on clopidogrel therapy at all (NCTC). Both of these categories had Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH). A comparison had been conducted between the two categories with regards to: (i) the amount of blood lost intra-operatively (ii) the duration of operation (iii) hematocrit concentration per-operatively (iv) transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) if needed (v) clearance of hematuria postoperatively (vi) secondary hemorrhage and clot retention after discharge. Pearson Chi-square test, Independent sample t test and test for numeric variables were used as appropriate. RESULTS: The study identified 329 patients. One hundred and sixty five participants in the CTC (clopidogrel therapy category) and 164 in the NCTC (non-clopidogrel therapy category). It had been revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the CTC and NCTC regarding: (i) the amount of blood lost intra-operatively (ii) the duration of operation (iii) hematocrit concentration per-operatively (iv) transfused packed red blood cells (packed RBC) if needed (v) clearance of hematuria postoperatively (vi) secondary hemorrhage and clot retention after discharge (P > 0.65). CONCLUSION: The continuation of usage of anti-thrombotic therapy (clopidogrel) during peri-operative period in patients with TURP for BPH is a safe practice. It is not associated with high probability of hemorrhage or PRBC transfusion or other adverse effects.

Short leg cast versus orthotic removable support for the management of pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture (i.e., Pseudo-Jones fracture) is one of the most common foot fractures. The management of pseudo-Jones fractures could be carried out surgically or conservatively. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an update about the efficacy of orthotic removable support compared to short-leg casting for individuals with pseudo-Jones fracture. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical outcomes of orthotic removable support and short-leg cast for adult individuals with a fifth metatarsal base avulsion fracture. We used 95% as a confidence level and P <0.05 as a threshold. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for the continuous outcomes, and the risk ratio (RR) was used for the dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs incorporating 403 individuals out were deemed eligible. There was no significant difference between orthotic removable support and short-leg casting regarding AOFAS score (standardized mean difference (SMD)= 0.31, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.8), pain on VAS score (SMD= -0.08, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.22), VAS-FA score (SMD= 0.22, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.62) EQ-5D VAS score, and non-union rate (RR=0.37, 95% CI 0.05 to 2.74). CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis reveals that there is no difference between orthotic removable support and short-leg casting for the conservative management of individuals sustaining pseudo-Jones fracture.

Public awareness and attitudes toward epilepsy in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Public awareness of epilepsy and attitudes toward people with epilepsy (PWE) largely affect patients' perceived stigma and their quality of life. Educational interventions to increase public awareness of the disease need to target areas of lowest awareness levels to achieve best results. The aim of this review was to identify these areas in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This review was based on PRISMA guidelines. Medline, PsychInfo, Embase, Ovid Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant literature. Inclusion criteria was cross-sectional studies that are done in Saudi Arabia, assess any aspect of epilepsy awareness or attitudes toward PWE, and report outcomes in proportions. Meta-analysis was done on outcomes reported in ≥5 studies utilizing random-effects model. Quality assessment was done using AXIS tool. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. A total of 48 questions' outcomes were reported in ≥3 studies, and 26 of them were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis estimated that 6.4% (CI 4.2-9.7%) of the population think epilepsy is a contagious disease; 90.7% (CI 85.5-94.1%) have heard/read about epilepsy; 53.1% (CI 47.7-58.3%) have witnessed a seizure; 38.6% (CI 24.7-54.7%) think epilepsy is a psychological disorder; 25.2% (CI 16.5-36.7%) think it is caused by spirit possession; 35.1% (CI 22.0-50.8%) were estimated to think it is caused by evil eye (envy); 37.9% (CI 21.9-57.0%) would try to put something inside a seizing patient's mouth to prevent tongue biting; 34.6% (CI 26.9-43.1%) would approve their offspring marrying someone with epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Areas of unsatisfactory awareness levels included etiology of epilepsy and appropriate seizure responses. Attitudes were more negative regarding marriage, children, and employment. These areas need to be properly addressed in future educational interventions.

Influence of aspirin on prevention of colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Aspirin, due to its antineoplastic effects, has been suggested to have chemopreventive effects on colorectal cancer based on recent trials. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an updated evidence about the long-term efficacy of daily aspirin use in the prevention of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We searched Medline/PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of daily aspirin use to placebo in healthy individuals at the time of study entry. The desired outcomes of this review were the incidence of advanced lesions (i.e., adenomas with villous component, adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter, adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, and/or invasive cancer) and colorectal adenomas. RESULTS: A total of 15 articles representing 11 RCTs were included. Overall, the results indicated that aspirin significantly reduced the risk of developing colorectal adenomas but not advanced lesions at 3 years (risk ratio (RR) = 0.84, P < 0.05 and risk ratio = 0.82, P = 0.10, respectively). At 5 years, the risk of advanced lesions but not adenomas was reduced by aspirin (RR = 0.68, P < 0.05 and RR = 0.87, P = 0.22, respectively). Aspirin was not found to have an effect on the risk of advanced lesions or adenomas beyond 5 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, P = 0.07 and HR = 0.99, P = 0.82, respectively). CONCLUSION: Overall, aspirin (particularly high dose) only reduced the risk of advanced lesions up to 5 years.

What Is the Best Option for Treating Venous Leg Ulcer Infection? Is It Systemic or Local Antimicrobials or a Combination of Both? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Study aimed to find out best option (systemic or local antimicrobial or combination of both) for treating venous leg ulcer infection. Patients' files were reviewed retrospectively. Participants were divided into three groups. First group was treated by systemic antibiotics only (SABG). Second group received local antibiotics only (LABG). Third group was treated by combination of both (SLABG). Treatment strategies were compared based on multiple parameters using Pearson chi-squared test & relative risk (RR). 456 participants identified: 153 in SABG, 152 in LABG and 151 in SLABG. It was found that SLABG group was statistically significantly better than other single treatment strategies regarding all parameters (except bacterial resistance): (i) ulcer healing within usual duration (10-14 days) was 2.4 time higher (RR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.84, 3.12), (ii) probability of not recurring ulcer was 2.6 time higher (iii) probability of not getting increased wound size, abscess,cellulites was 5 times higher (iv) probability of not developing septicemia was 40% higher (v) probability of not requiring surgical intervention was 30% higher (vi) fewer patients needed prolonged hospitalization & lower cost was 8 times more likely (vii) patients were 3 times more satisfied during treatment .Probability of bacterial resistance was six times higher with SLABG and 5 times higher with SABG compared to LABG. For RR & CI values for all above parameters, see results below Ultimately, combination of both systemic and local antimicrobials may be best option to treat venous leg ulcer infection with out- weight with emergence of antibiotic-resistance microorganism.

Evaluation of the use of anti-platelet therapy throughout the peri-operative period in patients with femoral neck fracture surgery. A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Fracture neck of femur (hip fracture) is a very common problem among old age group. Such elderly patients usually have some comorbidities for which they may use anti-platelet therapy (such as clopidogrel, aspirin, or others) for long duration (chronic use). These anti-platelet medications might make the blood thin and increase bleeding tendency. So, if these elderly people present with fracture neck of femur requiring surgical intervention, they might be at increased risk of bleeding and other complications if the use of these anti-platelet agents was continued throughout the peri-operative period. OBJECTIVES: This current study aims to find out whether it is safe or not to continue the use of anti-platelet drugs during the peri-operative period in patients with hip fracture surgery. If it is safe and there are no complications, then there is no harm to continue the use of these drugs peri-operatively without any surgical delay. But if it is unsafe and there is increased risk of bleeding or blood transfusion or other complications, then such medications must be stopped peri-operatively. Thus, the medical practice and care will be improved to achieve patient safety. METHODS: It was a retrospective study which reviewed files and notes of patients who had hip fracture surgery. These patients were divided into 2 groups. First group was on long-term anti-platelet treatment (APTG), and the use of these medicines continued during the peri-operative phase. The second group was not on anti-platelet treatment at all (NAPTG). Then, a comparison was done between both groups in terms of the following parameters during the peri-operative (pre- and post-operative) period: (i) intra-operative blood loss, (ii) operative time in minutes (length of surgery), (iii) pre-operative haemoglobin level, (iv) the need for blood transfusion, (v) haematoma formation, (vi) re-operation for any reason, (vii) post-operative wound infection, and (viii) duration in days to achieve complete wound healing post-operatively. So these measures are good parameters to assess bleeding tendency and bleeding risk. Data was collected, and statistical analysis was done using Pearson's chi-squared test and independent sample t test as appropriate. RESULTS: 325 participants were enrolled in the study. There were 163 patients in the APTG (Anti-Platelet Treatment Group) and 162 patients in the NAPTG (Non-Anti-Platelet Treatment Group). It has been found that there was no statistically significant difference between the APTG and NAPTG in terms of these peri-operative parameters: (i) intra-operative blood loss, (ii) operative time in minutes (length of surgery), (iii) pre-operative haemoglobin level, (iv) the need for blood transfusion, (v) haematoma formation, (vi) re-operation for any reason, (vii) post-operative wound infection, and (viii) duration in days to achieve complete wound healing post-operatively (P > 0.650). CONCLUSION: It is safe to continue the use of anti-platelet therapy throughout the peri-operative phase in patients with hip fracture surgery. The continuation of such therapy is not associated with increased risk of bleeding or blood transfusion or other complications in patients who had surgical treatment for femoral neck fracture.

Is abdominal drainage after open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis beneficial or waste of money? A single centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is a medical condition that causes painful inflammation of the appendix. For acute appendicitis, appendectomy is immediately required as any delay may lead to serious complications such as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis with or without localized abscess formation. Patients who had appendectomy for complicated appendicitis are more prone to develop post-operative complications such as peritoneal abscess or wound infection. Sometimes, abdominal drainage is used to reduce these complications. However, the advantage of the abdominal drainage to minimize post-operative complications is not clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of abdominal drainage after open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (perforated appendicitis with localized abscess formation only) can prevent or significantly reduce post-operative complications such as intra-peritoneal abscess formation or wound infection. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, files and notes were reviewed retrospectively for patients who had open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (perforated appendicitis with localized abscess formation only) and who had already been admitted and discharged from the surgical wards of Kerbala medical university/Imam Hussein medical city hospital/Kerbala/Iraq. Patients were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups; drainage and non-drainage groups. The drainage group had intra-abdominal drain inserted after the surgery, while the non-drainage group had no drain placed post-operatively. A comparison between both groups was done in terms of these parameters; (i) the development of post operative intra-peritoneal abscess and or wound infection. (ii) The length and cost of hospital stay. (iii) The mortality outcomes. Statistical analysis was done using Pearson Chi-square test, Independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U Test. RESULTS: Of 227 patients with open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, 114 had received abdominal drain after the surgery. Fifty out of 114 patients (43.9%) with abdominal drainage developed post-operative intra-peritoneal abscess (abdominal or pelvic) while 53 out of 113 patients (46.9%) without drainage developed the same complication (P = 0.65). It was also revealed that for patients with drainage, 42 patients (36.8%) had post-operative wound infection, whereas this number was 38 (33.6%) for patients without drainage (P = 0.61). On the other hand, the patients with drain had significantly longer length of hospital stay (mean length of stay: 4.99 days versus 2.12 days, P < 0.001) and significantly higher cost (median cost per patient: $120 versus $60, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Installation of abdominal drainage after open emergency appendectomy for complicated appendicitis did not bring any considerable advantage in terms of prevention or significant reduction of post-operative intra-peritoneal abscess and wound infection. Rather, it lengthened the hospital stay and doubled the cost of operation.