Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Saudi Dent J ; 36(3): 480-485, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525175

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between different environmental risk factors and the severity of cleft lip with/without palate (CL ± P) and cleft palate (CP) in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional national study, of government hospitals in 10 cities distributed across major regions of Saudi Arabia, from June 2020 to June 2021. All newborns with CL ± P or CP were clinically examined and evaluated for cleft phenotype severity using the LAHSHAL classification system. Various environmental factors were evaluated by interviewing parents using a validated questionnaire. The severity of CL ± P and CP was evaluated in relation to environmental factors. Results: We recruited 174 patients with non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NSOFC); 122 (70.1 %) had CL ± P and 52 (29.9 %) had CP. After adjusting the odds ratios by ordinal regression for CL ± P and logistic regression analysis for CP, environmental factors that significantly increased the severity of CL ± P were family history of NSOFC, maternal illnesses, and maternal medication use (P = 0.02, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]:2.70; P = 0.002, AOR:3.70; and P = 0.03, AOR:2.14, respectively). Folic acid supplementation in the first trimester significantly reduced the severity of CL ± P and CP (P = 0.001, AOR:0.18 and P = 0.001, AOR:0.012, respectively). Conclusion: The severity of CL ± P was affected by some maternal exposures during the 3-month pre-gestation period. Therefore, our results suggest the possibility of controlling the severity of NSOFC.

2.
Saudi Dent J ; 35(3): 207-219, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37091275

ABSTRACT

Background: Non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFC) are among the most common congenital malformations. Several studies have investigated the association between stress and NSOFC; however, they have reported different and heterogeneous results. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to investigate the association between maternal periconceptional stress and non-syndromic orofacial clefts in infants.The research question was "Is maternal periconceptional stress an etiological factor for non-syndromic orofacial clefts in infants"? Methods: Search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data extraction from studies reporting periconceptional maternal exposure to stress and NSOFC were implemented without language restrictions. The risks of bias in the identified studies was assessed, and this information was used in the sensitivity analyses to explain heterogeneity. A meta-analysis of the extracted data was performed. Results: Twelve eligible studies were included. Forest plot for meta-analysis of the association between maternal periconceptional exposure to stress and NSOFC among studies with adjustment for potential confounders showed a statistically significant association with an increased risk of NSOFC (odds ratio [OR]:1.17; P = 0.03), which was apparent for both cleft lip with and without palate (OR:2.07; P = 0.007) and cleft palate (OR:1.72; P = 0.003). There was a substantial heterogeneity between studies, which improved when analyzing only studies that were adjusted for potential confounders. Conclusion: Based on the currently available evidence, maternal exposure to periconceptional stress could be considered a risk factor for NSOFCs. Therefore, we strongly recommend research investigating the effect of stress caused by the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on the incidence of clefts.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...