Review of the spectrum of tuberous sclerosis complex: The Saudi Arabian Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in the paediatric Saudi population and to characterise the range of clinical symptoms, neurocutaneous findings, neuroimaging results, and complications of the disease. METHODS: A total of 61 genetically confirmed TSC patients from the National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) in Saudi Arabia were the subject of this retrospective descriptive analysis. The data were presented using descriptive measures. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was found to be 4.9 years. Subependymal nodules (86.9%), numerous cortical tubers and/or radial migration lines (63.9%), and hypomelanotic macules (63.9%) were the 3 most common significant criteria. The vast majority (86.9%) of those diagnosed had epilepsy, of which 50% were considered medically intractable. Nearly half of our subjects underwent genetic testing, which revealed that TSC2 predominated over TSC1. Symptoms of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND) were present in 66.7% of TSC1 patients and 73.9% of TSC2 patients. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that the clinical spectrum of TSC among Saudi children is consistent with the body of existing literature. The TSC2 was more prevalent than TSC1. The most frequent signs were cutaneous and neurological. Monitoring TSC patients regularly is crucial to identify any issues as soon as possible.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of COVID-19 Vaccine Among Saudi Mothers.

BACKGROUND:  The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is a novel vaccine that was created during the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 to combat the highly contagious COVID-19 infection. Since the initiation of vaccine administration campaigns globally, lots of research was simultaneously being done to study the vaccine's side effects and possible complications, especially in vulnerable groups such as pregnant women and children. Saudi Arabia is one of the leading countries in administering the COVID-19 vaccine to its population. However, due to the exchange of a lot of incorrect information through social media platforms about the vaccine's safety, people, particularly women expecting a child, breastfeeding, or having younger children, started to display some vaccine hesitancy. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of the COVID-19 vaccine among Saudi mothers and to recognize how certain individual characteristics affect it. METHODS:  This is an observational cross-sectional study that was carried out among 293 Saudi mothers attending primary healthcare clinics at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from April 2022 to July 2022. The participants completed a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire that was composed of 39 closed-response questions divided into four sections: participant characteristics, knowledge, attitude, and practice towards the COVID-19 vaccine. The English questionnaire was translated to Arabic, retranslated back to English, and then compared to the first English version by a different translator to ensure translation accuracy. A pilot study was conducted on 20 participants before the survey was distributed for data collection. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The association between the four sections of the questionnaire was assessed using Chi-square test of proportion.  Results: The study found that 64% of the participants were below the age of 40. The majority (56%) have earned a bachelor's or a higher degree. According to 41%, "Ministry of Health official channels" was the most important source of COVID-19 vaccine-related information. Almost half of the respondents (45%) showed to have an excellent knowledge of the COVID-19 vaccine and 62% showed to have a positive attitude towards it. Around 40% of the participants reported that they delayed taking the COVID-19 vaccine until it was mandatory. For those who have children aged between 12 and 18 years, 78% stated that their children took the COVID-19 vaccine. Mothers aged below 40 years showed to have significantly better vaccine knowledge compared to the older group. Mothers who received the influenza vaccine over the past three years were less likely to delay taking the COVID-19 vaccine until it became mandatory compared to those who did not receive it.  Conclusion: Younger age, higher educational level, flu vaccine administration in the previous three years, and adherence to child immunization schedules were all factors that had a significant impact on the KAP towards the COVID-19 vaccine. Correcting misunderstandings about vaccine safety through educational campaigns and providing timely information through the Ministry of Health channels can all contribute to achieving better practice related to vaccine uptake in this group.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on bone mineral density: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Despite the fact that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most prescribed medications, several epidemiological studies have reported many adverse effects related to their long-term usage. Nevertheless, there were inconsistent findings in the literature with regard to PPI use and bone mineral density (BMD) change. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between the use of PPIs and change in BMD. The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL databases were searched up to March 2019. Ten studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria (4761 cases and 30,809 controls), from which the mean difference and mean annualized percent change in BMD were pooled using RevMan 5.3.5 The results showed no statistically significant association between PPI users and non-users in mean annualized percent change in BMD (0.06; 95% CI -0.07, 0.18) with moderate heterogeneity (I2: 63%). There was a statistically significant reduction in the mean BMD difference among PPI users (-0.03; 95% CI -0.04, -0.01) with no substantial heterogeneity (I2: 26%). This meta-analysis reported inconsistent results regarding the use of PPIs and BMD loss. Thus, the effect of PPIs on BMD needs to be elucidated by other studies, and healthcare providers should prescribe PPIs with caution considering their unfavorable consequences on bone health.

Patient perceptions and preferences of physicians' attire in Saudi primary healthcare setting.

Background: Since the time of Hippocrates, dress of the care-giver has been known to influence patient's perception about the physician. Objectives: To explore patient's preference about physician's dress in Saudi primary healthcare, and how it influences their perception, regarding professionalism, competence, and confidence in the physician. Methods: A cross sectional study conducted in primary care clinics in Riyadh, enrolling 443 patients, who filled a self-administered Arabic questionnaire, enquiring about physician clothes such as white coat, scrubs and 'thob (white-robe) shomagh (head cover)' for males, 'veil-skirt' for females, and shoes. Patients' preferences about physicians' dresses were explored and influence of favorable dress on professionalism and trustworthiness were explored, using Chi-sq, Mann Whitney, with p ≤ .05 as significant. Principle component analysis was used to search themes in attire commonly used. Results: Over 80% of patients visiting Saudi primary care, liked seeing their physician in white coat. Traditional dress 'thob and shomagh' was approved by 47% whereas 'veil and skirt' got acceptance of 62%. Dress of physician was significantly (p < .005) more important to patients, who were male (Chi-sq 14.95), working (Chi-sq 9.39), educated (Chi-sq 9.84), urbanites (Chi-sq 18.34) and married (Chi-sq 7.89). Patients who valued physician attire (70%) perceived it positively influencing doctor-patient relationship: Mann Whitney U score = 6879, p-value <0.001. Four dress-themes emerged: 'Professional modest', 'Expensive modern', 'Traditional formal' and 'Casual shoes'. Conclusion: Patients preferred white coats for their doctors. Half of participants accepted traditional dresses. Majority valued physician's attire as a positive influence.

Public knowledge awareness and attitudes toward epilepsy in Al-Kharj Governorate Saudi Arabia.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is one of the most stigmatizing disorders. Stigmas and negative attitudes associating epilepsy are due to poor public awareness and knowledge. This study evaluated Saudi public Knowledge, awareness, and attitude towards epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted during the period from September 16, 2014 to January 1st 2015. A 20-item questionnaire adapted from the literature was validated and distributed to 422 adults living in Al-Kharj governorate, and 22 participants were excluded as they have never heard or read about epilepsy. RESULTS: About 94.79% of participants have heard or read about epilepsy, 63% of them knew someone with epilepsy, and 49.75% have witnessed a seizure attack. Seventy per cent of subjects thought that epilepsy is a neurological disease and 59% believed it is a brain disease. Almost 46.5% selected possession by demons or evil spirits and 51.25% cited envy or evil eye. More than half of subjects selected the medical treatment and follow-up as the most effective treatment of epilepsy. Rather, 41% believed in the faith healing. Most of respondents (81.5%) believed that epileptic children could be successful in normal classes. The vast majority agreed with that epileptic woman can get married and have children. Moreover, 65.25% would allow their offspring to play with epileptic persons and surprisingly, 59% would let their offspring marrying a person with epilepsy. As much as 82.75% agreed to work with epileptic persons and 85.5% would easily become a close friend of them. The equal job opportunity for epileptic and normal persons should be practiced to about 53.75% of subjects. The predictors of good knowledge, limited misconception, and positive attitudes were female gender, being a relative of an epileptic person, and having high educational level. CONCLUSION: The public knowledge, awareness of and attitudes toward epilepsy were acceptable with regard to this study. However, the negative attitudes and misconceptions still exist.

Prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in adults visiting primary health-care setting in Riyadh.

Background and objectives: Subclinical hypothyroidism is an asymptomatic condition with normal thyroxin and raised thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level. The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism in primary health care (PHC) settings in Riyadh and explore the relationship of TSH level with age, gender, family history, body mass index, and co-morbid conditions. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study of adult visitors to nine satellites PHC clinics in military housing in Riyadh was carried out. TSH concentration and free T4 levels were measured. Data were collected by nurses and physicians during routine clinical practice in primary care. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables in study, and relationships were explored using chi-square, t-test, analysis of variance, and linear regression. Results: A total of 340 out of 394 participants in the study gave blood samples. Subclinical hyperthyroidism was identified in 2.1% (p = .001) and subclinical hypothyroidism in 10.3% (p = .001) of the PHC visitors. TSH levels were found to be significantly higher (p = .047) in elderly population of ≥60 years and those with family history of thyroid disease. Non-significant upward trends were noted in TSH levels with hyperlipidemia and increasing blood pressure. No overt hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism was found in our study sample. Conclusion: Subclinical hypothyroidism has a prevalence of 10% of adults visiting PHC's. TSH levels are higher in the elderly, which warrants screening of those aged 60 years and above.

Parents' perceptions about child abuse and their impact on physical and emotional child abuse: A study from primary health care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine perceptions of parents about child abuse, and their impact on physical and emotional child abuse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred parents attending three primary health care centers (PHCCs) in Riyadh serving National Guard employes and their families, were requested to participate in this survey. Data was collected by self administered questionnaire. Five main risk factors areas/domains were explored; three were parent related (personal factors, history of parents' childhood abuse, and parental attitude toward punishment), and two were family/community effects and factors specific to the child. SPSS was used for data entry and analysis. Descriptive analysis included computation of mean, median, mode, frequencies, and percentages; Chi-square test and t-test were used to test for statistical significance, and regression analysis performed to explore relationships between child abuse and various risk factors. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of the parents reported a childhood history of physical abuse. Almost 18% of the parents used physical punishment. The risk factors associated significantly with child abuse were parents' history of physical abuse, young parent, witness to domestic violence, and poor self-control. Child-related factors included a child who is difficult to control or has attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Parents who did not own a house were more likely to use physical punishment. Abusive beliefs of parent as risk factors were: physical punishment as an effective educational tool for a noisy child; parents' assent to physical punishment for children; it is difficult to differentiate between physical punishment and child abuse; parents have the right to discipline their child as they deem necessary; and there is no need for a system for the prevention of child abuse. CONCLUSION: The causes of child abuse and neglect are complex. Though detecting child abuse may be difficult in primary care practice, many risk factors can be identified early. Parents' attitudes can be measured, and prevention initiatives, such as screening and counseling for parents of children at risk, can be developed and incorporated into primary care practice.

In the era of corona virus: health care professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practice of hand hygiene in Saudi primary care centers: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is one of the essential means to prevent the spread of infections. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) of hand hygiene in primary care settings. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a self-reported questionnaire was conducted in primary care settings located in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, under the service of King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). The Institutional Review Board of KAMC Research Centre approved the study. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 237 participants were included in the analysis. Participants who received hand hygiene training within the last 3 years (2012-2014) scored higher on a knowledge scale. Generally, there was an overall positive attitude from participants toward hand hygiene practice. In total, 87.54% acknowledged that they routinely used alcohol-based hand rub, 87.4% had sufficiently decontaminated hands even under high work pressure, and 78.6% addressed that this practice was not affected by less compliant colleagues. CONCLUSION: Practicing hand hygiene was suggested to be influenced by variables related to the environmental context, social pressure, and individual attitudes toward hand hygiene. We believe that addressing beliefs, attitudes, capacity, and supportive infrastructures to sustain hand-hygiene routine behaviors are important components of an implementation strategy in enhancing health care workers' KAP of hand hygiene.

Accuracy of urea breath test in Helicobacter pylori infection: meta-analysis.

AIM: To quantitatively summarize and appraise the available evidence of urea breath test (UBT) use to diagnose Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with dyspepsia and provide pooled diagnostic accuracy measures. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and other databases for studies addressing the value of UBT in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. We included cross-sectional studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of UBT in adult patients with dyspeptic symptoms. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies)-2 tool. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted by UBT type (13C vs 14C) and by measurement technique (Infrared spectrometry vs Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry). RESULTS: Out of 1380 studies identified, only 23 met the eligibility criteria. Fourteen studies (61%) evaluated 13C UBT and 9 studies (39%) evaluated 14C UBT. There was significant variation in the type of reference standard tests used across studies.Pooled sensitivity was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.95-0.97) andpooled specificity was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.91-0.94). Likelihood ratio for a positive test was 12 and for a negative test was 0.05 with an area under thecurve of 0.985. Meta-analyses were associated with a significant statistical heterogeneity that remained unexplained after subgroup analysis. The included studies had a moderate risk of bias. CONCLUSION: UBT has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting H. pylori infection in patients with dyspepsia. The reliability of diagnostic meta-analytic estimates however is limited by significant heterogeneity.

Adult depression screening in Saudi primary care: prevalence, instrument and cost.

BACKGROUND: By the year 2020 depression would be the second major cause of disability adjusted life years lost, as reported by the World Health Organization. Depression is a mental illness which causes persistent low mood, a sense of despair, and has multiple risk factors. Its prevalence in primary care varies between 15.3-22%, with global prevalence up to 13% and between 17-46% in Saudi Arabia. Despite several studies that have shown benefit of early diagnosis and cost-savings of up to 80%, physicians in primary care setting continue to miss out on 30-50% of depressed patients in their practices. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted at three large primary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia aiming at estimating point prevalence of depression and screening cost among primary care adult patients, and comparing Patient Health Questionnaires PHQ-2 with PHQ-9. Adult individuals were screened using Arabic version of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9. PHQ-2 scores were correlated with PHQ-9 scores using linear regression. A limited cost-analysis and cost saving estimates of depression screening was done using the Human Capital approach. RESULTS: Patients included in the survey analysis were 477, of whom 66.2% were females, 77.4% were married, and nearly 20% were illiterate. Patients exhibiting depressive symptoms on the basis of PHQ9 were 49.9%, of which 31% were mild, 13.4% moderate, 4.4% moderate-severe and 1.0% severe cases. Depression scores were significantly associated with female gender (p-value 0.049), and higher educational level (p-value 0.002). Regression analysis showed that PHQ-2 & PHQ-9 were strongly correlated R = 0.79, and R2 = 0.62. The cost-analysis showed savings of up to 500 SAR ($133) per adult patient screened once a year. CONCLUSION: The point prevalence of screened depression is high in primary care visitors in Saudi Arabia. Gender and higher level of education were found to be significantly associated with screened depression. Majority of cases were mild to moderate, PHQ-2 was equivocal to PHQ 9 in utility and that screening for depression in primary care setting is cost saving.