Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Heart J ; 54(5): 247-53, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24097211

ABSTRACT

There are conflicting reports regarding the occurrence of cardiovascular events after a major earthquake. To understand the impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake on cardiovascular events, we retrospectively examined the clinical records prepared by emergency room physicians between 2009 and 2011 (n = 66,244), and compared the occurrence of these events between 2011 and 2009, and 2011 and 2010. There was a significant increase in the number of patients with cardiovascular events during the 3 week period after the earthquake in 2011 (n = 106) compared with that during the same period in 2009 (n = 72) or 2010 (n = 65) (P = 0.002). The number of patients with acute coronary syndrome or congestive heart failure in March 2011 was significantly increased compared with 2009 or 2010, however, there were no significant increases in 2011 in other cardiovascular events including stroke, aortic dissection, pulmonary thromboembolism, or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared with 2009 or 2010. These findings suggest that the incidence of cardiovascular events may have been heterogeneous after the disaster.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Disasters , Earthquakes , Tsunamis , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Cardiol ; 62(1): 25-30, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23623140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2011, the Tohoku district was struck by the most powerful known earthquake to hit Japan. Although stress-induced heart diseases rise after strong psychosocial stress, little is known about the characteristics of heart failure (HF) caused by psychosocial stress related to earthquakes. METHODS: We examined patients admitted to our hospital for HF during a three-week period between March 11 and March 31, 2011 (Disaster group) and compared them to patients during the corresponding period of 2010 (Non-Disaster group). RESULTS: The number of patients was larger in the Disaster group (n=30, 18 men, 12 women; mean age 77.3±9.8 years) than in the Non-Disaster group (n=16, 8 men, 8 women; mean age 77.3±11.6 years). A total of 14 of 30 patients (46.7%) in the Disaster group did not have past history of admission for HF, compared to 2 patients (12.5%) in the Non-Disaster group (p=0.02). The number of patients with hypertension was larger in the Disaster group than in the Non-Disaster group (53.3% vs. 37.5%, p=0.04). The number of patients with atrial fibrillation was also larger in the Disaster group than in the Non-Disaster group (56.7% vs. 25.0%, p=0.03). Left ventricular systolic ejection fraction (EF) did not differ between the Disaster and Non-Disaster groups (45.2±17.8% vs. 45.6±14.0%, p=0.46), however, the proportion of patients whose EF was more than 45% were significantly higher in the Disaster group more than in the Non-Disaster group (56.7% vs. 43.8%, p=0.04). The in-hospital mortality rate for patients in the Disaster group was higher than in the Non-Disaster group (20.0% vs. 6.3%, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The incidence and in-hospital mortality rate of HF increased after the Great East Japan Earthquake, suggesting that psychosocial stress brought on by such a disaster could lead to the development of HF with preserved EF more than that with reduced EF.


Subject(s)
Earthquakes , Heart Failure/etiology , Aged , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Japan , Male , Stress, Psychological , Stroke Volume
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...