ABSTRACT
Since sentinel lymph node examination became routine, findings of benign ectopic breast tissue in lymph nodes have increased. We report images of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four lymph nodes in a 76-year-old woman with bilateral breast carcinoma. The right lumpectomy showed intermixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma, plus DCIS. 19 nodes were isolated in the axillary lymphadenectomy, 4 of which displayed solid and cribriform DCIS. Myosin and p63 immunohistochemical techniques were positive, suggesting an erroneous diagnosis of metastatic DCIS. A further three cases of DCIS in lymph nodes have been previously reported, all with a distinct layer of myoepithelial cells with actin, myosin or p63. Biologically, these images of DCIS in lymph nodes are not credible and three major hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings: Iatrogenic Mechanical Transport, Revertant DCIS, and primary DCIS of lymph nodes. We consider the first one the most plausible explanation. Our case is unique as several, rare findings are simultaneously observed. More new cases, together with additional immunohistochemical techniques and molecular testing on previous cases, are needed to find a definitive explanation of this histologic finding.(AU)
A partir del uso rutinario del examen del ganglio centinela, los hallazgos de tejido mamario ectópico son frecuentes. Presentamos los hallazgos de carcinoma ductal in situ (CDIS) en 4 ganglios linfáticos en una mujer de 76 años con carcinoma de mama bilateral. La lumpectomía derecha mostró una mezcla de patrones de carcinomas ductal y lobular infiltrante, además de CDIS. De los 19 ganglios aislados, 4 mostraron patrones cribiformes y sólidos de CDIS. La miosina y la p63 fueron positivas, sugiriendo un diagnóstico erróneo de «CDIS metastático». En la literatura se han comunicado 3 casos adicionales de patrones de CDIS en ganglios linfáticos, mostrando capa periférica de células mioepiteliales positivas para actina, miosina o p63. Desde un punto de vista biológico, estos hallazgos de CDIS en ganglios linfáticos son discutibles, proponiéndose 3 hipótesis para explicarlo: transporte mecánico yatrogénico, CDIS revertido y CDIS primario de ganglio linfático. Creemos que la primera alternativa es la más plausible. Nuestro caso es único al mostrar, de modo conjunto, diversos hallazgos infrecuentes. El estudio de nuevos casos, así como la aplicación de técnicas inmunohistoquímicas y moleculares a casos de archivo, arrojarían datos que permitirían llegar a una explicación definitiva de este hallazgo histológico.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating , Lymph Nodes , Neoplasm Metastasis , Sentinel Lymph Node , Choristoma , Carcinoma, Lobular , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Carcinoma , Breast Neoplasms , ImmunohistochemistryABSTRACT
Serrated lesions outside the low digestive tract are scarce, with only two traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) reported in the gallbladder, with limited information about the serrated pathway outside the colon. Our case was an incidental finding in a patient undergoing surgery to treat a cholecystitis, when a polypoid lesion was observed. The epithelium formed gland structures with ectopic crypts, serrated slits and eosinophilic cytoplasm. MUC4 and MUC5A were positive, but mismatch repair proteins (MSI) retained nuclear staining. BRAF showed a not mutated profile and NRAS/KRAS was inconclusive due to the absence of remaining tissue. MSI and CpG island (CIMP), the most common genetic hallmarks of the serrated pathway, have been proven in gallbladder carcinomas, although serrated polyps are not recognized as premalignant precursors. Hereby we report one TSA of the gallbladder without the usual genetic drivers. A larger evidence is needed to improve the diagnosis and management.(AU)
Las lesiones serradas no suelen localizarse fuera del tracto digestivo bajo, con solo 2 adenomas serrados tradicionales (TSA) descritos. Por ello, la información sobre la vía serrada fuera del colon es limitada. Nuestro caso trata de un hallazgo incidental en un paciente al que se le realizó una colecistectomía y en el que se observó una lesión polipoide. Esta formaba estructuras glandulares con criptas ectópicas, serración y citoplasma eosinófilo. MUC4 y MUC5A eran positivos, pero las proteínas implicadas en la inestabilidad de microsatélites (MSI) conservaban tinción nuclear. BRAF no estaba mutado y NRAS/KRAS no fue concluyente. La MSI y la metilación de CpG (CIMP) son las vías oncogénicas más comunes de la vía serrada y se ha demostrado en carcinomas de vesícula biliar. Sin embargo, los pólipos serrados no se reconocen como precursores premalignos. Nuestro caso trata de un adenoma serrado tradicional de vesícula biliar sin rasgos genéticos habituales. Se necesita mayor casuística en la literatura.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Gallbladder , Adenoma , Incidental Findings , Cholecystectomy , Polyps , Inpatients , Physical ExaminationABSTRACT
Since sentinel lymph node examination became routine, findings of benign ectopic breast tissue in lymph nodes have increased. We report images of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four lymph nodes in a 76-year-old woman with bilateral breast carcinoma. The right lumpectomy showed intermixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma, plus DCIS. 19 nodes were isolated in the axillary lymphadenectomy, 4 of which displayed solid and cribriform DCIS. Myosin and p63 immunohistochemical techniques were positive, suggesting an erroneous diagnosis of "metastatic DCIS". A further three cases of DCIS in lymph nodes have been previously reported, all with a distinct layer of myoepithelial cells with actin, myosin or p63. Biologically, these images of DCIS in lymph nodes are not credible and three major hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings: Iatrogenic Mechanical Transport, Revertant DCIS, and primary DCIS of lymph nodes. We consider the first one the most plausible explanation. Our case is unique as several, rare findings are simultaneously observed. More new cases, together with additional immunohistochemical techniques and molecular testing on previous cases, are needed to find a definitive explanation of this histologic finding.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating , Female , Humans , Aged , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , MyosinsABSTRACT
Serrated lesions outside the low digestive tract are scarce, with only two traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) reported in the gallbladder, with limited information about the serrated pathway outside the colon. Our case was an incidental finding in a patient undergoing surgery to treat a cholecystitis, when a polypoid lesion was observed. The epithelium formed gland structures with ectopic crypts, serrated slits and eosinophilic cytoplasm. MUC4 and MUC5A were positive, but mismatch repair proteins (MSI) retained nuclear staining. BRAF showed a not mutated profile and NRAS/KRAS was inconclusive due to the absence of remaining tissue. MSI and CpG island (CIMP), the most common genetic hallmarks of the serrated pathway, have been proven in gallbladder carcinomas, although serrated polyps are not recognized as premalignant precursors. Hereby we report one TSA of the gallbladder without the usual genetic drivers. A larger evidence is needed to improve the diagnosis and management.
