ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to examine perceptions of discrimination among a small cohort of rural older, retired minority Florida farmworkers. Potential sources of discrimination were explored, such as health literacy, age, sex, gender, racial/ethnic background, or rural residency. Sample: The study occurred in a rural area that is designated as a "hot zone" due to its HRSA designation as a medically underserved area (MUA), health provider shortage area (HPSA), and medically underserved population, despite lying only 50 miles due west of the affluent town of Palm Beach, Florida. More than 40% of residents live below the poverty level, and only 65% have received a high school diploma. Method: A descriptive, correlational pilot study was conducted to investigate potential contributors to discrimination. Independent variables examined were age, sex, gender, rural residency, racial/ethnic background, and health literacy, using the Rapid Estimate of Health Literacy in Medicine, short form (REALM-SF) (Arozullah, 2007). The incidence of self-reported discrimination was investigated. Chi-square and Pearson correlation analysis were employed to examine survey results. Findings were supplemented with a brief narrative inquiry, and responses were analyzed using Saldaña's (2015) model of cyclical coding. Findings: Twenty-five residents in a subsidized housing unit agreed to participate in this study. This convenience sample was 96% racially/ethnically diverse (68% African American, 24% Haitian Creole, and 4% Hispanic American.) Most (78%) were retired field workers, and largely self-identified as female (72%). The residents' average reading level was 4th-6th grade. Health literacy (44%) and rural residency (24%) were the greatest sources of discrimination. Female gender discrimination was associated with ethnicity discrimination (r = 0.6, p = .002). Conclusions: Providers are strongly encouraged to assess their patients' health literacy levels and experiences with discrimination to inform effective care delivery.
ABSTRACT
Background There is little data regarding postoperative outcomes of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing skull base surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine an association between risk factors and proximity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak to surgery in patients with OSA undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery. Methods A retrospective review of neurosurgical inpatients, with and without OSA, at a tertiary care institution from 2002 to 2015 that experienced a postoperative CSF leak after undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery. Results Forty patients met inclusion criteria, 12 (30%) with OSA. OSA patients had significantly higher body mass index (BMI; median 39.4 vs. 31.7, p < 0.01) and were more likely to have diabetes (41.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.04) than non-OSA patients; otherwise there were no significant differences in clinical comorbidities. No patients restarted positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the inpatient setting. The type of repair was not a significant predictor of the time from surgery to leak. Patients with OSA experienced postoperative CSF leak 49% sooner than non-OSA patients (Hazard Ratio 1.49, median 2 vs. 6 days, log-rank p = 0.20). Conclusion Patients with OSA trended toward leaking earlier than those without OSA, and no OSA patients repaired with a nasoseptal flap (NSF) had a leak after postoperative day 5. Due to a small sample size this trend did not reach significance. Future studies will help to determine the appropriate timing for restarting PPV in this high risk population. This is important given PPV's significant benefit to the patient's overall health and its ability to lower intracranial pressure.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the utility of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for staging the neck in the preoperative setting by comparing it to both CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic staging. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with initial diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma having preoperative MR or CT imaging and PET/CT with subsequent bilateral neck dissection as part of primary treatment (142 neck dissections). Comparison of cervical nodal metastases based on three separate staging systems: preoperative CT and/or MRI scan, preoperative PET/CT, and pathology. RESULTS: Both CT/MRI scans and PET/CT scans statistically predicted pathologic outcomes (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001, respectively) using Chi square analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in the prediction of true pathologic disease using PET/CT compared to CT and/or MRI alone (P = 0.005). In a subgroup analysis including only the contralateral neck, this significance persisted (P = 0.013). McNemar's test revealed that subsequent detection of bilateral neck disease by PET/CT scan was significantly superior to MRI or CT alone (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In pathologically positive necks, PET/CT was statistically more reliable at identifying positive disease than CT or MRI alone. Furthermore, such a result is achieved without a statistically significant difference in false positivity between PET/CT and CT or MRI. This suggests that PET/CT positivity, despite negative clinical exam and CT/MRI findings, may be more likely to signify pathologic disease and require appropriate treatment.
