Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplantation ; 104(5): 1095-1107, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31403555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identification of the relevant factors for death can improve patient's individual risk assessment and decision making. A well-documented patient cohort (n = 892) in a renal transplant program with protocol biopsies was used to establish multivariable models for risk assessment at 3 and 12 months posttransplantation by random survival forest analysis. METHODS: Patients transplanted between 2000 and 2007 were observed for up to 11 years. Loss to follow-up was negligible (n = 15). A total of 2251 protocol biopsies and 1214 biopsies for cause were performed. All rejections and clinical borderline rejections in protocol biopsies were treated. RESULTS: Ten-year patient survival was 78%, with inferior survival of patients with graft loss. Using all pre- and posttransplant variables until 3 and 12 months (n = 65), the obtained models showed good performance to predict death (concordance index: 0.77-0.78). Validation with a separate cohort of patients (n = 349) showed a concordance index of 0.76 and good discrimination of risks by the models, despite substantial differences in clinical variables. Random survival forest analysis produced robust models over a wide range of parameter settings. Besides well-established risk factors like age, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and graft function, posttransplant urinary tract infection and rejection treatment were important factors. Urinary tract infection and rejection treatment were not specifically associated with death due to infection or malignancy but correlated strongly with inferior graft function and graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: The established models indicate the important areas that need special attention in the care of renal transplant patients, particularly modifiable factors like graft rejection and urinary tract infection.


Subject(s)
Forecasting , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Registries , Risk Assessment/methods , Transplant Recipients , Biopsy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Kidney/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 34(7): 1171-1181, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860340

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identification and quantification of the relevant factors for death can improve patients' individual risk assessment and decision-making. We used a well-documented patient cohort (n = 892) in a renal transplant programme with protocol biopsies to establish multivariable Cox models for risk assessment at 3 and 12 months post-transplantation. METHODS: Patients transplanted between 2000 and 2007 were observed up to 11 years (total observation 5227 patient-years; median 5.9 years). Loss to follow-up was negligible (n = 15). A total of 2251 protocol biopsies and 1214 biopsies for cause were performed. All rejections and clinical borderline rejections in protocol biopsies were treated. RESULTS: Overall 10-year patient survival was 78%, with inferior survival of patients with graft loss and superior survival of patients with living-donor transplantation. Eight factors were common in the models at 3 and 12 months, including age, pre-transplant heart failure and a score of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, post-transplant urinary tract infection, treatment of rejection, new-onset heart failure, coronary events and malignancies. Additional variables of the model at 3 months included deceased donor transplantation, transplant lymphocele, BK virus nephropathy and severe infections. Graft function and graft loss were significant factors of the model at 12 months. Internal validation and validation with a separate cohort of patients (n = 349) demonstrated good discrimination of the models. CONCLUSIONS: The identified factors indicate the important areas that need special attention in the pre- and post-transplant care of renal transplant patients. On the basis of these models, we provide nomograms as a tool to weigh individual risks that may contribute to decreased survival.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Forecasting , Graft Rejection/pathology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney/pathology , Registries , Risk Assessment/methods , Cause of Death/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/mortality , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Polyomavirus Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...