Dissolution Profile Similarity Assessment-Best Practices, Decision Trees and Global Harmonization.

During the write-up of the meeting summary reports from the 2019 dissolution similarity workshop held at the University of Maryland's Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI), several coauthors continued their discussions to develop a "best-practice" document defining the steps required to assess dissolution profiles in support of certain biowaivers and postapproval changes. In previous reports, current challenges related to dissolution profile studies were discussed such that the steps outlined in the two flow charts ("decision trees") presented here can be applied. These decision trees include both recommendations for the use of equivalence procedures between reference and test products as well as application of the dissolution safe space concept. Common approaches towards establishing dissolution safe spaces are described. This paper encourages the preparation of protocols clearly describing why and how testing is performed along with the expected pass/fail criteria prior to generating data on the materials to be evaluated. The target audience of this manuscript includes CMC regulatory scientists, laboratory analysts, as well as statisticians from industry and regulatory health agencies involved in the assessment of product quality via in vitro dissolution testing. Building upon previous publications, this manuscript provides a solution to the current ambiguity related to dissolution profile comparison. The principles outlined in this and previous manuscripts provide a basis for global regulatory alignment in the application of dissolution profile assessment to support manufacturing changes and biowaiver requests.

Developing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications (CRDSs) for Oral Drug Products: Virtual Webinar Series.

A webinar series that was organised by the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Biopharmaceutics focus group in 2021 focused on the challenges of developing clinically relevant dissolution specifications (CRDSs) for oral drug products. Industrial scientists, together with regulatory and academic scientists, came together through a series of six webinars, to discuss progress in the field, emerging trends, and areas for continued collaboration and harmonisation. Each webinar also hosted a Q&A session where participants could discuss the shared topic and information. Although it was clear from the presentations and Q&A sessions that we continue to make progress in the field of CRDSs and the utility/success of PBBM, there is also a need to continue the momentum and dialogue between the industry and regulators. Five key areas were identified which require further discussion and harmonisation.

DISSOLUTION PROFILE SIMILARITY ANALYSES-STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES, METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS.

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance with the emphasis given to the similarity factor f2 with little discussion of alternative methods. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive toward global harmonization, a workshop entitled "In Vitro Dissolution Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When" was held on May 21-22, 2019 at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This manuscript provides in-depth discussion of the mathematical principles of the model-independent statistical methods for dissolution profile similarity analyses presented in the workshop. Deeper understanding of the testing objective and statistical properties of the available statistical methods is essential to identify methods which are appropriate for application in practice. A decision tree is provided to aid in the selection of an appropriate statistical method based on the underlying characteristics of the drug product. Finally, the design of dissolution profile studies is addressed regarding analytical and statistical recommendations to sufficiently power the study. This includes a detailed discussion on evaluation of dissolution profile data for which several batches per reference and/or test product are available.

Current Approaches for Dissolution Similarity Assessment, Requirements, and Global Expectations.

This report summarizes podium presentations and breakout sessions from the second day of the 2019 M-CERSI workshop on In Vitro Dissolution Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, and When? Presenters from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada (HC), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), and the pharmaceutical industry shared experiences/concerns with dissolution profile similarity assessment supporting minor/moderate Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control (CMC) changes. Members from regulatory agencies explained that dissolution profile similarity testing is only part of the overall assessment of the acceptability of the proposed changes; decisions are usually made based on aggregate weight of evidence. Scientific shortcomings of f2 were highlighted but no proposal on how to replace it was made. Controlling dissolution timepoint variability and application of pairwise batch-to-batch comparisons (PBC) of dissolution profiles caused considerable debate. Several industry participants suggested increased sample sizes to raise confidence in decision-making and to avoid PBC. They proposed identification of a single mathematical method with predefined acceptance criteria and suggested that dissolution timepoint selection should follow EMA and HC guidance. A majority of meeting attendees favored applying clinically relevant dissolution specifications (CRDS) and dissolution safe space to determine the impact of minor/moderate CMC changes as opposed to dissolution profile similarity assessment via statistical methods. Day 2 of the workshop highlighted the need and opportunities for global harmonization including variability, timepoint selection, role of CRDS, and statistical methods to address the ambiguity globally operating pharmaceutical companies are currently facing.

Enabling online determination of the size-dependent RNA content of lipid nanoparticle-based RNA formulations.

The potential of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) as nucleic acid delivery vehicles has been demonstrated in recent years, culminating in the emergency use approval of LNP-based mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in late 2020. The determination of RNA content relative to LNP size can be important to the understanding of efficacy and adverse effects. This work presents the first description of a facile and rapid analytical method for online, size-dependent RNA payload distribution measurement using data from multi-angle light scattering, ultraviolet and refractive index detectors following separation of the LNPs by size-exclusion chromatography. The analysis was validated by size-based fractionation of the LNPs with subsequent offline analysis of the fractions. Four LNPs formulated with different PEG-lipids and different lipid compositions were tested. Good agreement was observed between the online and offline size-based RNA distributions among all four LNPs, demonstrating the utility of the online method for LNP-encapsulated RNA in general, and suggesting a means for simplified biophysical quantitation of a dosing-related critical quality attribute.

Probing Protein Conformation Destabilization in Sterile Liquid Formulations through the Formation of 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine.

This work demonstrates the use of a fluorescent probe to screen protein conformational changes in mixtures of monoclonal antibodies and determine the region of where such changes may originate through a footprinting mass spectrometry approach. The oxidative stress of mixtures of two different immunoglobulins (IgG1, IgG2, or IgG4) performed in the presence of 2,2'-azobis(2-amidinopropane dihydrochloride) results in sequence-specific tyrosine oxidation reactions depending on the time of incubation of the IgG molecules and the nature of the excipients present in the formulation. The combination of a fluorescence assay, based on the detection of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and mass spectrometry analyses, permits the identification of protein conformation changes. In a mixture of IgG2 and IgG4, a destabilization of IgG4 in the presence of IgG2 is observed. The destabilized region involves the Fab region of IgG4 between Tyr63 and Tyr81 and potentially multiple regions of IgG2.

Development of an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-charged aerosol detection/UV method for the quantitation of linear polyethylenimines in oligonucleotide polyplexes.

Linear polyethylenimines are polycationic excipients that have found many pharmaceutical applications, including as a delivery vehicle for gene therapy through formation of polyplexes with oligonucleotides. Accurate quantitation of linear polyethylenimines in both starting solution and formulation containing oligonucleotide/polyethylenimine polyplexes is critical. Existing methods using spectroscopy, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry time-of-flight, or nuclear magnetic resonance are either complex or suffer from low selectivity. Here, the development and performance of a simple analytical method is described whereby linear polyethylenimines are resolved by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography and quantified using either a charged aerosol detector or an ultraviolet detector. For formulated oligonucleotide/polyethylenimine polyplexes, sample preparation through decomplexation/digestion by trifluoroacetic acid was necessary to eliminate separation interference. The method can be used not only to support formulation development but also to monitor the synthesis/purification and characterization of linear polyethylenimines.

Assessing the Impact of Different Light Sources on Product Quality During Pharmaceutical Drug Product Manufacture - Fluorescent Versus Light-Emitting Diode Light.

Pharmaceutical scientists are often asked to assess the impact of modifications to the illumination in the manufacturing and product packaging environment on product quality. To assess the impact of switching light sources, four model compounds were exposed to standard fluorescent light, LED, and "yellow light" and the extent of drug photodegradation was determined. Photodegradation under LED light is generally reduced compared to fluorescent light and is often predictable if the UV-Vis absorption spectrum of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and the spectral power distribution emitted by the various light sources overlap. However, lack of noticeable spectral overlap does not ensure absence of API photodegradation and may require additional assessment for selection of appropriate lighting conditions. A detailed evaluation of the API and solid formulation absorbance was performed to assess degradation risk for Compound A and Vitamin D3 when exposed to LED light. The light budget was established for Compound A, spanning all stages of the manufacturing process, under different illumination conditions to enable a complex supply chain. The results also demonstrate that while LEDs used in manufacturing areas are generally "better" compared to fluorescent lights, they are not replacing yellow lights for compounds sensitive to visible light.

Development of an automated and High throughput UHPLC/MS based workflow for cleaning verification of potent compounds in the pharmaceutical manufacturing environment.

Cleaning verification (CV) is a critical step in the pharmaceutical manufacturing process to eliminate or reduce unacceptable contamination of a product as a result of insufficiently cleaned equipment surfaces. The main concern is cross contamination with active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from previous runs that may impact patient safety. Current conventional approaches involve rather tedious sample preparation and analytical methods with relative lengthy analysis time. Potent APIs possessing low acceptable daily intake (ADI) values require analytical methods for CV with very low detection limits to confirm that these APIs are below their acceptance limits prior to the next manufacturing process. In this work, a novel end to end CV workflow was developed, which includes the automated sample and calibration solution preparation as well as high throughput analysis by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled with single quadrupole mass spectrometry in multiple injection chromatography and selected ion monitoring mode (MIC-MS-SIM). The method was validated using ten model compounds. Acceptable specificity, linearity (R2 > 0.997) and single digit ng/mL LOQ and LOD were achieved for all model compounds. This approach was also successfully applied to the analysis of 22 internal CV samples from an internal program.

In Vitro Dissolution Profiles Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When-Workshop Summary Report.

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product performance decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance. However, the requirements (e.g., which time points, number of time points, %CV) to apply the widely known similarity factor f2 and other alternative statistical approaches diverge noticeably across regulatory agencies. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive towards global harmonization, a workshop entitled "in vitro dissolution similarity assessment in support of drug product quality: what, how, when" was held May 21-22, 2019, at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This article summarizes key points from the podium presentations and breakout (BO) sessions focusing on (1) contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of several statistical methods; (2) the importance of experimental design for successful similarity evaluation; (3) the value of similarity evaluation in light of clinically relevant specifications; and (4) the need for creating a robust and scientifically appropriate path (e.g., non-prescriptive decision tree) for dissolution profile similarity assessment as a stepping stone for global harmonization.

Biowaiver Applications in Support of a Polymorph During Late-Stage Clinical Development of Verubecestat-Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for Global Regulatory Alignment.

Dissolution experiments to support an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) form change in Verubecestat immediate release tablets were performed following current regulatory guidance published by health authorities in Canada, Australia, Japan, the EU, and the USA. Verubecestat API meets the requirements of a Biopharmaceutics Classification System class 1 compound and tablets are very  rapidly dissolving in aqueous dissolution media. While the in vitro data were reviewed favorably by these agencies, the divergence in regulatory requirements led to unnecessary work and highlights several issues companies operating globally face to justify product changes that have very little impact on quality. The data presented in this manuscript provide a compelling case for adjustments to the current draft ICH M9 guidance which provides recommendations for biowaiver applications. Specifically, this manuscript contains recommendations with respect to API attributes, selection of dissolution media and apparatus, and methods to assess dissolution similarity if needed, which should be considered for inclusion in a science- and risk-based global guidance document to benefit patients, regulators, and the pharmaceutical industry.

Developing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications for Oral Drug Products-Industrial and Regulatory Perspectives.

A meeting that was organized by the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences Biopharmaceutics and Regulatory Sciences focus groups focused on the challenges of Developing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications (CRDS) for Oral Drug Products. Industrial Scientists that were involved in product development shared their experiences with in vitro dissolution and in silico modeling approaches to establish clinically relevant dissolution specifications. The regulators shared their perspectives on the acceptability of these different strategies for the development of acceptable specifications. The meeting also reviewed several collaborative initiatives that were relevant to regulatory biopharmaceutics. Following the scientific presentations, a roundtable session provided an opportunity for delegates to discuss the information that was shared during the presentations, debate key questions, and propose strategies to make progress in this critical area of regulatory biopharmaceutics. It was evident from the presentations and subsequent discussions that progress continues to be made with approaches to establish robust CRDS. Further dialogue between industry and regulatory agencies greatly assisted future developments and key areas for focused discussions on CRDS were identified.

Mechanistic understanding of abnormal reverse phase chromatographic behavior of basic analytes in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate.

In the process of dissolution method development for Merck proprietary compound A, a basic analyte, abnormal chromatographic behavior involving peak splitting and retention time shifting in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the sample solution was observed. A mechanistic study was conducted and the level and type of surfactant, along with the pKa of the analyte, were determined to be the critical variables in the degree of effect seen. Chromatographically, the effect was further impacted by the injection volume used, the pH and identity of the mobile phase buffer and the amount of system volume between the autosampler and the column. A simple resolution using a basic mobile phase pH was identified to be an effective way to eliminate abnormal chromatographic behavior and produce robust and reproducible analysis.

Dissolution Testing in Drug Product Development: Workshop Summary Report.

This publication summarizes the proceedings and key outcomes of the first day ("Day 1") of the 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." The overall aims of the workshop were to foster a productive dialog between industry and regulatory agencies and to discuss current strategies toward the development and implementation of clinically relevant dissolution specifications as an integral part of enhanced drug product understanding and effective drug product life-cycle management. The Day 1 podium presentations covered existing challenges and concerns for implementing highly valuable, yet often unique and novel experimental dissolution setups as quality control tools. In addition, several podium presentations highlighted opportunities to replace conventional dissolution testing with surrogate test methods to enable robust drug product and process understanding within the context of quality by design (QbD), new manufacturing technologies, and real-time release testing (RTRT). The topics covered on Day 1 laid the foundation for subsequent discussions which focused on the challenges related to establishing an in vitro-in vivo link and approaches for establishing clinically relevant drug product specifications which are becoming an expectation in regulatory submissions. Clarification of dissolution-related terminology used inconsistently among the scientific community, and the purpose of various testing approaches were key discussion topics of the Day 1 breakout sessions. The outcome of these discussions along with creative ways to overcome challenges related to bridging "exploratory dissolution approaches" with methods suitable for end-product control testing are captured within this report.

Applications of Clinically Relevant Dissolution Testing: Workshop Summary Report.

This publication summarizes the proceedings of day 3 of a 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." Specifically, this publication discusses the current approaches in building clinical relevance into drug product development for solid oral dosage forms, along with challenges that both industry and regulatory agencies are facing in setting clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) as presented at the workshop. The concept of clinical relevance is a multidisciplinary effort which implies an understanding of the relationship between the critical quality attributes (CQAs) and their impact on predetermined clinical outcomes. Developing this level of understanding, in many cases, requires introducing deliberate but meaningful variations into the critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) to establish a relationship between the resulting in vitro dissolution/release profiles and in vivo PK performance, a surrogate for clinical outcomes. Alternatively, with the intention of improving the efficiency of the drug product development process by limiting the burden of conducting in vivo studies, this understanding can be either built, or at least enhanced, through in silico efforts, such as IVIVC and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption modeling and simulation (M&S). These approaches enable dissolution testing to establish safe boundaries and reject drug product batches falling outside of the established safe range (e.g., due to inadequate in vivo performance) enabling the method to become clinically relevant. Ultimately, these efforts contribute towards patient-centric drug product development and allow regulatory flexibility throughout the lifecycle of the drug product.

Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Drug Product Development: the M-CERSI Workshop Summary Report.

On May 15th-17th, 2017, the US FDA and the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) held a workshop at the University of Maryland's Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI), to discuss the role of dissolution testing and translational modeling and simulation in enabling patient-centric solid oral drug product development. This 3-day event was attended by scientists from regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and academia. The workshop included podium presentations followed by breakout session discussions. The first day of the meeting focused on the challenges in dissolution method development and the role of dissolution testing throughout drug product development. On the second day, approaches to establish a link between in vitro testing and in vivo drug product performance (e.g., systemic exposure) were presented. Overall success rates and challenges in establishing IVIVCs via traditional and modern physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation approaches were discussed. Day 3 provided an opportunity to discuss the expectations for establishing clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS). It was recognized that understanding the impact of formulation and process variations on dissolution and in vivo performance is critical for most drug products formulated with poorly soluble drugs to ensure consistent product performance. The breakout sessions served as platforms for discussing controversial topics such as the clarification of dissolution terminology, PBPK model development and validation expectations, and approaches to set CRDPS. The meeting concluded with a commitment to continue the dialog between regulators, industry, and academia to advance overall product quality understanding.

Industry's View on Using Quality Control, Biorelevant, and Clinically Relevant Dissolution Tests for Pharmaceutical Development, Registration, and Commercialization.

This article intends to summarize the current views of the IQ Consortium Dissolution Working Group, which comprises various industry companies, on the roles of dissolution testing throughout pharmaceutical product development, registration, commercialization, and beyond. Over the past 3 decades, dissolution testing has evolved from a routine and straightforward test as a component of end-product release into a comprehensive set of tools that the developer can deploy at various stages of the product life cycle. The definitions of commonly used dissolution approaches, how they relate to one another and how they may be applied in modern drug development, and life cycle management is described in this article. Specifically, this article discusses the purpose, advantages, and limitations of quality control, biorelevant, and clinically relevant dissolution methods.

Approaches for Establishing Clinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms.

This manuscript represents the perspective of the Dissolution Analytical Working Group of the IQ Consortium. The intent of this manuscript is to highlight the challenges of, and to provide a recommendation on, the development of clinically relevant dissolution specifications (CRS) for immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms. A roadmap toward the development of CRS for IR products containing active ingredients with a non-narrow therapeutic window is discussed, within the context of mechanistic dissolution understanding, supported by in-human pharmacokinetic (PK) data. Two case studies present potential outcomes of following the CRS roadmap and setting dissolution specifications. These cases reveal some benefits and challenges of pursuing CRS with additional PK data, in light of current regulatory positions, including that of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who generally favor this approach, but with the understanding that both industry and regulatory agency perspectives are still evolving in this relatively new field. The CRS roadmap discussed in this manuscript also describes a way to develop clinically relevant dissolution specifications based primarily on dissolution data for batches used in pivotal clinical studies, acknowledging that not all IR product development efforts need to be supported by additional PK studies, albeit with the associated risk of potentially unnecessarily tight manufacturing controls. Recommendations are provided on what stages during the life cycle investment into in vivo studies may be valuable. Finally, the opportunities for CRS within the context of post-approval changes, Modeling and Simulation (M&S), and the application of biowaivers, are briefly discussed.

Identification of impurities in ivermectin bulk material by mass spectrometry and NMR.

The identification and characterization of four process impurities in bulk ivermectin and four process impurities in bulk avermectin, using a combination of MS and NMR, are discussed herein. These process impurities were shown to be 24-demethyl H2B1a, 3'-demethyl H2B1a, 3''-demethyl H2B1a and 24a-hydroxy B2a isomer. The impurities were shown to be process impurities and are present in avermectin bulk also.