Immunomodulatory Effect of a Polyherbal Formulation (Imusil) on Cyclophosphamide Induced Experimental Animal Model.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we investigated the immunomodulatory effect of a polyherbal formulation referred to as Imusil (IM) on cyclophosphamide (CP) induced immunosuppression model. METHODS: CP induced experimental animal model was used for evaluating the immunomodulatory effect of IM. For the study, animals were divided into four groups. Group I is served as the normal control, group II is treated only with CP, group III is treated with the standard drug, levamisole and group IV is treated with IM. The experimental duration was 30 days. At the end of the study, we had evaluated various parameters such as immune organ index, liver marker enzymes, antioxidants, haematological analysis, Th1/Th2 cytokine balance and humoral immune responses were examined using ELISA kits, T-lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry, and histopathological analysis of the liver, spleen and thymus by H&E staining. RESULTS: The results obtained from the study revealed that the treatment of immunosuppressed animals with IM significantly (p<0.05) reversed the immune response in a positive manner. Treatment with IM properly shields the immune organs and triggers the cell-mediated and humoral immune responses accordingly. Thus, no significant changes were observed in the haematological parameters. Moreover, IM supplementation helps to boost up the antioxidant activity, thereby preventing oxidative stress-mediated damage, and also protects the liver from the toxicity induced by CP. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that IM has the ability to counteract the immunosuppressive effect of chemotherapeutic drugs by stimulating the immune system, along with its potent antioxidant and hepatoprotective properties.

The Efficacy and Safety of Imusil® Tablets in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Mild COVID-19: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a serious concern of the new era. Along with antiviral synthetic medications, there is a need to discover efficacious herbal antiviral medicines with minimum side effects in patients against COVID-19. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Imusil® among patients with mild COVID-19. Methods A prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, interventional study was conducted in patients with mild COVID-19 infection. Patients received either Imusil one tablet four times a day (seven days) along with the standard of care (SoC) or only SoC. The study endpoints were reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity, changes in cycle threshold (CT), clinical improvement, change in blood inflammatory indexes, and safety assessment. Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled, and 98 received at least one dose of treatment. The median age of patients was 36.0 years, and 58 were males. By day 4, 85.4% of patients in the Imusil+SoC group tested negative for RT-PCR compared to 64% of patients exhibiting the same outcome in the SoC group (P=0.0156). After eight days, clinical improvement was observed in all patients from the Imusil+SoC group, while in the SoC group, clinical improvement was observed in 94.0% of patients (P=0.4947). During follow-up visits, the average C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased from baseline in both treatment groups. The decrease in the levels of CRP (-7.3 mg/dL versus -5.5 mg/dL), D-dimer (-231.0 ng/mL versus -151.6 ng/mL), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) (-2.3 pg/mL versus -2.0 pg/mL) at eight days was comparatively higher in the Imusil+SoC group versus the SoC group. There were no serious treatment-emergent adverse events in the drug arm. Conclusion Imusil provides effective antiviral activity and safety in mild COVID-19 patients. Imusil ensures faster RT-PCR negativity and clinical improvement and ensures effective reduction of inflammatory markers such as CRP, D-dimer and interleukin 6.

Management of polycystic ovary syndrome among Indian women using myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol.

Myo-Inositol and D-chiro-inositol (MI-DCI) are used in the treatment of polycystic Ovary syndrome (PCOS) due to their insulin-sensitizing actions. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the treatment patterns, clinical effectiveness and safety of MI-DCI combination in anagement of PCOS in Indian women. Data from 50 healthcare centers across India was collected between September 2019 and February 2020 and was used in the study. Women aged 12-45 years diagnosed with PCOS, who had received MI-DCI (550-150 mg) were included. The outcome parameters were change in weight, luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio, hirsutism, blood glucose and insulin levels, HOMA-IR, and lipid profile. A total of 283 women were included (mean age: 27.74 years; body mass index: 26.89 kg/m2); of which 197 (69.61%) reported reduction in weight after treatment with MI-DCI. The hirsutism scores considerably improved after treatment and the proportion of patients with, no hirsutism increased from 31.07% to 50.51% and moderate hirsutism reduced from 32.52% to 6.12% while, there were no patients with severe hirsutism after the treatment. There was a significant reduction in LH:FSH ratio (mean difference: 0.25 mg/dL; p=0.021), free testosterone (mean difference: 1.49; p<0.001) and dehydroepiandrosterone (mean difference: 21.49; P<0.001) levels after regular use of MI-DCI tablets. Treatment with MI-DCI resulted in significant improvement in insulin levels, HOMA-IR score, Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG) and lipid profile. The therapy restored menstruation and spontaneous ovulation and significantly attenuated the LH/FSH ratio. Thus, MI-DCI (550-150 mg) has shown multidimensional benefits in improving the hormonal, glycemic, and lipid profile of women with PCOS with considerable efficacy and tolerability.

Resurgence of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases in patients recovered from COVID-19: An Indian perspective.

Objective: The aim of this study was to understand the prevalence, extent, clinical approach of hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients recovered from COVID-19. Methods: The round table meetings (RTMs) and survey convened a diverse panel of specialists including cardiologists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, consultant physicians, and family physicians from various geographical zones of India. A standard questionnaire including 10 questions was developed pertaining to the resurgence of hypertension and CVD in patients recovered from COVID-19. The RTMs and survey were held virtually. The collected opinions and recommendations were compiled to derive a consensus document. Results: A total of 3066 health-care practitioners (HCPs) participated. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity in patients recovered from COVID-19 followed by diabetes, dyslipidemia, and coronary artery disease. Almost two-thirds of HCPs reported that 10%-30% newly diagnosed hypertension in patients recovered from COVID-19. Uncontrolled hypertension in 10-20% of COVID-19 recovered patients opined by 45% of the HCPs. About, 35% HCPs reported CV complications in 10-20% of Covid-19 recovered patients and 63% HCPs reported exacerbations of CAD in 10-30% of patients. Majority of HCPs preferred to switch to dual combination therapy from monotherapy for hypertension management (52.0%) and ARBs and its combination is most preferred combination for hypertension control (60%). Majority of the HCPs suggested follow-up after 1-2 weeks (39.0%). Close monitoring on symptoms including chest pain and breathlessness (45.0%), adherence to medication and regular monitoring of lab parameters (25%) is recommended for these patients. Conclusion: Overall observations indicate an increased incidence of hypertension and CVDs post recovery from COVID-19. A dual therapy of ARBs was the preferred choice for management of hypertension. Regular follow-up and close monitoring of symptoms to prevent further CV complications in COVID-19 recovered patients is recommended.

Experts' Consensus on Use of Long-Acting Nitroglycerine in the Management of Angina and Chronic Coronary Syndrome in India.

AIM: To address the existing gaps in knowledge about long-acting nitroglycerine (LA-NTG) and provide recommendations to address these issues. METHODOLOGY: Approved LA-NTG questionnaire that included 17 questions related to the role of LA-NTG in the management of angina and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) was shared with 150 expert cardiologists from different regions from India. Results of these survey questionnaires were further discussed in 12 regional level meetings. The opinions and suggestions from all the meetings were compiled and analyzed. Further, recommendations were made with the help of attending national cardiology experts and a consensus statement was derived. RESULTS: This is the first consensus on LA-NTG, summarizing the clinical evidence from India and suggesting recommendations based on these data. The experts recommended early use of LA-NTG as a first-line antianginal therapy in combination with beta-blocker since it improves exercise tolerance in patients with CCS. A strong consensus was observed for using LA-NTG in patients with co-morbid hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and post-percutaneous coronary intervention angina. As a part of cardiac rehabilitation, LA-NTG allows patients with angina to exercise to a greater functional capacity. CONCLUSIONS: A national consensus was observed for several aspects of LA-NTG in the management of angina and CCS. The clinical experience of the experts confirmed an extremely satisfied patient perception about the efficacy of LA-NTG.

Management of American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology-Defined Stage 2 Hypertension by Cardiologists in India.

Uncontrolled hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor and therefore requires effective approaches to patient management. This study assessed approaches to the management of patients with Stage 2 hypertension by cardiologists in India. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational, case-based questionnaire study. Data on demographic characteristics, risk factors associated with Stage 2 hypertension, use of antihypertensive medications, side effects, and approaches to education for 2,540 patients were extracted from questionnaire responses provided by 508 cardiologists. The study population of patients with Stage 2 hypertension had a mean age of 55.0 years. Most of the patients (62.6%) were aged 30 to 60 years and diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity (48.9%). Triple antihypertensive therapy was being used by 760 patients, and 634 and 1,146 patients were receiving 4 and 5 different antihypertensive medications, respectively. Telmisartan, amlodipine, chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, metoprolol, and prazosin were the commonly prescribed drugs. Ankle edema (27.7%) was the most frequent side effect of therapy. Pharmacotherapy was supported by patient education and lifestyle modifications for better blood pressure control. The standardized approach to the collection and assessment of these contemporary data provides useful insights into the characteristics and treatment of patients with Stage 2 hypertension in India.

Expert Opinion About the Pharmacoeconomic Edge of Low-Cost Dapagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Indian Clinical Settings.

Background This study aimed to understand the attitudes, beliefs, and concerns of physicians across India regarding the economic burden of diabetes and subsequently the cost-effectiveness of low-cost dapagliflozin for the management of patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on background metformin therapy in Indian clinical settings. Method A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among physicians treating people with T2DM with or without complications. The questions covered the general aspects of affordability and adherence to diabetes medications as well as specific details of low-cost dapagliflozin and its cost-effectiveness. Results In total, 844 physicians provided a response to the survey questionnaire. The physicians who participated in the study included diabetologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, consulting physicians, and family physicians. A majority of the physicians (53%) opined that only 10%-30% of their patients can afford the cost of newer antidiabetic medicines, while 25% of the physicians mentioned that <10% of their patients had issues related to affordability. Further, 39% of the physicians opined that 20%-40% of their patients discontinue the medicines due to high cost. Most of the physicians (95%) agreed that due to the low cost of dapagliflozin, it can be used for the primary prevention of heart failure in patients with T2DM in India. Similarly, 98% of the physicians agreed that it can be used for the treatment of heart failure in patients with or without T2DM in India. A majority of these physicians (93%) responded that switching from expensive sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) to low-cost dapagliflozin is a long-term cost-effective management of T2DM. In total, 98% of the physicians agreed that low-cost dapagliflozin has the characteristics of an ideal SGLT2i because of its metabolic benefits, cardioprotection, nephroprotection, and potential cost-effectiveness. Conclusion This survey-based study indicates that dapagliflozin is an effective and cost-saving therapy for patients with T2DM and complications. Low-cost dapagliflozin can revolutionize the treatment of T2DM in the Indian setting.

REAL-world evidence of risk factors and comorbidities in YOUNG Indian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A REAL YOUNG (diabetes) study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and comorbidities associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in young adult patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicentric real-world study that included young adults (18-45 years) with T2DM. Primary information including demographics, medical and family history, biochemical measures (pre-and post-prandial blood glucose levels, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] and blood pressure, and lipid parameters) smoking and drinking habits were collected retrospectively from the medical records of the respective hospitals/clinics. Data were analyzed using descriptive and appropriate comparative statistics. RESULTS: A total of 22,921 patients from 623 sites were included. The median age was 37.0 years and the majority were men (61.6%). The proportion of patients from the age group >35-≤45 years was 62.7%. Among all patients, 46.9% had only T2DM; however, 53.1% of patients had T2DM with other comorbidities (T2DM with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and both). The majority of patients had elevated body mass index (BMI) (overweight, 46.6%; and obese, 22.9%). Family history of T2DM (68.1%) was most common in overall population. Sedentary lifestyle (63.1%), alcohol consumption (38.9%), and regular smoking (23.1%) were the most common associations in patients with T2DM with dyslipidemia and hypertension. Uncontrolled HbA1c level (≥7%) were observed in 79.2% of patients. The level of HbA1c was significantly increased with the duration of T2DM and sedentary lifestyle (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI, family history of T2DM, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and smoking were the most common risk facors, while hypertension and dyslipidemia were the most prevalent comorbidities associated with T2DM in young Indian adults.

Real-World Clinical Experience on the Usage of High-Dose Metformin (1500-2500 mg/day) in Type 2 Diabetes Management.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical effectiveness and safety of high doses of metformin (1500-2500 mg/day) in Indian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicentric (n = 241), real-world study included patients with T2DM (aged >18 years) receiving high doses of metformin. Details were retrieved from patient's medical records. RESULTS: Out of 5695 patients, 62.7% were men with median age was 50.0 years. Hypertension (67.5%) and dyslipidemia (48.7%) were the prevalent comorbidities. Doses of 2000 mg (57.4%) and 1500 mg (29.1%) were the most commonly used doses of metformin and median duration of high-dose metformin therapy was 24.0 months. Metformin twice daily was the most frequently used dosage pattern (94.2%). Up-titration of doses was done in 96.8% of patients. The mean HbA1c levels were significantly decreased post-treatment (mean change: 1.08%; P < .001). The target glycemic control was achieved in 91.2% patients. A total of 83.0% had decreased weight. Adverse events were reported in 156 patients. Physician global evaluation of efficacy and tolerability showed majority of patients on a good to excellent scale (98.2% and 97.7%). CONCLUSION: Clinical effectiveness and safety of a high-dose metformin was demonstrated through significant improvement in HbA1c levels and weight reduction.

Data on vildagliptin and vildagliptin plus metformin combination in type-2 diabetes mellitus management.

It is of interest to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin as monotherapy and combination therapy of vildagliptin and metformin for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in Indian settings. The study included patients with T2DM (aged >18 years) receiving vildagliptin monotherapy and vildagliptin in combination with metformin therapy of various strengths. Data related to demographics, risk factors, medical history, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and medical therapies were retrieved from medical records. Out of 9678 patients (median age, 52.0 years), 59.1% were men. A combination of vildagliptin and metformin (50/500 mg) was the most commonly used therapy (54.8%), and the median duration of therapy was 24.0 months. The predominant reason for selecting vildagliptin therapy was to improve HbA1c levels (87.8%). A total of 87.5% of patients required dosage up-titration. Vildagliptin therapy was used in patients with T2DM and associated complications (peripheral neuropathy, CAD, nephropathy, retinopathy, autonomous neuropathy, stroke/TIA, and peripheral artery disease). Among 5175 patients who experienced body weight changes, a majority of patients showed a loss of weight (68.6%). The target glycemic control was achieved in 95.3% of patients. The mean HbA1c levels were significantly decreased post-treatment (mean change: 1.34%; p<0.001). Adverse events were reported in 0.4% of patients. Physicians rated the majority of patients as good to excellent on the global evaluation of efficacy and tolerability scale (98.9%, each). Vildagliptin as monotherapy and combination therapy of vildagliptin and metformin was an effective therapy in reducing HbA1c helps in achieving target glycemic control, and was well tolerated in Indian patients with T2DM continuum.

Risk Factors and Comorbidities in Young Indian Patients with Hypertension: REAL YOUNG (Hypertension) Study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the risk factors and comorbidities among the young Indian adults with hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentric real-world study which included patients diagnosed with and receiving treatment for hypertension. Data were collected from the medical records of clinics/hospitals across 623 study sites in India. Patients of either sex and aged 18-45 years were included. Demographic details (age, sex, anthropometric measurement), medical and family history, sedentary lifestyle, smoking status and alcohol consumption data were extracted. Descriptive and comparative analysis (Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared test) was done. RESULTS: Out of 15,006 young patients diagnosed with hypertension (men=63.6%), 65.7% belonged to the age group of >35-45 years. The median body mass index was 27.0 kg/m2. Patients diagnosed with only hypertension were 29.1% while other predominant comorbidities with hypertension were diabetes mellitus (42.4%) and dyslipidemia (7.8%). Hypertension with diabetes mellitus were prevalent in the age group of >35-45 years (43.8%). More than half of the patients with hypertension (n=7656) had a sedentary lifestyle. Overall, 35.6%, 47.3%, and 56.7% of the patients were alcoholic, smokers (present and former), and had a family history of hypertension, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results showed that among the young population, hypertension was common in the age group of >35-45 years and diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia were common comorbidities. Family history, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index may also contribute to hypertension.

Real-World Observational Study of Glimepiride and Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination Along With Insulin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Indian Experience.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a significant burden on both patients and the healthcare system. This study aimed to evaluate the demographics of patients with T2DM receiving different strengths of glimepiride and metformin combination along with insulin. This study also examined the concomitant conditions and therapies, duration of therapies, dosage titration, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, hypoglycemic events, and weight changes during the course of therapy. Methods This retrospective, multicenter (347), observational study included adult patients with T2DM who received glimepiride and metformin combination along with insulin. Data related to demographic characteristics, duration of disease, co-morbidities, concomitant medications, and dosage pattern was collected from medical records authenticated by physicians during routine care. Results A total of 7058 patients were included in the study. The median age of included patients was 55 years and around 29% were aged >60 years and 60% were men. The majority of patients (83.3%) had insulin treatment initiation after glimepiride and metformin combination while other patients (16.7%) received glimepiride and metformin combination after insulin initiation. The mean HbA1c levels significantly decreased with a mean change of 1.33%. In one-third of the patients, down-titration of the insulin dose was done, indicating the insulin-sparing effect with the addition of the glimepiride and metformin combination. The most common comorbid condition was hypertension (64.7%). Of 3705 patients, 33.2% patients had weight loss and 66.8% had weight gain. A total of 432 patients reported hypoglycemic events. Physician global evaluation of efficacy and tolerability showed a good to excellent on the scale (97.3% and 96.6%). Conclusion This study presented good HbA1c lowering with glimepiride and metformin combination with insulin, ensuring a positive clinical outcome. Good to excellent efficacy and tolerability were observed in patients with T2DM across the age groups, in early as well as long-standing disease.

Clinical data analysis of telmisartan for hypertension management in Indian population.

It is of interest to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical effectiveness, and safety of telmisartan as a monotherapy or as part of combination therapy in Indian adults (>18 years old) with hypertension. All patients were receiving telmisartan as monotherapy, or as a combination therapy for hypertension management. Demographics, risk factors, existing comorbidity, and ongoing medical therapies were retrieved from the patients' medical records. A total of 8607 patients with hypertension (median age, 51.0 years) were part of the study. The gender distribution suggested, 5534(64.3%) patients were male, and 3073 (35.7%) were female patients. The excess salt intake (39.0%) was the most common risk factor according to the results. The analysis revealed telmisartan dual therapy (57.9%) as the most prescribed therapy, followed by monotherapy (32.5%), and triple therapy (9.6%). Further, telmisartan 40mg (21.3%) and telmisartan 40mg plus amlodipine 5mg (17.6%) were the most commonly prescribed therapies. The data suggested that only 17.2% of patients required dose titration. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg) were significantly decreased with monotherapy (mean change: 19.8 [15.1] mmHg and 8.8[8.2] mmHg), dual therapy (mean change: 23.7 [16.6] mmHg and 10.3[8.5] mmHg), and triple therapy (mean change: 28.6 [19.0] mmHg and 12.1[10.8] mmHg) after the treatment (P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of the patients were compliant, and 97.6% achieved the target blood pressure goal with telmisartan-based therapy. There were 157 adverse events reported altogether. The Physicians' global evaluation of efficacy and tolerability showed the majority of the patients receiving telmisartan-based therapy on a good to excellent scale. Telmisartan used as a monotherapeutic agent or as a part of combination therapy was successful and effective in reducing blood pressure and achieving the blood pressure target. Irrespective of the patient's age, duration, and stages of hypertension, the study resulted in a good to excellent scale in efficacy and tolerability in the Indian patients having hypertension.

Glimepiride and Metformin Combinations in Diabetes Comorbidities and Complications: Real-World Evidence.

Objective To evaluate the usage of various strengths of glimepiride and metformin fixed-dose combinations in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with comorbidities and complications. Methods A retrospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric real-world study included T2DM patients (age > 18 years) taking glimepiride and metformin fixed-dose combinations. Age, duration of diabetes, diabetes complications, comorbidities (hypertension and dyslipidemia), dosage frequency, and concomitant medications were analyzed from medical charts. Results A total of 4858 T2DM patients were included, with a mean age of 52.67 years and males being predominant in the study population (60.85%). The laboratory investigations showed a mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.5, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol of 104.81 ± 38.19 mg/dL, and serum creatinine of 0.88 ± 0.26 mg/dL. Around 2055 (42.30%) T2DM patients were hypertensive, and telmisartan alone and a telmisartan-based combination were the drugs of choice for hypertension management. Similarly, 1073 (22.08%) T2DM patients were having dyslipidemia and were primarily managed with rosuvastatin and its combination in 664 (62%) patients. Macrovascular complications were observed in 339 (6.97%) T2DM patients, among which coronary artery disease (CAD) had maximum prevalence, affecting 273 (5.61%) T2DM patients. Microvascular complications were 1010 (20.79%) T2DM patients, among which neuropathy had affected a maximum of 686 (14.12%) followed by retinopathy (2.34%) and nephropathy (1.81%). Among the available 11 strengths, the glimepiride 2 mg and metformin 500 mg combination were most widely prescribed in 1297 (26.69%), followed by glimepiride 1 mg and metformin 500 mg in 1193 (24.57%) patients, and the preferred dosage pattern was twice a daily in 2665 (54.85%) T2DM patients. An age-wise prescription analysis showed that glimepiride and metformin combinations were the preferred choice for the management of diabetes across all the age groups. Conclusion The real-world evidence in the Indian clinical setting indicates that glimepiride and metformin fixed-dose combinations are widely used in the management in T2DM patients with comorbidities like hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes complications. Glimepiride and metformin fixed-dose combinations are suitable for early as well as long-standing diabetes.

Risk factors, comorbiditiEs and Atherogenic dysLipidaemia in Indian YOUNG patients with dyslipidaemia attending hospital/clinic: REAL YOUNG (dyslipidaemia) study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of dyslipidaemia, risk factors, and comorbidities in young Indian adults with dyslipidaemia. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-centric real-world study included individuals with dyslipidaemia, aged 18 - 45 years, attending to 623 hospitals/clinics across India. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records to note demographics, risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, family history of dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension), and clinical details (height, weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C)).A descriptive analysis and comparative analysis (Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test) were done. RESULTS: Of the total 8135 patients, the majority were men (65.0%). Overall, 87.1% of population had one or multiple comorbidities which included the presence of dyslipidaemia alone (12.9%), dyslipidaemia with diabetes and hypertension (39.1%), dyslipidaemia with diabetes (33.6%), and dyslipidaemia with hypertension (14.4%). Sedentary lifestyle was prevalent observation in >50% of the population. Youngest age (18 - 25) group had higher prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (63.2%), high LDL-C levels (56.8%), and low HDL-C levels (64.6%), while patients from the age group >25 to ≤35 years had the highest incidence of hypercholesterolemia (66.6%). Atherogenic dyslipidaemia was observed in 41.9%, 25.5%, and 23.2% of patients from age groups of ≥18 to ≤25, >25 to ≤35, and >35 to ≤45 years, respectively. Patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% had significantly higher levels of TG, TC, LDL-C, and lower HDL-C compared to those with HbA1c <6.5%. CONCLUSION: Hypertriglyceridemia, high LDL-C, low HDL-C, and atherogenic dyslipidaemia were prevalent in the young Indian cohort and sedentary lifestyle, and HbA1c ≥ 6.5% were the predominant risk factors of dyslipidaemia.

Management of Diabetic Foot in an Indian Clinical Setup: An Opinion Survey.

Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate foot-care practices by physicians throughout India who had participated in the Diabetic Foot Education Program (DFEP). Methods A structured questionnaire was administered to physicians throughout India, and their responses were analyzed descriptively. Results A total of 377 doctors responded to the DFEP opinion survey, including 261 doctors who belonged to independent diabetic foot clinics. Of these doctors, 44.4% reported managing fewer than five diabetic foot patients per week and 42.8% reported managing 5-10 patients per week. Most of these patients had non-ischemic foot, followed by those with ischemic and Charcot foot. About 58% of these physicians reported performing comprehensive clinical examinations and providing optimal preventive and therapeutic care in the treatment of diabetic foot, whereas only 25.7% reported performing only callus removal and changing dressings. Basic instruments to manage diabetic foot included the monofilament, tuning fork, biothesiometer, handheld Doppler, and pedometer, which were used by 76%, 75.5%, 59.5%, 27.7%, and 12.8% of doctors, respectively. The most common comorbidities were neuropathy, reported by 333 doctors, followed by peripheral vascular disease, reported by 297 doctors. Tools for diabetic foot education included posters in the clinic, used by 75% of doctors; pamphlets, used by 56.2%; videos, used by 45.2%; and diabetic foot applications, used by 36.7% of doctors. Conclusions There is a need to promote diabetic foot awareness and implement foot-care strategies to prevent diabetic foot and effectively manage this condition. Diabetic foot education programs will encourage clinicians to effectively use diagnostic tools for assessment and management of diabetic foot and to establish independent diabetic foot clinics.

Cardiac rehabilitation knowledge, awareness, and practice among cardiologists in India.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) use is extremely low in India, and beyond. The reasons are multifactorial, including healthcare provider factors. This study examined CR perceptions among cardiologists in India. Attendees of the 2017 Cardiology Society of India conference completed a survey. Of 285 respondents, just over one-fourth had a CR program at their institution, with a similar proportion reporting someone dedicated to providing CR advice to their patients. Only 11 (3.9%) were correct in their responses to 4 multiple choice questions regarding secondary prevention. On average, cardiologists referred 20-30% of their patients, with the greatest barrier to referral being patient disinterest.