Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A real-world analysis from the National Inpatient Sample database.

Background: Pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous or surgical-based intervention remains an important complication of a leadless pacemaker implantation. Objective: The study sought to determine real-world prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes of pericardial effusion requiring intervention in leadless pacemaker implantations. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations during the years 2016 to 2020. The outcomes assessed in our study included prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention, other procedural complications, and in-hospital outcomes. Predictors of pericardial effusion were also analyzed. Results: Pericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in a total of 325 (1.1%) leadless pacemaker implantations. Patient-level characteristics that predicted development of a serious pericardial effusion included >75 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.75), female sex (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.62-2.55), coagulopathy (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-1.99), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.94), and connective tissue disorders (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.02-4.39). Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was independently associated with mortality (OR 5.66, 95% CI 4.24-7.56), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.73), and increased cost of hospitalization (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.92-3.21) after leadless pacemaker implantation. Conclusion: In a large, contemporary, real-world cohort of leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.1%. Certain important patient-level characteristics predicted development of a significant pericardial effusion, and such effusions were associated with adverse outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantations.

Association of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease with procedural complications and inpatient outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantations across the United States.

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemakers have emerged as a promising alternative to transvenous pacemakers in patients with kidney disease. However, studies investigating leadless pacemaker outcomes and complications based on kidney dysfunction are limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with inpatient complications and outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantations. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with CKD and ESRD who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States from 2016 to 2020. Study end points assessed included inpatient complications, outcomes, and resource utilization of leadless pacemaker implantations. RESULTS: A total of 29,005 leadless pacemaker placements were identified. Patients with CKD (n = 5245 [18.1%]) and ESRD (n = 3790 [13.1%]) were younger than patients without CKD and had higher prevalence of important comorbidities. In crude analysis, ESRD was associated with higher prevalence of major complications, peripheral vascular complications, and inpatient mortality. After multivariable adjustment, CKD and ESRD were associated with inpatient mortality (CKD: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.40-1.86]; ESRD: aOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]) and prolonged length of stay (CKD: aOR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.46-1.66]; ESRD: aOR, 1.81 [95% CI 1.67-1.96]). ESRD was also associated with higher hospitalization costs (aOR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.50-1.77) and major complications (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57) after leadless pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation had CKD or ESRD. CKD and ESRD were associated with greater length and cost of stay and inpatient mortality.

Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-level transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve at the tragus is antiarrhythmic and anti-inflammatory in animals and humans. Preliminary studies show that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is beneficial in animal models of postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). OBJECTIVES: In this study the authors conducted a sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial to examine the effect of tVNS on POTS over a 2-month period relative to sham stimulation. METHODS: tVNS (20 Hz, 1 mA below discomfort threshold) was delivered using an ear clip attached to either the tragus (active; n = 12) or the ear lobe (sham; n = 14) for 1 hour daily over a 2-month period. Postural tachycardia was assessed during the baseline and 2-month visit. Heart rate variability based on 5-minute electrocardiogram, serum cytokines, and antiautonomic autoantibodies were measured at the respective time points. RESULTS: Mean age was 34 ± 11 years (100% female; 81% Caucasian). Adherence to daily stimulation was 83% in the active arm and 86% in the sham arm (P > 0.05). Postural tachycardia was significantly less in the active arm compared with the sham arm at 2 months (mean postural increase in heart rate 17.6 ± 9.9 beats/min vs 31.7 ± 14.4 beats/min; P = 0.01). Antiadrenergic autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines were lower in the active arm compared with the sham arm at 2 months (P < 0.05). Heart rate variability was better in the active arm. No device-related side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the emerging paradigm of noninvasive neuromodulation to treat POTS. Mechanistically, this effect appears to be related to reduction of antiautonomic autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines, and improvement in autonomic tone. Further studies are warranted. (Autoimmune Basis for Postural Tachycardia Syndrome; NCT05043051).

Intracranial bleeding and associated outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Insights from National Inpatient Sample 2016-2020.

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has proved to be a safer alternative for long-term anticoagulation; however, patients with a history of intracranial bleeding were excluded from large randomized clinical trials. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a history of intracranial bleeding undergoing percutaneous LAAO. Methods: National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes were used to identify patients with AF who underwent LAAO during the years 2016-2020. Patients were stratified based on a history of intracranial bleeding vs not. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization. Result: A total of 89,300 LAAO device implantations were studied. Approximately 565 implantations (0.6%) occurred in patients with a history of intracranial bleed. History of intracranial bleeding was associated with a higher prevalence of overall complications and in-patient mortality in crude analysis. In the multivariate model adjusted for potential confounders, intracranial bleeding was found to be independently associated with in-patient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-10.82); overall complications (aOR 1.74; 95% CI 1.36-2.24); prolonged length of stay (aOR 2.38; 95% CI 1.95-2.92); and increased cost of hospitalization (aOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.08-1.52) after percutaneous LAAO device implantation. Conclusion: A history of intracranial bleeding was associated with adverse outcomes after percutaneous LAAO. These data, if proven in a large randomized study, can have important clinical consequences in terms of patient selection for LAAO devices.

Association of heart failure with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes from left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the national inpatient sample of 62 980 procedures.

AIMS: To determine outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with concomitant heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2019. LAAO device implantations were identified on the basis of ICD-10-CM code of 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, in-patient mortality, and resource utilization. A total of 62 980 LAAO device implantations were studied. HFpEF (14.4%, n = 9040) and HFrEF (11.2%, n = 7100) were associated with a higher prevalence of major complications and in-patient mortality in crude analysis. In the multivariate model adjusted for potential confounders, HFpEF and HFrEF were not associated with major complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.16 and aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.21] or in-patient mortality (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 0.85-2.55 and aOR 1.26, 95% CI 0.67-2.38). HFpEF and HFrEF were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) > 1 day (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31-1.53 and aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.53-1.80) and increased hospitalization costs > median cost 24 752$ (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.19-1.34 and aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HF in AF patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO was approximately 26%. HF was not independently associated with major complications and in-patient mortality but was associated with prolonged LOS and higher hospitalization costs.

Catheter Ablation for Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Systolic Function: Analysis of Inpatient Mortality, Resource Utilization and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown improvement in hard clinical end points when catheter ablation (CA) is employed as a management strategy for certain atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data, however, exist in this realm outside the controlled clinical trial settings. We sought to determine real-world data on mortality and complications after utilization of CA in such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were derived from National Inpatient Sample from January 2008 to August 2015. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared among HFrEF and AF patients undergoing CA or not. Propensity matching was done to mitigate selection bias and balance confounding variables. Various CA related complications were assessed. Logistic regression was done to determine predictors of mortality in our study cohort. A total of 2,569,919 patients were analyzed and a total of 7773 patients underwent CA. Mortality was significantly better in CA group in both unmatched (1.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.01) and propensity matched cohorts (1.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). Overall complication rate was 10.2% in CA cohort and primarily driven by cardiac and neurological etiologies. In regression analysis, CA remained a strong predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.301, 95% CI 0.184-0.494). CONCLUSIONS: CA is associated with improved mortality in admitted AF patients with concomitant HFrEF. Overall complication rate after CA was modest at 10.2%. Consideration can be given to the utilization of this therapeutic modality in hospitalized AF patients with concomitant HFrEF.