Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(4): 102994, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33639448

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Analyze Extrusion&Exposion (E&E), its implications in the functional, anatomical results and subjective discomfort in OSA patients treated with Barbed Reposition Pharyngoplasty (BRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 488 patients treated with BRP or multilevel TORS. Stratafix wire was used in 230 patients, V-Loc in 258. E&E, timing and localization evaluated at follow-up. Polygraphy used to assess the impact of E&E on functional results, PPOPS questionnaire used for subjective discomfort. RESULTS: E&E in the entire group was 18,4%, with significant difference between Stratafix and V-Loc wire (p = 0,002), but not between BRP alone and multilevel surgery (p = 0,68). 28,9% of extrusion happened within the first seven days, 76,7% between seven days and two months, 5,5% after two months. Symptomatic clinical profile has been seen in 62,2%, asymptomatic one in 37,8% of patients. 35,5% of E&E were localized in tonsillar bed, 46,7% in soft palate and 20% in other sites. Mean delta-AHI of E&E patients was -15,87 ± 16.82 compared with one of those who did not have E&E was -16.34 ± 22,77 (p = 0,38). Mean PPOPS of 183 patients analyzed was 12,32 ± 4,96. Mean PPOPS of extruded group was 12,94 ± 4,68 and 11,92 ± 5,11 in not extruded one (p = 0,166). CONCLUSIONS: E&E are suture-type sensitive (V-Loc > Stratafix), reported more frequent when BRP is performed alone than BRP-TORS with no statistical significance. 76,7% of the E&E occur after patient discharge and within 2 months. About half of the E&E were localized in soft palate. There is no need to fear Extrusion&Exposition because it does not affect in a negative way subjective and PSG outcome.


Subject(s)
Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Palate, Soft/surgery , Pharynx/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Sutures/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(3): 883-891, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32914257

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis study was designed to analyze the olfactory function in obstructive sleep apnea patients (OSA). METHODS: A comprehensive review of the English language literature regarding OSA patients and olfactory function/dysfunction was performed. The papers assessing olfactory dysfunction with Sniffin' Sticks test were taken into consideration. RESULTS: A total of 420 OSA patients were judged eligible for the study. The average TDI score was found to be 24.3 ± 5.6. The olfactory identification (OD), the olfactory discrimination (OD), and the olfactory threshold (OT) average values were calculated resulting 9.9 ± 2.1, 9.8 ± 1.5, and 5.3 ± 2, respectively. There were 161 healthy control subjects in this meta-analysis. The average TDI of the control group was 30.7 ± 6.0 showing a statistical difference with the group of OSA patients (p = 0.03). A linear correlation between Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) increase and TDI decrease (R2 = 0.1, p = 0.05) was detected. Finally, the average values of TDI of 151 patients classified as mild-moderate OSA and 159 patients considered as severe OSA were calculated. The difference between these two groups resulted not statistically significant (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The comparison between OSA patients and healthy subjects using Sniffin' Sticks test showed lower values of the various olfactory parameters. Although a linear correlation between AHI increase and olfactory dysfunction was observed, no statistical difference between mild-moderate and severe OSA patients in terms of the severity of olfactory dysfunction could be proved.


Subject(s)
Olfaction Disorders , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Smell
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(5): e432-e434, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33229992

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the ear pose a diagnostic challenge because clinical symptoms are no specific. Definite diagnosis is made by histopathological analysis with immunohystochemical evalutation. Therapy consists in a complete surgical resection. Controversial terminology of the neoplasm arises from the differentiation of these tumors composed of both endocrine and exocrine glands. Middle ear localization is an extremely rare presentation but less aggressive than gastrointestinal tract or lung localizations which are the most frequent. Radio-diagnostic analyses are necessary follow-up for preventing or detecting recurrence or metastasis. The authors present a case of neuroendocrine tumor of the middle ear in a young male of 37 years old who presented unilateral right hearing loss and tinnitus. A transcanal tympanoplasty was performed. There were no intraoperative complications and the postoperative period was uneventful.


Subject(s)
Adenoma , Ear Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Adult , Ear Neoplasms/surgery , Ear, Middle/diagnostic imaging , Ear, Middle/surgery , Hearing Loss, Conductive/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Conductive/etiology , Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery
4.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ; 40(5): 317-324, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant impact on healthcare systems worldwide. The rate of infected healthcare workers is > 10% in Italy. Within this dramatic scenario, the development of new personal protective equipment (PPE) devices is mandatory. This study focuses on validation of modified full-face snorkel masks (MFFSM) as safe and protective equipment against SARS-CoV-2 infection during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on the upper aerodigestive tract. METHODS: Five different MFFSM were tested during otolaryngological surgery and in anaesthesia procedures. Data were collected through an online survey to assess the feedback of operators. pO2 and pCO2 monitoring values during procedures were recorded in selected cases. RESULTS: All five MFFSM tested were easy to use and gave all operators a sound "feeling" of protection. All clinicians involved had common agreement regarding safety and the user-friendly format. CONCLUSIONS: In the future, specific development of different type of masks for protection in the operating room, intensive care units and/or office will be possible as a joint venture between clinicians and developers. Goals for clinicians include better definition of needs and priorities, while developers can devote their expertise to produce devices that meet medical requirements.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Masks , Operating Rooms , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , COVID-19/epidemiology , Equipment Design , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...