Challenging the in-vivo assessment of biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix: A critical analysis of ultrasound based quasi-static procedures.

Measuring the stiffness of the uterine cervix might be useful in the prediction of preterm delivery, a still unsolved health issue of global dimensions. Recently, a number of clinical studies have addressed this topic, proposing quantitative methods for the assessment of the mechanical properties of the cervix. Quasi-static elastography, maximum compressibility using ultrasound and aspiration tests have been applied for this purpose. The results obtained with the different methods seem to provide contradictory information about the physiologic development of cervical stiffness during pregnancy. Simulations and experiments were performed in order to rationalize the findings obtained with ultrasound based, quasi-static procedures. The experimental and computational results clearly illustrate that standardization of quasi-static elastography leads to repeatable strain values, but for different loading forces. Since force cannot be controlled, this current approach does not allow the distinction between a globally soft and stiff cervix. It is further shown that introducing a reference elastomer into the elastography measurement might overcome the problem of force standardization, but a careful mechanical analysis is required to obtain reliable stiffness values for cervical tissue. In contrast, the maximum compressibility procedure leads to a repeatable, semi-quantitative assessment of cervical consistency, due to the nonlinear nature of the mechanical behavior of cervical tissue. The evolution of cervical stiffness in pregnancy obtained with this procedure is in line with data from aspiration tests.

Radiofrequency ablation permits an effective treatment for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become an important adjunct to modern liver surgery. However, scant knowledge on long-term outcome of RFA for colorectal liver metastasis is available, nowadays. METHODS: This is a prospective clinical study of patients with liver metastasis of colorectal cancer who were treated by RFA between April 1, 1998, and November 30, 2004. Forty-seven patients with 147 liver metastases were treated with RFA in a total of 70 interventions. A metastasis resection was not feasible in 80% of the interventions. All the patients were followed up at regular intervals with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and laboratory tests including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). RESULTS: No RFA-related mortality occurred. The median follow-up time after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 33 months. The RFA-related morbidity was 7%. After the RFA, the expected median overall survival rate is, to date, 39 months. Overall survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 88%, 80% and 57%, respectively. Local recurrence rates reached 8.8% overall and 1.6% for metastasis smaller than 3cm in diameter. No local recurrence occurred for metastasis smaller than 3cm in diameter if treated with the newest RFA device. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent local tumour control was achieved with radiofrequency ablation of small liver metastasis. The expected overall survival rate of patients with RFA for unresectable or non-resected colorectal liver metastasis improved in comparison with the survival rate reported following the natural course (best supportive care) or chemotherapy. The low local recurrence rate of metastases of less than 3cm challenges the results obtained by the more invasive treatment of conventional liver surgery.