Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 25(1): 90-96, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35046201

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Comparison of the use of I-gel and Laringeal Mask Airway (LMA) Protector in laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding the time and ease of insertion for supraglottic airway devices (SAD) and gastric tube (GT), airway sealing capacity, and postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. After anesthesia induction, LMA Protector was inserted in Group LPRO (LMA Protector) (n = 33) and I-gel was inserted in Group IGEL (I-gel) (n = 31) patients. Time of SAD insertion, number of attempts, time, and ease of GT insertion were recorded. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) were measured at the time of SAD insertion, 10 min after insertion, 10 min after pneumoperitoneum, and just before the termination of pneumoperitoneum. The presence of bloodstains on SAD, sore throat, hoarseness, nausea, and pain in swallowing was assessed postoperatively. A P value of < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. RESULT: Two patients in Group LPRO needed endotracheal intubation and were excluded from the study. The SAD insertion time was shorter in Group IGEL than in Group LPRO (13 ± 7.4 s vs. 18.8 ± 9.8 s). The number of attempts and success rate on the first attempt were similar in both groups. GT insertion time was shorter in Group IGEL than Group LPRO (11 ± 7.7 s vs. 21 ± 11 s). The insertion of GT was easier in Group IGEL. The OLP levels decreased during the pneumoperitoneum in Group LPRO while they remained constant in Group IGEL. CONCLUSION: We observed that I-gel offers more stable airway sealing and easier GT insertion advantages when compared with LMA Protector in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Laryngeal Masks , Pharyngitis , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal , Prospective Studies
2.
Bratisl Lek Listy ; 116(7): 433-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26286246

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Investigating the effects of coenzyme Q10 on organ damage and survival on mice in cecal ligation perforation (CLP) model in sepsis. BACKGROUND: Coenzyme Q10 is an antioxidant molecule playing an important role in mitochondria. Mitochondrial dysfunction is an important mechanism in sepsis pathophysiology. METHODS: Nintyfour Swiss Albino male mice were divided into 8 groups. CLP was performed in Group I. Coenzyme Q10, 100 mg/kg subcutaneously, was given 5 hours after CLP to Group II and 20 hours after CLP to Group III. Sham operation was performed in Group IV, 100 mg/kg coenzyme Q10 subcutaneously was given 5 hours after sham operation to Group V and 20 hours after sham operation to Group VI. No operation was performed in Group VII; coenzyme Q10, 100 mg/kg subcutaneously, was given to Group VIII. Antibiotics and fluid replacement were applied for 3 days. The mice still living were sacrificed at 576th hour. The organ damages were scored under light microscopy. RESULTS: The survival of Group I and Group II was lower than that of the control groups, but the survival in the Group III was similar to control groups. It was established that spleen, kidney, heart damage and total organ damage were decreased when compared to CLP group. CONCLUSIONS: Coenzyme Q10 is effective in decreasing histological organ damage in sepsis (Tab. 3. Fig. 1, Ref. 30).


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Intestinal Perforation/drug therapy , Intestinal Perforation/pathology , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/pathology , Ubiquinone/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Heart/drug effects , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/pathology , Male , Mice , Myocardium/pathology , Spleen/drug effects , Spleen/pathology , Ubiquinone/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...