ABSTRACT
The optimal reconstruction protocol after total gastrectomy is still a matter of debate. Pouch reconstructions are developed to create a larger reservoir for food, to provide a barrier against intestinoesophageal reflux, and to lengthen the food transit time. Preservation of the duodenal passage should result in better physiologic regulation of the ingested food. Controlled randomized clinical studies must be conducted to assess the quality of life after gastrectomy and various types of reconstruction. In the present trial, which compared Longmire's reconstruction without a pouch and Longmire's reconstruction with a pouch of varying sizes, we evaluated the quality of life for 41 patients during the first postoperative year. The quality of life was examined by an EORTC questionnaire and an organ-specific module. There were no statistically proven benefits for pouch reconstruction in comparison with Longmire's reconstruction alone. Some benefits are shown for the large pouch but it was only a trend. This is especially so with regard to diarrhea and food consumption. A definitive answer to the question about the value of a pouch reconstruction after gastrectomy has not yet been attained. It is possible that there will be significant differences between reconstruction groups during the long-term follow-up.
