Discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: results from a prospective cohort from two French tertiary referral centres.

AIM: Using a prospective database of discoid resection performed in two tertiary referral centres, the aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, short-term complication rates and clinical outcomes, including voiding dysfunction, of the procedure. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort database was conducted from February 2010 to October 2017 in two tertiary referral centres. One hundred and forty-eight consecutive patients scheduled for colorectal endometriosis by discoid resection were enrolled. The median follow-up was 21 months. All the women underwent complete preoperative assessment (MRI, transvaginal ultrasonography and rectal echo-endoscopy) before the removal of colorectal endometriosis. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system as minor (grades I and II) or major (grades IIIA, IIIB and IV). Cases of voiding dysfunction were also noted. RESULTS: The procedure was abandoned in seven patients. In 91 (64.5%) of the remaining 141 patients, the diameter of discoid resection removed was ≥ 30 mm. Surgery was performed by laparoscopy in 137/141 cases (92.7%). Grade I-III complications were observed in 37 patients (26.2%) with 11 grade IIIb (7.8%). Postoperative voiding dysfunction occurred in 16 patients (11.3%), 11 of whom required self-catheterization for < 1 month. In a multivariate analysis including age, body mass index, lesion size and history of previous surgery for endometriosis, a history of previous surgery was independently correlated to complication outcome (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that discoid resection is associated with good short-term results for women with colorectal endometriosis in a tertiary referral centre as it is associated with a low rate of postoperative complications.

Management of deep infiltrating endometriosis by laparoscopic route with robotic assistance: 3-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of deep endometriosis surgery using robotic assistance, benefits and limits of this approach. METHOD: Case-series study enrolling patients managed for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) using robotic assistance in our department between September 2011 and March 2014 (NCT02294825). Self-questionnaires including pain and digestive symptoms were filled in preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the series. They represented 54% of patients managed for gynecological disease by laparoscopic route with robotic assistance during the study period, and 14% of patients managed for deep endometriosis in our department. Follow-up averaged 24±8 months, and no patient was lost to follow-up. Thirty-two patients had rectal involvement: rectal shaving was performed in 25 patients, disc excision in 3 and colorectal resection in 4. Three patients had bladder resection. Thirteen patients presented with deep endometriosis of the ureters: ureterolysis was performed in 11 of them, and resection of the ureter followed by reimplantation into the bladder in 2 patients. One major complication (Clavien IIIb) was recorded in a patient presenting with necrosis of the right ureter on postoperative day 5. Nine patients tried to conceive after surgery and 8 have already become pregnant (88.9%). One year after surgery, self-questionnaires revealed a significant decrease in pain symptoms and significant improvement in several item values of gastrointestinal standardized questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of DIE is feasible using robotic assistance. However, data available in the literature and our own experience do not definitively support the hypothesis of the superiority of robotic assistance in the management of DIE.

Multiple nodule removal in multifocal colorectal endometriosis instead of "en bloc" large colorectal resection.

Surgical management of colorectal endometriosis follows the principles of two main philosophies or approaches: radical and conservative. The radical approach has recently been recommended in multifocal colorectal endometriosis, which frequently concerns patients with rectal nodules. However, an alternative conservative management could employ selective retrieval of macroscopic colorectal deep endometriosis nodules by bowel shaving and disc excision, with preservation of the mesorectum. The conservative approach is justified by the evidence that low colorectal resection may lead to postoperative functional digestive symptoms for which management is most challenging. However, there is a lack of data in the literature specifically focusing on patients with multiple excision of deep colorectal endometriosis. No data exist about the minimal length of healthy bowel that should be conserved between two successive transversal bowel sutures, and on consecutive improvement of functional outcomes. Conversely, no evidence exists on presumed reduction of recurrence rate when young patients undergo low large colorectal resection, instead of multiple selective excisions. Further comparative studies would be welcome, among which the ENDORE randomized trial which may play a central role by comparing functional outcomes related to radical and conservative approach in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum.

Improvement of digestive complaints in women with severe colorectal endometriosis benefiting from continuous amenorrhoea triggered by triptorelin. A prospective pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of therapeutic amenorrhoea triggered by triptorelin in the digestive complaints of women with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. DESIGN: Prospective series of consecutive patients with deep endometriosis of the rectum enrolled over a period of 17 consecutive months. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Seventy patients. INTERVENTIONS: Medical therapy (triptorelin 11.25 mg and add-back therapy using estradiol) administered for 3.4±1.8months before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gastrointestinal standardised questionnaires before beginning medical treatment and the day before surgery. RESULTS: The most frequent digestive complaints at baseline were: defecation pain in 77.1% of patients, bloating in 60%, diarrhoea in 54.3% and constipation in 50%. The largest diameter of the rectal area infiltrated by the disease was <1cm in 12.2% of women, 1 to 2.9 cm in 34.3% and ≥3cm in 51.4%. Multiple colorectal nodules were found in 32.9%. Medical treatment led to disappearance of cyclic defecation pain in 78.6%, dyschesia in 58.3%, diarrhoea in 58.3% and bloating in 50%. Relieving digestive complaints was not significantly related to either length of triptorelin administration or size of rectal infiltration by deep endometriosis. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic amenorrhoea averaging 3 months allowed complete improvement of various cyclic digestive complaints in more than half of patients. In selected patients, continuous therapeutic amenorrhoea could compensate for the lack of complete resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum, when this latter is likely to result in a high rate of postoperative morbidity.