[Cervical CUP Syndrome: Diagnosis and Therapy]. / Zervikales CUP-Syndrom: Diagnostik und Therapie.

In CUP syndrome (CUP = cancer of unknown primary) there are 1 or more metastases of a primary tumor that cannot be localized despite extensive diagnostics. CUP syndrome accounts for 5% of all human malignancies, making it one of the 10 most common forms of cancer. In addition to inflammatory lymph node enlargement and benign changes such as cervical cysts, lymph node metastases are among the most common cervical masses. Cervical CUP syndrome is a histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastasis with an unknown primary tumor. In addition to anamnesis, clinical examination and histological confirmation, diagnostics include radiological imaging using PET-CT and panendoscopy with histological primary tumor search. Treatment options include surgical therapy with neck dissection and chemoradiotherapy.

Hypoxia as a stimulus for tissue formation: The concept of organogenesis in microsurgically vascularized tissue engineering constructs.

Axial vascularization of tissue constructs is essential to maintain an adequate blood supply for a stable regeneration of a clinically relevant tissue size. The versatility of the arterio-venous loop (AVL) has been previously shown in various small and large animal models as well as in clinical reports for bone regeneration. We have previously demonstrated the capability of the AVL to induce axial vascularization and to support the nourishment of tissue constructs in small animal models after applying high doses of ionizing radiation comparable to those applied for adjuvant radiotherapy after head and neck cancer. We hypothesize that this robust ability to induce regeneration after irradiation could be related to a state of hypoxia inside the constructs that triggers the HIF1 (hypoxia induced factor 1) - SDF1 (stromal derived factor 1) axis leading to chemotaxis of progenitor cells and induction of tissue regeneration and vascularization. We analyzed the expression of HIF1 and SDF1 via immunofluorescence in axially vascularized bone tissue engineering constructs in Lewis rats 2 and 5 weeks after local irradiation with 9Gy or 15Gy. We also analyzed the expression of various genes for osteogenic differentiation (collagen 1, RUNX, alkaline phosphatase and osteonectin) via real time PCR analysis. The expression of HIF1 and SDF1 was enhanced two weeks after irradiation with 15Gy in comparison to non-irradiated constructs. The expression of osteogenic markers was enhanced at the 5-weeks time point with significant results regarding collagen, alkaline phosphatase and osteonectin. These results indicate that the hypoxia within the AVL constructs together with an enhanced SDF1 expression probably play a role in promoting tissue differentiation. The process of tissue generation triggered by hypoxia in the vicinity of a definite vascular axis with enhanced tissue differentiation over time resembles hereby the well-known concept of organogenesis in fetal life.

Real-time definition of single seed placement sensitivity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: In low-dose-rate brachytherapy, iodine-125 seeds are implanted based on a treatment plan, generated with respect to different dose constraints. The quality of the dose distribution depends on a precise seed placement, however, during treatment planning the impact on the dose parameters when certain seeds fail to be placed precisely is not clear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a method using automatic differentiation to calculate gradients of dose parameters with regard to the seeds' positions. Thus, we understand their sensitivity with respect to the seed placement. A statistical analysis is performed on a data set with 35 prostate brachytherapy patients. RESULTS: The most sensitive seeds regarding the dosimetric parameters of both rectum and urethra are close to the corresponding organ. Their gradient directions are mainly orthogonal to their surfaces. However, not all seeds close to the surface are equally sensitive with regard to the dose parameter. The most sensitive seeds regarding the prostate's dose parameters are distributed throughout the prostate and the direction of the gradients are mainly parallel to its surface. A linear regression with respect to different patient parameters shows that dose constraints which are barely fulfilled have large gradients and thus are additionally sensitive to misplacement. CONCLUSION: Automatic differentiation can be used to analyze dose parameter sensitivity with respect to seed placement. Integrating this into treatment planning systems is valuable as it speeds up the planning procedure, making it more robust and less dependent on user experience while showing the operating physician which needle placements require greater accuracy than others.

Homogenous dose prescription in Gamma Knife Radiotherapy: Combining the best of both worlds.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery with linear accelerators (LINACs) or Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK, Elekta AB) is an established treatment option for intracranial tumors. When those are involving/abutting organs at risk (OAR), homogenous and normofractionated treatments outmatch single fraction deliveries. In such situations, it would be desirable to balance LINAC's homogeneity benefits with LGK's dose gradient attributes. In this study, we determined homogeneity and OAR sparing ranges using a non-clinical, homogenous prototype version of LGK Lightning. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed thirty fractionated LGK Icon in-house patients with acoustic neuromas, pituitary adenomas and meningiomas. Four treatment plans were generated (54 Gy,1.8 Gy/fx) per patient: one LINAC plan, one clinical Lightning plan ("LGK") and two prototype Lightning plans ("LGK Hom" and "LGK OAR"). We analyzed Dmean and D2% for different OAR, Gradient Index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), Homogeneity Index (HI) and beam-on-time (BOT). RESULTS: While the LINAC vs. Lightning plans (LGK Hom|LGK OAR|LGK) boast better homogeneity (median: 1.08 vs. 1.18|1.24|1.35) and shorter BOT (median: 137 s vs. 432 s|510 s|510 s), Lightning plans show improved GI (median: 6.68 vs. 3.86|3.50|3.19), similar PCI (median: 0.75 vs. 0.76|0.75|0.82) and significantly reduced OAR doses. For in-tumor OAR, LGK Hom and LINAC plans achieves similar OAR sparing with improved GI for LGK Hom. CONCLUSIONS: This study is a preliminary attempt to combine the dosimetric advantages of LINAC and LGK treatment planning. We observed that LGK plan homogeneity can be improved toward LINAC standards while maintaining the LGK advantage of favorable OAR doses and GI. Additionally, in-tumor OAR hotspots can be considerably reduced.

Longitudinal cosmetic outcome after planned IORT boost with low kV X-rays-monocentric results from the TARGIT BQR registry.

Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy can serve as an anticipated boost (IORT boost) in combination with a subsequent external whole breast irradiation in high-risk breast cancer patients and is part of many guidelines. Nevertheless, there are only few prospective data available regarding cosmetic outcome after IORT boost using kV X-rays. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cosmetic outcome of patients treated within the prospective phase IV TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy (TARGIT) Boost Quality Registry (BQR) study (NCT01440010) in one center. Methods: In the context of the TARGIT BQR study standardized photos in three positions (arms down, arms up, from the side) were available for different time points. For this analysis a layperson, a radiation oncologist and a gynecologist evaluated available photos at different time points during follow-up with up to 4 years using the Harvard scale (comparison of treated and the untreated breast; rating: excellent, good, fair, poor). Longitudinal results were compared to preoperative results (baseline). Results: Seventy-three patients were available for the analysis. Baseline cosmetic assessment was excellent/good in 98.8% (mean value for all three positions). Postoperative cosmetic outcome (median) was good for all positions and remained constant for 4 years. Around 30% of the patients showed a constant or even improved cosmetic outcome compared to baseline. Only few patients showed a poor result at 4 years. The majority of patients showed an excellent or good cosmetic outcome at all time points. Conclusions: Patients from the prospective TARGIT BQR study treated with IORT boost and additional whole breast irradiation showed good or excellent cosmetic outcomes in most cases during 4 years of follow-up. These results add important information for shared decision making in breast cancer patients.

Prospective Comparison of Hypofractionated Versus Normofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Late Toxicity Results of the Non-Inferiority KOSIMA Trial (ARO2010-3).

Purpose: To compare the late toxicity profile of hypofractionation and normofractionation for whole-breast radiotherapy in breast cancer (BC) patients after conserving surgery. Methods: Sixty-year-old or older patients with pTis-pT3, pN0-pN1a, M0 BC were recruited and stratified to hypofractionated (arm R-HF) or normofractionated (arm L-NF) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), for right- and left-sided BC, respectively, in this single-center, non-randomized, non-inferiority trial. A boost was allowed if indicated. The primary outcome was the cumulative percentage of patients developing grade III fibrosis, grade I telangiectasia, and/or grade II hyperpigmentation after 2 years, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 15% increase from an expected 2-year toxicity rate of 20%. Results: The Median follow-up was 4.93 (0.57-8.65) years for R-HF and 5.02 (0.65-8.72) years for L-NF (p=0.236). The median age was 68 (60-83 and 60-80) years, respectively. In total, 226 patients were recruited (107 for R-HF and 119 for L-NF), with 100 and 117 patients suitable for assessment, respectively. A boost was delivered in 51% and 53% of each arm, respectively. Median PTV volumes were 1013.6 (273-2805) cm3 (R-HF) and 1058.28 (315-2709) cm3 (L-NF, p=0.591). The 2-year primary endpoint rate was 6.1% (95% CI 1.3-11.7, n=5 of 82) and 13.3% (95% CI 7-20.2, n=14 of 105), respectively (absolute difference -7.2%, one-sided 95% CI ∞ to -0.26, favoring R-HF). No local recurrence-free- or overall-survival differences were found. Conclusion: In this prospective non-randomized study, hypofractionation did not have higher toxicity than normofractionated whole-breast IMRT.

Multiple direction needle-path planning and inverse dose optimization for robotic low-dose rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Robotic systems to assist needle placements for low-dose rate brachytherapy enable conformal dose planning only restricted to path planning around risk structures. We report a treatment planning system (TPS) combining multiple direction needle-path planning with inverse dose optimization algorithms. METHODS: We investigated in a path planning algorithm to efficiently locate needle injection points reaching the target volume without puncturing risk structures. A candidate needle domain with all combinations of trajectories is used for the optimization process. We report a modular algorithm for inverse radiation plan optimization. The initial plan with V100>99% is generated by the "greedy optimizer". The "remove-seed algorithm" reduces the number of seeds in the high dose regions. The "depth-optimizer" varies the insertion depth of the needles. The "coverage-optimizer" locates under-dosed areas in the target volume and supports them with an additional amount of seeds. The dose calculation algorithm is benchmarked on an image set of a phantom with a liver metastasis (prescription dose Dpr=100Gy) and is re-planned in a commercial CE-marked TPS to compare the calculated dose grids using a global gamma analysis. The inverse optimizer is benchmarked by calculating 10 plans on the same phantom to investigate the stability and statistical variability of the dose parameters. RESULTS: The path planning algorithm efficiently removes 72.5% of all considered injection points. The candidate needle domain consists of combinations of 1971 tip points and 827 injection points. The global gamma analysis with gamma 1%=2.9Gy, 1mm showed a pass rate of 98.5%. The dose parameters were V100=99.1±0.3%, V150=76.4±2.5%, V200=44.5±5.5% and D90=125.9±3.6Gy and 10.7±1.3 needles with 34.0±0.8 seeds were used. The median of the TPS total running time was 4.4minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS generates treatment plans with acceptable dose coverage in a reasonable amount of time. The gamma analysis shows good accordance to the commercial TPS. The TPS allows taking full advantage of robotic navigation tools to enable a new precise and safe method of minimally invasive low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

A knowledge-based quantitative approach to characterize treatment plan quality: Application to prostate VMAT planning.

PURPOSE: To characterize treatment plan (TP) quality, a quantitative quality control (QC) tool is proposed. The tool is validated using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for treatment of prostate cancer by estimating the achievable organ at risk (OAR) sparing, based on the knowledge learned from prior plans. METHODS: Prostate TP quality was investigated by evaluating the achieved OAR sparing in the rectum and bladder, based on their proximity to target surface. The knowledge base used in this work comprises 450 plans, consisting of 181 homogenous prostate plans and 269 simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) prostate plans. A knowledge-based algorithm was used to relate the absorbed doses of the OARs (rectum and bladder) and their proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A metric (Mq,r value) was calculated to characterize the OAR sparing based on the weighted differences of the mean doses at binned distances to the PTV surface. The 90% probability ellipse of the normally distributed OARs Mq,r values was considered to define a threshold above which the treatment plan was re-optimized. RESULTS: Following re-optimization, 8/11 of the homogenous plans and 6/13 of the SIB plans outside the 90% probability ellipse could be re-optimized to gain better OAR sparing while achieving the same or better target coverage. However, 3/4 of the homogenous TPs and 1/9 of the SIB TPs between 80% and 90% were improved. Mq,r values of bladder and rectum after re-optimizing the plans in both groups of homogenous and SIB showed lower values compared to the corresponding values before re-optimization, which implies that better OARs sparing was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an effective anatomy-specific QC tool for identifying suboptimal plans and determining the achievable OAR sparing for each individual patient anatomy.

Feasibility of interstitial stepping-source electronic brachytherapy to locally inoperable tumors.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is the mainstay in the treatment of locally inoperable tumors. Interstitial electronic needle-based kilovoltage brachytherapy (EBT) could be an economic alternative to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy or permanent seed implantation (PSI). In this work, we evaluated if locally inoperable tumors treated with PSI at our institution may be suitable for EBT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 10 post-interventional computed tomography (CT) scans of patients, who received PSI and simulated stepping-source EBT applied with Intrabeam system and needle applicator were used. EBT treatment planning software with 3-dimensional image and projection of applicator were applied for designing trajectories and establishing dwell positions. Dwell position doses were summarized, and doses covering 90% of the target volume (D90) achieved with stepping-source EBT were compared to those of PSI. Additionally, conformality of dose distributions and total irradiation time were assessed using conformation number (CN) or conformal index (COIN). RESULTS: In all patients, D90 of EBT exceeded the prescribed dose or D90 of PSI on average by 4.7% or 21.3% relative to the prescribed dose, respectively. Mean number of trajectories was 5.0 for EBT and 6.9 for PSI. Average CN/COIN for EBT was 0.69, with a mean irradiation time of 27.8 minutes for standardized dose of 13 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Stepping-source EBT allowed for a conformal treatment of inoperable interstitial tumors with similar D90. Fewer trajectories were required for EBT in majority of cases.

Adjuvant electronic brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma: A 4-year outcomes report.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes of a single-center adjuvant electronic brachytherapy (e-BT) experience for patients with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were retrospectively assessed. Intracavitary e-BT was applied through a cylindrical applicator (diameters 2.5-3.5 cm). e-BT single doses ranged between 4 and 7 Gy (EQD2 ∼ 6-12, α/ß of 10 Gy and an relative biological effectiveness of 1.3) at 5-mm depth. Adverse events are reported at first week, 1-3 months, 3-12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months. The overall survival, disease-free survival, distant disease control rate, and local control rate were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were assessed. The median age was 68 [48-86] years. External beam radiotherapy was added in n = 8 (27.6%) patients. Staging was 13.8% for T1a, 51.7% for T1b, 24.1% for T2, 6.9% for T3a, and 3.4% for T3b. Grading was G3 in 51.7% (n = 15), G2 in 20.7% (n = 6), and G1 in 27.6% (n = 8). Median followup was 47 months [5-88]. Overall Grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity was 89.7% (n = 26), 17.2% (n = 5), and 6.9% (n = 2), respectively. No Grade 3 cystitis or proctitis or any Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred during followup. No local recurrences were detected. Estimated distant disease control rate was 92.1% (n = 2, distant metastasis at 7 and 11 months). Estimated 4-year overall survival was 84.8% (n = 4 events, two unrelated to disease) and disease-free survival was 84.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that e-BT resembles a very-low-toxicity profile and a high local control rate in the adjuvant scenario for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Accelerated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers: Evaluation of Response and Compliance.

PURPOSE: Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) is the primary treatment modality for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer patients (LAHNSCC). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and concurrent chemotherapy is not broadly implicated in our region mainly because of the lack of experience. This study aims at evaluating the response and compliance of this approach in our patients. METHODS: Forty patients with LAHNSCC were included and 50% received induction chemotherapy. All the patients were treated with IMRT-SIB radiotherapy for 70Gy over 33 daily fractions. Weekly cisplatin (40mg/m2) was administered during the radiation course. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 1.5 years, LC was achieved in 82.5% of cases and distant control rate was 90%. More than 5 interrupted radiation sessions and GTV volume > 50 cc significantly affected LRC (P= 0.02 and 0.001 respectively). Eighty percent of cases experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Induction chemotherapy and PTV-70 volume >150 cc significantly affected the degree of toxicities (P=0.018 and 0.0001 respectively).The 2 years disease free survival (DFS) was 77%. ECOG PS, large GTV volume (> 50 cc) and RT interruption (>5 sessions) had negative impact on DFS (P= 0.041, 0.002 and 0.001 respectively). The 2 years overall survival (OS) was 87%. Radiation interruption (> 5 sessions) was the only factor which had significant detrimental effect on OS (P= 0.001). CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy seems to have a negative impact on patient's compliance to CCRT. Bulky tumors and prolonged radiation interruptions were associated with significantly lower LRC, DFS and OS.

Intraoperative radiotherapy with low energy x-rays for primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) resembles a safe and efficient for STS treatment. The first data on electronic-IORT (eIORT) using low-energy photons is herein presented. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with newly and recurrent STS were retrospectively assessed. EIORT was applied with low-energy photons during surgery. The dose was either prescribed to the applicator surface (spherical applicators) or 5 mm depth (flat applicators). Overall progression-free survival (O-PFS), local progression-free survival (L-PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 4.88 (1.0-8.95) years. Twenty-five patients (80.6%) had recurrent STS with prior treatment. The resection status was R1 in 25.8% and R2 in 6.5%. The distribution was 51.7% for extremities, 35.5% for abdomen and pelvis, 9.7% for thorax and 3.2% for head and neck tumors. The median O-PFS was 11.0 months, with 42.6% 5-year estimated O-PFS. The only local recurrence in the primary setting occurred after 22 months. Median L-PFS in recurrent STS was 12.5 months, with 65.5% 5-year estimated L-PFS. The 5-year OS estimated rate was 94.7% (3 events after 7 years). No G3 toxicity related to eIORT was observed. Two patients exhibited G2 acute neuropathic pain. Late neuropathic pain was seen in 6 patients being 3 graded as G1 and 3 as G2. No wound-related toxicity was found. CONCLUSION: Electronic IORT with low-energy photons is a safe treatment option for STS, yielding similar outcomes as historical series reporting IORT with electrons or HDR brachytherapy.

Long-term outcome after intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term oncological outcome and incidence of chronic side effects in patients with breast cancer and intraoperative radiotherapy given as an upfront boost (IORT boost). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 400 patients with an IORT boost with low-energy X­rays (20 Gy), subsequent whole-breast irradiation (46-50 Gy), and annual oncological follow-up. Side effects were prospectively evaluated (LENT-SOMA scales) over a period of up to 15 years. Side effects scored ≥grade 2 at least three times during follow-up were judged to be chronic. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (30-85) and the median follow-up was 78 months (2-180) after IORT boost. In 15 patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a local recurrence rate at 5, 10, and 15 years of 2.0%, 6.6%, and 10.1%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 92.1%, 81.8%, and 80.7%, respectively. The most common high-grade side effects were fibrosis (21%) and pain (8.6%). The majority of side effects occurred within the first 3 years. The actuarial rates of chronic fibrosis were 19.1% and 21.1% at 5 and ≥8 years, of chronic pain 8.6% at ≥4 years, of chronic edema of the breast 2.4% at ≥2 years, of chronic lymphedema 0.0% at 5 and 10 years, and of chronic hyperpigmentation 0.5% at ≥2 years. Side effects were similar or less than expected from an external beam boost. CONCLUSION: IORT boost appears to be a highly efficient and safe method for upfront delivery of the tumor bed boost in high-risk breast cancer patients.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for glioblastoma: an international pooled analysis.

PURPOSE: To report the results of the first international pooled analysis of patients with glioblastoma treated with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in addition to standard of care therapy. METHODS: Data from 51 patients treated at five centers in Germany, China and Peru were analyzed. All patients underwent tumor resection followed by a single application of IORT (10-40 Gy, prescribed to the applicator surface) with low-energy X-rays. Thereafter, standard adjuvant radiochemotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy were applied. Factors of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS (L-PFS; defined as appearance of new lesions ≤1 cm to the cavity border) and distant PFS (D-PFS; lesions >1 cm). The same endpoints were estimated at 1-, 2- and 3-years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, rates and severity (as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0) of radionecrosis (RN) were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years (range: 16-75) and the median Karnofsky Performance Status was 80 (20-100). At a median follow-up of 18.0 months (2-42.4), the median OS, PFS, L-PFS and D-PFS were 18.0 months (95% CI: 14.7-21.3), 11.4 months (95%CI: 7.58-15.22), 16 months (95%CI: 10.21-21.8) and 30.0 months (95%CI: 18.59 - 41.41), respectively. The estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year OS, PFS, L-PFS and D-PFS were 79.5%, 38.7% and 25.6%; 46.2%, 29.4%, and 5.9%; 60.9, 37.9%, and 12.6%; and 76.7%, 65.0%, and 39.0% respectively. First progression occurred locally in only 35.3% of cases. Grade 1 RN was detected in 7.8% and grade 3 in 17.6% of the patients. No grade 4 toxicity was reported and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared to historical data, this pooled analysis suggests improved efficacy and safety of IORT with low-energy X-rays for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Prospective data is warranted to confirm these findings.

Combined kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT) versus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for painful vertebral metastases - a randomized phase III study.

BACKGROUND: The spine is the most frequent location of bone metastases. Local treatment aims at palliation of pain and, given the increased likelihood of long-term cancer survival, at local control. Kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT) provided instantaneous pain relief in 70% of patients at the first day after the intervention and resulted in local control rates of > 93% at 1 year in a recently conducted phase I/II trial. To assess its clinical value, we designed a phase III trial which tests Kypho-IORT against the most widespread standard-of-care, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in patients with painful vertebral metastases. METHODS: This phase III study includes patients ≥50 years of age with up to 4 vertebral metastases and a pain score of at least 3/10 points on the visual/numeric analogy scale (VAS). Patients randomized into the experimental arm (A) will undergo Kypho-IORT (Kyphoplasty plus IORT with 8 Gy prescribed to 13 mm depth). Patients randomized into the control arm (B) will receive EBRT with either 30 Gy in 10 fractions or 8 Gy as a single dose. The primary end point is pain reduction defined as at least - 3 points on the VAS compared to baseline at day 1. Assuming that 40% of patients in the Kypho-IORT arm and 5% of patients in the control arm will achieve this reduction and 20% will drop out, a total of 54 patients will have to be included to reach a power of 0.817 with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints are evaluation of the percentage of patients with a pain reduction of at least 3 points at 2 and 6 weeks, local tumor control, frequency of re-intervention, secondary fractures/sintering, complication rates, skin toxicity/wound healing, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. DISCUSSION: This trial will generate level 1 evidence on the clinical value of a one-stop procedure which may provide instantaneous pain relief, long-term control and shortened intervals to further adjuvant (systemic) therapies in patients with spinal metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT02773966 (Registration date: 05/16/2016).

Ultrafast single breath-hold cone-beam CT lung cancer imaging with faster linac gantry rotation.

PURPOSE: Lung tumors treated with hypo-fractionated deep-inspiration breath-hold stereotactic body radiotherapy benefit from fast imaging and treatment. Single breath-hold cone-beam-CT (CBCT) could reduce motion artifacts and improve treatment precision. Thus, gantry speed was accelerated to 18°/s, limiting acquisition time to 10-20 s. Image quality, dosimetry and registration accuracy were compared with standard-CBCT (3°/s). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For proof-of-concept, image quality was analyzed following customer acceptance tests, CT-dose index measured, and registration accuracy determined with an off-centered ball-bearing-phantom. A lung-tumor patient was simulated with differently shaped tumor-mimicking inlays in a thorax-phantom. Signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast-to-noise-ratio and geometry of the inlays quantified image quality. Dose was measured in representative positions. Registration accuracy was determined with inlays scanned in pre-defined positions. Manual, automatic (clinical software) and objective-automatic (in-house-developed) registration was performed on planning-CT, offsets between results and applied shifts were compared. RESULTS: Image quality of ultrafast-CBCT was adequate for high-contrast areas, despite contrast-reduction of ∼80% due to undersampling. Dose-output was considerably reduced by 60-83% in presented setup; variations are due to gantry-braking characteristics. Registration accuracy was maintained better than 1 mm, mean displacement errors were 0.0 ±â€¯0.2 mm with objective-automatic registration. Ultrafast-CBCT showed no significant registration differences to standard-CBCT. CONCLUSIONS: This study of first tests with faster gantry rotation of 18°/s showed promising results for ultrafast high-contrast lung tumor CBCT imaging within single breath-hold of 10-20 s. Such fast imaging times, in combination with fast treatment delivery, could pave the way for intra-fractional combined imaging and treatment within one breath-hold phase, and thus mitigate residual motion and increase treatment accuracy and patient comfort. Even generally speaking, faster gantry rotation could set a benchmark with immense clinical impact where time matters most: palliative patient care, general reduction in uncertainty, and increase in patient throughput especially important for emerging markets with high patient numbers.

Single-center long-term results from the randomized phase-3 TARGIT-A trial comparing intraoperative and whole-breast radiation therapy for early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Partial breast irradiation using intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) after breast-conserving surgery could be sufficient for a selected group of breast cancer patients. We report the results of a cohort of patients from a single center treated as part of the randomized phase-3 TARGIT-A trial. METHODS: Patients (≥50 years) with cT1 cN0 cM0 and invasive ductal histology on biopsy were randomized between IORT with 20 Gy (arm-A) or postoperative whole-breast RT (WBRT) up to 56 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (arm-B). Postoperatively, patients in arm-A with multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, nodal invasion, extensive intraductal component, invasive lobular carcinoma, or resection margins <1 cm received additional postoperative WBRT. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2012, 184 patients were randomized, of whom 90 in arm-A and 90 in arm-B were evaluated. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. The 5­year overall survival was 94.4% in arm-A and 93.3% in arm-B (p = 0.73). Two local recurrences were observed: one at 70.3 months in an arm-A patient who received IORT + WBRT and another at 4.5 months in an arm-B patient who refused all forms of adjuvant treatment, thus resulting in a 5-year local recurrence of 0% in arm-A and 1.1% in arm-B. The 5­year in-breast recurrence (outside of the index quadrant) was 0% in arm-A and 1.2% in arm-B. Salvage mastectomy was performed successfully in all patients with relapse. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of this single-center cohort consolidates the earlier reports of low local recurrence rates after single-dose IORT. Our results are in line with non-inferiority of risk-adapted IORT for selected patients with early breast cancer.

Long-term changes in blood counts after intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer-single center experience and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer is used as an upfront boost or as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). To date, no description of blood count changes after IORT are available. Our analysis shows blood count changes in breast cancer patients up to 5 years after IORT ± whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS: IORT was given as APBI in 58 patients (IORT/APBI-group) and as a boost in 198 patients (IORT/WBRT-group). A median dose of 20 Gy was given intraoperatively with low energy X-rays [INTRABEAM (TM) System] and additionally 46 Gy/2 Gy per fraction to the whole breast, if WBRT was added. Blood counts were collected preoperatively, after 90 days and through year 1-5 of follow-up. Dunnett's tests were used to calculate changes in blood counts over time. Additionally, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) were calculated for each time point. RESULTS: Significantly decreases in the IORT/WBRT-group were seen for erythrocytes, hemoglobin, platelets and leucocytes and an increase for lymphocytes for the total follow-up period. In the IORT/APBI-group significantly decreases were seen for erythrocytes and hemoglobin for the total follow-up period. Regarding changes during follow-up compared to the preoperative value, much more significant changes were seen in the IORT/WBRT-group compared to IORT/APBI-group without any relevant impact of chemotherapy. Regarding PLR-, NLR- and dNLR-values the rate of patients over the range improved over time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: IORT/APBI seems to have a smaller effect on blood counts compared to IORT/WBRT. Furthermore, PLR-, NLR- and dNLR-values improved over time, suggesting a positive effect on outcome after IORT in general.

Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (INTRAGO): An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase I/II Trial.

BACKGROUND: The median time to recurrence of glioblastoma (GB) following multimodal treatment is ∼7 mo. Nearly all cancers recur locally, suggesting that augmenting local treatments may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to the resection cavity is safe and effective. METHODS: INTRAGO was a phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IORT with 20 to 40 Gy of low-energy photons in addition to standard radiochemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02685605). The primary endpoint was safety as per occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We also performed an exploratory analysis of the local PFS (L-PFS), defined as recurrence within 1 cm of the treated margin. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated at 3 dose levels. Of these, 13 underwent incomplete resection, 6 had unresected satellites, and 3 did not receive per-protocol treatment (PPT). The MGMT promoter was unmethylated in 10 patients. The median follow-up was 13.8 mo. The majority of grade 3 to 5 adverse events were deemed unrelated to IORT. Five cases of radionecrosis were observed, 2 were classified as grade 3 events. Other grade 3 events judged related to radiotherapy (external-beam radiotherapy and/or IORT) were wound dehiscence (n = 1), CSF leakage (n = 1), cyst formation (n = 1). No IORT-related deaths occurred. The median PFS was 11.2 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-17.0) for all patients and 11.3 mo (95% CI: 10.9-11.6) for those receiving PPT. The median L-PFS was 14.3 mo (95% CI: 8.4-20.2) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 9.7-25.9) for those receiving PPT. The median OS was 16.2 mo (95% CI: 11.1-21.4) for all patients and 17.8 mo (95% CI: 13.9-21.7) for those receiving PPT. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that IORT is associated with manageable toxicity. Considering the limitations of a 15-patient phase I/II trial, further studies aimed at assessing an outcome benefit are warranted.