ABSTRACT
Background Free tissue transfer is considered the gold standard option for the reconstruction of distal leg defects. Free tissue transfer using recipient vessels in the contralateral leg (cross-leg bridge) is a potential option to supply the flap if there are no suitable recipient vessels in the injured leg. Most studies have described this technique using end-to-end anastomosis which sacrifices the main vessel in the uninjured leg. This study evaluated the use of a cross-leg free latissimus dorsi muscle flap for the reconstruction of defects in single-vessel legs, using end-to-side anastomosis to recipient vessels in the contralateral leg without sacrificing any vessel in the uninjured leg. Methods This is a retrospective study that included 22 consecutive patients with soft tissue defects over the lower leg. All the reconstructed legs had a single artery as documented by CT angiography. All patients underwent cross-leg free latissimus dorsi muscle flap using end-to-side anastomosis to the posterior tibial vessels of the contralateral leg. Results The age at surgery ranged from 12 to 31 years and the mean defect size was 86 cm 2 . Complete flap survival occurred in 20 cases (91%). One patient had total flap ischemia. Another patient had distal flap ischemia. Conclusion Cross-leg free latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a reliable and safe technique for the reconstruction and salvage of mutilating leg injuries, especially in cases of leg injuries with a single artery. As far as preservation of the donor limb circulation is concerned, end-to-side anastomosis is a reasonable option as it maintains the continuity of the donor leg vessels.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Distal lower limb reconstruction is one of the most difficult and challenging tasks in plastic surgery. Despite the continuous advances in microsurgical techniques, pedicled cross-leg flaps still have a major role particularly in pediatric patients. Many techniques have been described to maximize the potential of the cross-leg flaps. The introduction of fasciocutaneous flaps has provided more potentials and made lower leg reconstruction easier and more successful. The description of perforator system in the leg has also made a revolution in the regional reconstruction. In this report, we present a new modification that increases the reach and facilitates the inset of the flaps. METHODS: The flap is taken from the posteromedial skin of the middle third of the leg. The design is determined by the location, size, and shape of the defect. The base of the flap should contain at least 2 perforators located by Doppler device. After elevation of the fasciocutaneous flap, 2 back cuts are performed in the upper and lower edge of the flap base preserving the 2 previously located perforators. RESULTS: Fifty patients, 32 males and 18 females, were reviewed and presented. Age of the patients ranged from 4 to 13 years and the defect size ranged from 20 to 130 cm. All flaps survived with 3 flaps had mild marginal ischemia, 2 flaps had mild infection, and 1 flap had partial dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Back cuts made at the edges of the base of a cross-leg flap, preserving the feeding perforators, can increase the flap reach without jeopardizing its viability. It is also an easy to do technique and does not require any extra equipment or time.
