Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Radiol ; 8(6): 341-54, 1984.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6529903

ABSTRACT

This report examines 18 surgically proven L3/4 herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), all having myelogram, CT and adequate neurological evaluation. It will focus on four cases where the herniation involved the neural canal (intervertebral canal). Comparison to the 14 spinal canal central herniations will be made. The clinical findings for lateral L3/4 HNP allowed a preimaging diagnosis to be made in three of the four cases. In the central group the correct preimaging diagnosis was made one of the 14 cases (P less than 0.01). There are numerous reasons why the central L3/4 HNP preimaging diagnosis is inaccurate as well as difficult to establish and these reasons are discussed in detail. The myelographic and CT findings of the lateral L3/4 HNP are clearly elaborated. All herniations were extruded. They poorly responded to conservative management. The duration of illness, onset of pain to surgical disk removal, for the lateral herniations was 34.8 days and, 154.4 days for the central group (P less than 0.05). The myelogram is a disappointing test in the diagnosis of lateral L3/4 HNP, but highly accurate in spinal canal L3/4 HNP. CT is a preferred imaging test being virtually positive in all cases.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging , Myelography , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged
2.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 6(5): 874-87, 1982 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7142502

ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) is an accurate method of diagnosing herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in patients with back pain and radiculopathy. We evaluated 188 patients with 244 disk space explorations for the treatment of back pain and radiculopathy. In predicting HNP, CT was 92% accurate and myelography was 88% accurate. The only significant difference between the two modalities is at L5-S1. Here CT was 92% accurate in predicting HNP and myelography was 70% accurate, a difference that is statistically significant (p less than 0.01). The dural sac separation reduces the myelogram accuracy at L5-S1. In detailed evaluation of 188 patients with both CT-diagnosed and surgically confirmed HNPs, these HNPs were classified by location, calcification, size, and extrusion. If the maximum anteroposterior diameter of the HNP was less than one-half the anticipated normal sagittal diameter of the dural sac, the incidence of extrusion was less than 10%. If it occupied one-half or more of the anticipated normal sagittal diameter of the dural sac, the incidence of extrusion was greater than 90%. This difference is highly statistically significant (p less than 0.001). Thirty-five percent of the HNPs exhibited some degree of migration with the cephalic direction more common than the caudal direction. Computed tomography and myelography are both satisfactory methods of diagnosing HNP. The noninvasive CT gives direct anatomical information and is more accurate at L5-S1. If the physical examination correlates with the CT examination, then myelography may be bypassed and the patient treated with a high degree of confidence.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Myelography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...