Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different endocrown designs: Finite element study.

PURPOSE: Although endocrown is a successful restorative approach for endodontically treated molars, its survival rate in endodontically treated premolars with extensive loss of coronal structure has been debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with different lithium disilicate endocrown designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of an intact maxillary premolar, five models were designed. Model A: fiber post, core, and crown; Model B: endocrown, 5 mm pulpal extension and butt margin; Model C: endocrown, 5 mm pulpal extension and axial extension; Model D: Endocrown, 3 mm pulpal extension and butt margin; Model E: Endocrown, 3 mm pulpal extension and axial extension. The bone geometry was simplified as a cylinder of compact and trabecular bone. All models were imported into finite element analysis (FEA) software, where the base of the bone cylinder was chosen as fixed support. Axial and oblique loads of 100 N each were applied separately to each model, and static structural analysis was performed. RESULTS: Regardless of the design of the endocrown, the resulting von Mises stresses were far below the yield strength of the tooth structure and the flexural strength of the ceramic material. The generated von Mises stresses on the restoration decreased by 15% in the models with 3 mm pulp extension (D and E) compared to the 5-mm pulpal extension models. In addition, the resulting von Mises stresses on the tooth structure decreased also by 15% in models C and E with the axial extension compared to models B and D with the butt margin. CONCLUSION: Endocrown is a suitable restoration for endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Furthermore, reducing the depth of the pulpal extension to 3 mm with the addition of an axial extension resulted in a more favorable stress distribution within the tooth-restoration interface.

In vitro evaluation of marginal fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate laminate veneers at two thicknesses using different CAD/CAM systems / Avaliação in vitro do ajuste marginal de folheados laminados de silicato de lítio reforçados com zircônia em duas espessuras usando diferentes sistemas CAD / CAM

Objective: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of laminate veneers made of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate with two thicknesses using different CAD/CAM systems. Material and methods: 42 Laminate veneers milled from zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate were divided into three main groups according to milling machine used into: group X5, laminate veneers fabricated by inLab MCX5 milling machine; group CM, laminate veneers fabricated by Ceramill motion 2 milling machine; and group XL, laminate veneers fabricated by inLab MCXL milling machine. Each group was divided into two subgroups according to veneer thickness into: subgroup I, 0.5 mm thickness laminate veneers and subgroup II, 0.3 mm thickness laminate veneers. The marginal fit was measured using stereomicroscope. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Comparisons of main and simple effects were done utilizing Bonferroni correction. The significance level was set at (p ≤0.05) for all tests. Results: The mean( ± SD) highest marginal discrepancy was recorded in subgroup CMII at 85.45 ± 1.82 µm while the least mean marginal discrepancy was recorded in subgroup X5I (71.24 ± 2.64 µm). Conclusion: Both thicknesses(0.5 mm thickness and 0.3 mm thickness) and all tested CAD/CAM systems produced zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate laminate veneers with clinically acceptable marginal gaps; however, the closed CAD/CAM systems produced veneers with superior marginal fit than open systems at 0.3 mm thickness. The CAD/CAM system with the 5-axis milling machine produced the best marginal fit with 0.5 mm thickness. (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar a adaptação marginal de facetas laminadas de silicato de lítio reforçado com zircônia com duas espessuras, utilizando diferentes sistemas CAD / CAM. Material e métodos: 42 facetas laminadas fresadas a partir desilicato de lítio reforçado com zircônia foram divididos em três grupos principais de acordo com a fresadora usada em: grupo X5, facetas laminadas fabricados pela fresadora inLab MCX5; grupo CM, facetas laminadas fabricados por Ceramill motion 2; e grupo XL, facetas laminadas fabricados pelo inLab MCXL. Cada grupo foi dividido em dois subgrupos, de acordo com a espessura do laminado, em: subgrupo I, facetas laminadas com 0,5 mm de espessura e subgrupo II, facetas laminadas com espessura de 0,3 mm. A adaptação marginal foi medida usando estereomicroscópio. Os resultados foram tabulados e analisados estatisticamente usando o teste ANOVA de dois fatores seguido pelo teste post hoc de Tukey. Comparações dos efeitos principais e simples foram realizadas utilizando a correção de Bonferroni (P ≤ 0,05). Resultados: A maior discrepância marginal média ( ± DP) foi registrada no subgrupo CMII em 85,45 ± 1,82 µm, enquanto a menor discrepância marginal média foi registrada no subgrupo X5I 71,24 ± 2,64 µm. Conclusão: Ambas as espessuras (0,5 mm e 0,3 mm)e todos os sistemas CAD / CAM testados produziram facetas de laminado de silicato de lítio reforçadas com zircônia com lacunas clinicamente aceitáveis. No entanto, os sistemas CAD / CAM fechados produziam facetas com adaptação marginal superior aos sistemas abertos com 0,3 mm de espessura. O sistema CAD / CAM com a fresadora de 5 eixos produziu a melhor adaptação marginal com 0,5 mm de espessura (AU)

Comparing different bar materials for mandibular implant-supported overdenture: Finite-element analysis.

AIM: This study was conducted aiming to optimize the selection of bar material that can minimize stresses on mandibular bone. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One finite-element model was created under ANSYS environment to evaluate the use of different materials as a bar-manufacturing material in mandibular implant-supported overdenture (OD). Model components were created on engineering computer-aided design software and then assembled under the finite-element package. A force of 200 N was unilaterally and vertically applied on the left second premolar area. RESULTS: Within these study conditions, the polyether ether ketone bar produced the lowest Von Mises stress on OD and the maximum value of deformation. Stainless steel bar produced the maximum OD total deformation. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical and spongy bones are not sensitive to the bar material. Increasing bar material stiffness increases Von Mises stresses in the bar itself and reduces its total deformation, in what is called overconstrained system.

Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the fatigue resistance, fracture resistance and mode of failure of posterior hybrid-abutment-crown vs. hybrid-abutment with separate crown, both bonded to short titanium bases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two titanium implants were embedded perpendicularly in auto-polymerizing resin. Implant-supported restorations simulating a maxillary first premolar were designed and milled using a CAD/CAM system and divided into 2 groups according to material (n = 16): zirconia (Z) and lithium disilicate (L). Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to design (n = 8): hybrid-abutment-crown (ZS, LS) and hybrid-abutment with separate crown (ZC, LC). Each group was subjected to 1.2 million cycles of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading in a dual-axis chewing simulator at 120 N load. Surviving specimens were subjected to quasi-static loading in a universal testing machine. Mode of failure was determined under a low magnification optical microscope. RESULTS: During chewing simulation, 18.8% of zirconia and 43.8% of lithium disilicate restorations failed. The fracture resistance median values ranged from 3,730 N for group ZC, 3,400 N for group ZS, 1,295 N for group LS to 849 N for group LC. Group ZC had a statistically significant higher fracture resistance than groups LC and LS; however, it did not differ significantly from group ZS (p ≤ 0.05). Failures were seen in both titanium bases and ceramic superstructure. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia and lithium disilicate hybrid implant-supported restorations with short (3 mm) titanium bases failed in a considerable number already during chewing simulation. Therefore, despite their high fracture strength the use in the posterior region should be considered critically.