Differences in Clinicopathological Features, P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 Immunohistochemical Expressions, and Survival Between Colorectal Carcinoma in Rectosigmoid and Other Colonic Locations.

Background One unique criterion of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the different locations within the colorectum. Different CRC sidedness/locations could have distinct criteria, including risk factors, morphological features, genetic alterations, prognostic factors, and clinical outcomes. Nearly half of the CRC cases occur in the rectal-sigmoid locations, while other colonic locations constitute the other half. Investigating specific protein expression patterns in the rectosigmoid CRC (rsCRC) compared to other colonic (ocCRC) locations helps understand the disease pathogenesis, predict prognosis, and design personalized treatments. This study is the first to compare P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression in rsCRC to ocCRC and examine their relationship to disease outcomes in both locations. Materials and methods A comparative cross-sectional study used tissue microarray slides from rsCRC and ocCRC that were immunohistochemically stained by anti-P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 antibodies. A semi-quantitative scoring system classified each marker's expression as positive or negative. The statistical analysis compared clinicopathological features, P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 expressions, and their relationship to clinical outcomes in rsCRC and ocCRC cases. Results One hundred fifty CRCs were distributed into the rsCRC cases (n=86, 57.3%) and the ocCRC cases (n=64, 42.7%). The rsCRC cases had a significantly lower age <40 years (P=0.002), higher frequency of mismatch repair (MMR) proficient status (P=0.003), and perineural invasion (P=0.008), with lower disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.03, and P=0.015, respectively). Significantly higher positive P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 IHC expressions were found in the rsCRCs compared to the ocCRCs (P=0.02, and P=0.03, respectively); however, their relationship to the hazards (HR) of recurrence (HR=4.02, P=0.058, and HR=0.36, P=0.14, respectively) and mortality (HR=2.56, P=0.21, and HR=0.23, P=0.58, respectively) in the rsCRC group was statistically nonsignificant. In the ocCRC group, P16Ink4a positivity was significantly associated with a higher disease recurrence and mortality hazard (HR=8.19, P=0.007, and HR=5.57, P=0.037, respectively), while P57KIP2 positivity was significantly associated with a lower mortality hazard (HR=0.12, P=0.027). Conclusion The rsCRCs differ from ocCRCs in clinicopathological criteria and protein expression patterns. Though P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 IHC expressions are higher in the rsCRC than in the ocCRC, their value as outcome predictors is higher in the ocCRCs rather than the rsCRCs. P16Ink4a and P57KIP2 can act as prognostic markers and be suitable targets for therapy modulation in the ocCRC group.

Cytoplasmic PPARγ Significantly Correlates With P53 Immunohistochemical Expression and Tumor Size in Localized Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a monoarticular fibrohistiocytic benign or locally aggressive soft tissue tumor that originates from the synovium of joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths. It has an inflammatory neoplastic nature, with a clinical presentation ranging from pain, swelling, stiffness, and limited range of movement to joint instability and blockage. Its uncommon incidence leads to a poorly understood pathogenesis. Localized forms of TGCT (LTGCT) can cause significant morbidity, interfere with daily patient activities, and decrease the patient's quality of life in challenging cases. This study aimed to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma) and P53 in LTGCT to understand the disease better and offer potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: The study is cross-sectional, in which 27 LTGCT cases were collected from the Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. Solitary and multiple LTGCT cases retrieved between January 2018 and December 2022 were included, and immunohistochemically stained with anti-PPARγ and P53 antibodies. The TGCT samples were excluded if they were insufficient for sectioning, processing, and interpretation, over-fixed, had process artifacts, or were of the diffuse TGCT type. Scoring of stain expression was performed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) analysis using the threshold method and was expressed in percent area/high power field. Clinicopathological correlations were analyzed. RESULTS: All the 27 collected LTGCT cases were located in the small joints of patients' hands. Cases with solitary LGTCTs constituted 55.6% (n = 15), while 44.4% (n = 12) had multiple LTGCTs related to one affected site/case (e.g., multiple tumors in one finger). PPARγ was expressed in the cytoplasm of mononuclear and multinucleated tumor cells and foamy histiocytes, while P53 expression was mainly in mononuclear cells' nuclei. PPARγ significantly correlated with P53 expression (r = 0.9 and P = 0.000). PPARγ (r = 0.4 and P = 0.02) and P53 (r = 0.5 and P = 0.01) were positively correlated with tumor size. Only P53 expression was positively correlated with tumor multiplicity (r = 0.4 and P = 0.03). Using the receiver operating characteristic curve test, the P53 cutoff score detecting the multiplicity of TGCTs was ≥20.5%, with a 75% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CONCLUSION: PPARγ and P53 have a significant role in LTGCT growth, while P53 plays a role in tumor multiplicity. They can be possible targets in LTGCTs unfit for excision.

Detection of AZFc gene deletion in a cohort of Egyptian patients with idiopathic male infertility.

BACKGROUND: The deletions of azoospermic factor regions (AZF) are considered risk factor of spermatogenic failure. AZF duplications or complex copy number variants (CNVs) were rarely studied because STS-PCR could not always detect these changes. The application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a valuable test for detection of the deletion and or duplication was introduced to investigate the AZF sub-region CNVs. The MLPA technique is still not applied on a large scale, and the publications in this area of research are limited. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of MLPA assay to detect AZF-linked CNVs in idiopathic spermatogenic failure patients and to evaluate its importance as a prognostic marker in the reproduction outcome. RESULTS: Forty infertile men (37 with azoospermia and 3 with severe oligozoospermia) and 20 normal fertile men were subjected to thorough clinical, pathological, and laboratory assessment, chromosomal study, MLPA, STS-PCR assays, histopathology study, and testicular sperm retrieval (TESE). Out of the 40 patients, 7 patients have shown CNV in the AZFc region, 6 patients have partial deletion, and one patient has partial duplication. Only one of the normal control has AZFc duplication. STS-PCR was able to detect the deletion in only 4 out of the 7 positive patients and none of the control. CONCLUSION: We concluded that MLPA should be applied on a larger scale for the detection of Y chromosome microdeletion as a rapid, efficient, and cheap test.