Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genes (Basel) ; 15(7)2024 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39062725

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: An investigation for the co-occurrence of two unrelated genetic disorders of muscular dystrophy and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) (OMIM#176270) using joint whole genome sequencing (WGS). METHODS: Trio WGS joint analysis was performed to investigate the genetic etiology in a proband with PWS, prolonged muscular hypotonia associated hyperCKemia, and early-onset obesity. The parents were unaffected. RESULTS: Results showed maternal isodisomy uniparental disomy (UPD) in chromosome 15, expanding from 15q11.2 to 15q22.2, including PWS regions at 15q11.2-15q13. Maternal heterodisomy was detected from 15q22.2 to 15q26.3. A pathogenic variant, NM_000070.3(CAPN3):c.550del (p.Thr184fs), was identified at 15q15.1 in a heterozygous state in the mother that was homozygous in the proband due to maternal isodisomy. CONCLUSION: This is the first study of the concurrent molecular etiology of PWS and calpainopathy (OMIM#253600) in the same patient. This report highlights the utility of joint analysis and the need for the assessment of autosomal recessive disease in regions of isodisomy in patients with complex and unexplained phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Calpain , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15 , Prader-Willi Syndrome , Uniparental Disomy , Female , Humans , Male , Calpain/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15/genetics , Muscle Proteins , Prader-Willi Syndrome/genetics , Prader-Willi Syndrome/diagnosis , Prader-Willi Syndrome/pathology , Uniparental Disomy/genetics , Whole Genome Sequencing
2.
Front Oncol ; 12: 942741, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36091175

ABSTRACT

Genomic profiles of tumors are often unique and represent characteristic mutational signatures defined by DNA damage or DNA repair response processes. The tumor-derived somatic information has been widely used in therapeutic applications, but it is grossly underutilized in the assessment of germline genetic variants. Here, we present a comprehensive approach for evaluating the pathogenicity of germline variants in cancer using an integrated interpretation of somatic and germline genomic data. We have previously demonstrated the utility of this integrated approach in the reassessment of pathogenic germline variants in selected cancer patients with unexpected or non-syndromic phenotypes. The application of this approach is presented in the assessment of rare variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in Lynch-related colon cancer, hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Using this integrated method, germline VUS in PMS2, MSH6, SDHC, SHDA, and TP53 were assessed in 16 cancer patients after genetic evaluation. Comprehensive clinical criteria, somatic signature profiles, and tumor immunohistochemistry were used to re-classify VUS by upgrading or downgrading the variants to likely or unlikely actionable categories, respectively. Going forward, collation of such germline variants and creation of cross-institutional knowledgebase datasets that include integrated somatic and germline data will be crucial for the assessment of these variants in a larger cancer cohort.

3.
MethodsX ; 9: 101761, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35774415

ABSTRACT

The interpretation of hereditary genetic sequencing variants is often limited due to the absence of functional data and other key evidence to assess the role of variants in disease. Cancer genetics is unique, as two sets of genomic information are often available from a cancer patient: somatic and germline. Despite the progress made in the integrated analysis of somatic and germline findings, the assessment of pathogenicity of germline variants in high penetrance genes remains grossly underutilized. Indeed, standard ACMG/AMP guidelines for interpreting germline sequence variants do not address the evidence derived from tumor data in cancer. Previously, we have demonstrated the utility of somatic tumor data as supporting evidence to elucidate the role of germline variants in patients suspected with VHL syndrome and other cancers. We have leveraged the key elements of cancer genetics in these cases: genes with expected high disease penetrance and those with a known biallelic mechanism of tumorigenicity. Here we provide our optimized protocol for evaluating the pathogenicity of germline VHL variants using informative somatic profiling data. This protocol provides details of case selection, assessment of personal and family evidence, somatic tumor profiles, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) as supporting evidence for the re-evaluation of germline variants.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL