ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Conventional bedside teaching (CBT) is an integral and classical method for imparting clinical skills to undergraduates in medical schools. It is a traditionally successful approach, especially when it comes to imparting patient-doctor relationship skills and knowledge on clinical management. Peyton's four-step approach (PFSA) is one of the newer structured instructional approaches for teaching-learning, especially for imparting procedural and complex psychomotor skills. The present study compares the application of PFSA in teaching complex systemic examination skills to the CBT technique in teaching the same skill to MBBS students. The impact of the acquisition of this examination skill was assessed statistically to compare PFSA and CBT methodologies. METHODOLOGY: The target population was MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) students; for this study, the phase II MBBS students were considered as the study population since they were relatively naïve to clinical bedside examination skills. Students were allotted groups and they were taught clinical skills through CBT and PFSA separately. Using the OpenEpi toolkit Version 3 open-source sample size calculator for comparing two means, the sample size was 30 students in each group. The students were assessed for their competency and were also made to fill out a feedback questionnaire to compare the two methods of education dispensing. Results: The results of this study showed that PFSA is definitely suitable for teaching clinical examination skills. The acquisition of skills was found non-inferior to CBT while the retention of these skills was found to be equally good or even superior with PFSA than with CBT. Conclusion: PFSA has already been proven to be a good teaching method for the acquisition of complex procedural skills. This study expands the role of PFSA in teaching clinical bedside examination skills to medical students. Further large-scale studies may clarify the learning impact and outcomes of PFSA in clinical bedside teaching.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Ropivacaine, s-enantiomer of amide local anaesthetic produces differential neural blockade with less motor blockade, cardiovascular and neurological toxicity makes it suitable for day case surgery in children. AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of Inj. Ropivacaine (0.2 or 0.25%) or Inj. Bupivacaine (0.25%) with fentanyl in caudal block for intra and postoperative analgesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Double blind retrospective randomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the patients (n=112) varying from age group 3.02 ± 3.29 years belonging to ASA I-IV were randomly allocated to receive caudal analgesia Group BF inj. Bupivacaine (0.25%, 2 mg/kg) + Inj. Fentany1 µg/kg (n=70) and group RF: Inj. Ropivacaine (0.25% or 0.2%, 2 mg/kg) + inj. Fentanyl 1 µg/kg (n=42). We monitored vitals and requirement of inhalational gases inraoperatively and also observed pain by pain score (Visual Analogue Score in verbal group and Objective Pain Scale in nonverbal group) and vitals postoperatively. We used rescue analgesics (inj. Paracetamol 5 mg/kg iv) when VAS score ≥4. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test. RESULTS: Duration of analgesia was prolonged in both group RF and BF. Time for first rescue analgesic for group RF (6.1 ± 1.1 hr) compared to group BF (5.6 ± 0.9 hr). Haemodynamic stability and less requirement of inhalation agent intraoperatively with group RF than others. CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine with Fentanyl found to be better combination for pediatric surgeries for below umbilical surgeries as an adjuvant to general anaesthesia or sole technique with chances of less complication with high success rate.
