Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 1081, 2022 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266623

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HER2 expression has a prognostic and predictive impact in early-stage breast cancer (BC). HER2 positive BC (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 3 + or 2 + with in situ hybridization (ISH) amplification) are treated with HER2 targeted therapies. The concept of HER2-low BC (IHC score 1 + or 2 + without ISH amplification) is drawing attention as anti-HER2 treatment has recently shown efficacy in this subgroup. We aimed to explore the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low early BC according to the HER2 score (1 + or 2 + without amplification). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in two French comprehensive cancer centers. All patients with HER2-low BC treated with NAC from January 2014 to December 2020 were included. The primary objective was to analyze the pathological complete response (pCR) rate to NAC using the Sataloff or RCB system, according to the HER2 score. Secondary objectives were to assess disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and to explore the immune environment through the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), according to HER2 expression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included 237 tumors for 229 patients. Of these, 160 (67.5%) tumors were HER2 1 + , 77 (32.5%) were HER2 2 + , and 152 (64.1%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive. The median age was 53.9 years. No differences in tumor characteristics were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups. pCR was achieved in 38 tumors (17%), without any difference between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups (p = 0.77). DFS and OS were significantly different between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + patients (HR = 0.41,CI95%[0.17;0.97] p = 0.037 and HR = 0.31,CI95%[0.09;1.02] p = 0.042, respectively). HER2 status was still associated with DFS and OS after adjustment for age, HR status and NLR, with better outcomes in favor of HER2 score 2 + (HR = 0.35 [0.15-0.84] and HR = 0.24 [0.07-0.81], respectively). NLR was not associated with worse DFS or OS. CONCLUSION: In HER2-low early BC, no differences in pCR were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + tumors, however patients with HER2 2 + tumors had a better DFS and OS than those with HER2 1 + . Further investigations are needed to describe the intrinsic differences in the spectrum of HER2-low BC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Disease-Free Survival , Hormones/therapeutic use
2.
Ann Pathol ; 41(6): 507-520, 2021 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34393014

ABSTRACT

The last international guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have been updated in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists, on the basis of a twenty-year practice and results of numerous clinical trials. Moreover, the emerging HER2-low concept for 1+ and 2+ non amplified breast cancers lead to refine French practices for HER2 status assessment. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists, herein presents the latest French recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in breast cancer, taking into account the ASCO/CAP guidelines and introducing the HER2-low concept. In the era of personalized medicine, HER2 status assessment remains one of the most important biomarkers in breast cancer and its quality guaranties the optimal patients' care. French pathologists' commitment in theranostic biomarker quality is more than ever required to provide the most efficient cares in oncology.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
3.
Bull Cancer ; 105(4): 431-439, 2018 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29567279

ABSTRACT

Primary neuroendocrine breast carcinomas are rare and little-known tumors. Only a limited number of studies on neuroendocrine breast carcinomas have been reported in the literature, and the vast majority of them are small retrospective series or case reports. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), they account for only 2 % to 5 % of breast cancers. Their diagnosis relies on the presence of a neuroendocrine architecture and the expression of neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin). The revised 2012 WHO classification subdivides them into three categories: (i) well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, (ii) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas or small-cell carcinomas, and (iii) invasive breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation. Their clinical features and radiological characteristics are not different from those of other types of breast cancer. Because of discordant results, their clinical outcome is still poorly defined. So far, no standard treatment has been established, and most clinicians draw on their experience of invasive ductal cancer. The role of specific treatments like platinum-based chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionucleide therapy or temozolomide remains unclear. A better knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in their carcinogenesis could help to identify new potential therapeutic targets. The efficacy of targeted therapies has to be studied.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Rare Diseases , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chromogranin A/metabolism , Female , Humans , Incidence , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/epidemiology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/metabolism , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Rare Diseases/diagnosis , Rare Diseases/epidemiology , Rare Diseases/metabolism , Rare Diseases/pathology , Synaptophysin/metabolism
4.
Muscle Nerve ; 43(4): 543-51, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21305567

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) hold promise for cell therapy because they may promote regeneration of the central nervous system. However, OECs have been less studied after peripheral nerve injury (PNI). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of OEC transplantation on a severe sciatic nerve (SN) lesion. METHODS: OECs were injected in rats after section and 2-cm resection of the SN. RESULTS: Three months after therapy, muscle strength and morphometric studies showed complete restoration of the contractile properties of the gastrocnemius and complete repair of the SN. Immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR studies indicated an increase in the presence of neurotrophic factors. Interestingly, tracking of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive OECs showed that no OECs were present in the SN. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that, after severe PNI, OECs have remarkable potential for nerve regeneration by creating a favorable microenvironment.


Subject(s)
Axons/physiology , Nerve Regeneration/physiology , Olfactory Bulb/transplantation , Recovery of Function/physiology , Sciatic Neuropathy/surgery , Animals , Cell Transplantation/methods , Cells, Cultured , Male , Muscle Strength/physiology , Olfactory Bulb/cytology , Olfactory Bulb/physiology , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Sciatic Neuropathy/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...