Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 7(2): 121-31, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16605292

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although several controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and good tolerability of 1% pimecrolimus cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the results of these trials may not apply to real-life usage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a pimecrolimus-based regimen in daily practice. METHODS: This was a 6-month, open-label, multicenter study in 947 patients aged >or=3 months with atopic dermatitis of all severities. The investigators incorporated 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients' standard treatment protocols on the basis of their clinical diagnosis. Use of topical corticosteroids was allowed at the discretion of the physician. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by monitoring adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated by recording changes in the Investigators' Global Assessment scores and pruritus scores at each visit. RESULTS: No clinically unexpected adverse events were reported. The discontinuation rate for adverse events was 2.3%. The disease improvement rate was 53.7% at week 1 and 66.9% at week 24. The pimecrolimus-based regimen was particularly effective for the treatment of lesions involving the face (improvement rate: 61.9% at week 1 and 76.7% at week 24). The greatest therapeutic response was experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. Nonetheless, 64% and 65% of infants and children, respectively, with severe/very severe facial disease at baseline were clear/almost clear of signs of atopic dermatitis on their face at week 24. In patients aged <18 years, most of the improvement occurred within the first week of treatment, while in adults a progressive improvement was observed over the entire study period. Worsening of disease by the end of the study occurred in 9.5% of patients and was most frequent in adults (12.6%). The discontinuation rate for unsatisfactory therapeutic effect was 4.8%. The mean number of treatment days was 135.6 (SD 53.2). The mean drug consumption (non-US centers only) was 4.2 g per treatment day. Drug consumption decreased over time as disease improved. In total, 47% of patients who completed the study never used topical corticosteroids over 6 months. CONCLUSION: In daily practice, incorporation of 1% pimecrolimus cream into patients' standard treatment regimen is well tolerated and improves atopic dermatitis in approximately two-thirds of patients. Disease improvement is particularly evident on the face. The greatest therapeutic response is experienced by pediatric patients with mild or moderate disease. In these patients, most of the improvement is observed within 1 week from the start of treatment.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Tacrolimus/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/adverse effects
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 53(4): 602-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16198779

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare pharmacokinetics of pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.1% in adults with extensive, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Secondary end points included efficacy and safety. METHODS: Patients received twice-daily treatment for 13 days. Blood concentrations of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus were measured at days 1, 5, and 13. Treatment success was defined as an Investigators' Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). RESULTS: Tacrolimus was detectable in 36% of blood samples and pimecrolimus was detectable in 12%. In patients with measurable blood drug concentrations, systemic exposure to tacrolimus (mean area under the curve(0-10h) < 9.7 ng.h/mL; n = 7) was higher than to pimecrolimus (mean area under the curve(0-10h) < 2.5 ng.h/mL; n = 2). Whole-body treatment success (day 13) was achieved in 1 of 18 (5.6%) and 2 of 19 (10.5%) patients treated with pimecrolimus and tacrolimus, respectively, and face/neck treatment success in 5 of 18 (27.8%) and 5 of 19 (26.3%) patients, respectively. Patients included in the study were adult patients with severe atopic dermatitis. The results and conclusions drawn from this study population may not be applicable for the majority of patients with atopic dermatitis who have mild to moderate disease. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus appears to be associated with lower systemic drug exposure than tacrolimus.


Subject(s)
Calcineurin Inhibitors , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Tacrolimus/analogs & derivatives , Tacrolimus/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Area Under Curve , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/blood , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/blood
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 51(4): 515-25, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15389185

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: 141 patients (aged 2-17 years) were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% (n=71) or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (n=70) twice daily for 6 weeks. RESULTS: At day 4, local, application-site reactions were less common and of shorter duration with pimecrolimus than with tacrolimus. Incidence of erythema/irritation was 8% (6/71) with pimecrolimus compared with 19% (13/70) with tacrolimus (P=.039). Fewer patients receiving pimecrolimus (0%, 0/6) experienced erythema/irritation lasting >30 minutes, compared with those receiving tacrolimus (85%, 11/13; P <.001). Fewer patients reported itching with pimecrolimus (8%; 6/71) than with tacrolimus (20%; 14/70; P=.073). Incidence of warmth, stinging, and burning was similar in both groups; however, reactions lasting >30 minutes were fewer with pimecrolimus (0%, 0/14) than with tacrolimus (67%, 8/12; P <.001). More patients receiving pimecrolimus rated ease of application as 'excellent' or 'very good', compared with tacrolimus (76% vs 59%, respectively; P <.020). Efficacy was similar in both groups at day 43. Both treatments were generally well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% had better formulation attributes and local tolerability than tacrolimus ointment 0.03% while providing similar efficacy and overall safety in pediatric patients with moderate AD.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Tacrolimus/analogs & derivatives , Tacrolimus/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Erythema/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Ointments , Patient Satisfaction , Pruritus/chemically induced , Tacrolimus/adverse effects
4.
Int J Dermatol ; 41(6): 357-9, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12100692

ABSTRACT

We describe an 8-year-old Hispanic female who presented with distal subungual onychomycosis and tinea capitis. Both foci of infection yielded Trichophyton tonsurans upon culture, and were clinically and mycologically cured with terbinafine 125 mg, once daily for 1 week [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED]. This aspect of treatment with terbinafine has not previously been reported.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Naphthalenes/therapeutic use , Onychomycosis/drug therapy , Onychomycosis/microbiology , Tinea Capitis/drug therapy , Tinea Capitis/microbiology , Trichophyton/drug effects , Trichophyton/isolation & purification , Child , Female , Hand Dermatoses/drug therapy , Hand Dermatoses/microbiology , Humans , Terbinafine , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...