ABSTRACT
Anaerobic power is characterized by a high degree of specificity regarding both the recruited muscles as well as the recruitment pattern. The popular Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a cycling test that does not satisfy the need for a running-specific anaerobic test. We describe such a test, using a novel type of a commercially available treadmill (BRL 1800, Gymrol, France). The ergometer is equipped with a torque motor to neutralize the frictional resistance of the treadmill belt, and a hip-belt harness connected to a horizontal rod. Force applied to the harness is monitored by a strain gauge mounted on the rod, while vertical movement is monitored by a potentiometer at the posterior fixed end of the rod. These, in conjunction with the treadmill belt speed, enable the computation of horizontal and vertical power as well as the combined total output. Power is calculated both as 'peak' power (highest 2.5 s segment) and 'mean' power (20 s duration). Preliminary results of young athletes were generally consistent with the expected age-related changes in anaerobic power. Values obtained on the anaerobic treadmill were always higher than the corresponding WAnT values previously obtained in comparable age groups. The higher values were probably due to the larger muscle mass involved and the shorter peak and mean power durations (2.5 and 20 s versus 5 and 30 s in the WAnT, respectively). This test should enable not only running-specific anaerobic power monitoring but also the characterization of the relationship between the horizontal and vertical components of that power.
Subject(s)
Anaerobic Threshold , Exercise Test/instrumentation , Exercise Test/standards , Running/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic , Recruitment, Neurophysiological , Reproducibility of Results , Software ValidationABSTRACT
Five patients with optic nerve gliomas were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Images obtained with MRI were equal to computed tomography (CT) in evaluation of the orbital components of these tumors and superior to CT in evaluating the intracanalicular, chiasmal, and post-chiasmal extension of tumor. MRI is unimpeded by artifacts produced by surrounding bone, as encountered in CT, and also proves to be more sensitive in delineating subtle differences in fat content and hydration of neural tissues. Thus, MRI is extremely valuable in furthering our understanding of the natural and therapeutic response of optic nerve gliomas.
