ABSTRACT
Despite the prominence of complex psychosocial problems in aging clients, geriatric case management has generally emphasized the provision of concrete resources and services as its primary function. However, some of the literature as well as the findings of this study, point to competent case management as being contingent on interventions that successfully address key psychosocial problems. This paper presents a qualitative study involving experienced geriatric care managers. Psychosocial problem and intervention categories are identified as well as overarching themes with significant implications for practice. The paper argues that a grounded, thorough, well-explicated and generalizable model for clinically-focused geriatric case management practice is necessary; it also suggests additional research towards the development of such a model.
Subject(s)
Case Management , Geriatric Psychiatry/methods , Social Work, Psychiatric/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Models, Organizational , Organizational Innovation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient-Centered Care , Problem Solving , Professional-Family RelationsABSTRACT
This article builds on prior analyses of data collected from a qualitative study of 50 pairs of social worker-physician collaborators in. This article presents the elements of a typology of collaborators from both professions developed from those analyses. The typology was also applied to the entire sample and each respondent characterized according to type (traditional, transitional or transformational). Further analysis was done to evaluate the relationships between type and collaborative perspectives. The sample was primarily transitional (56%-58%) and there were more traditional social workers (22%) and transformational doctors (24%) than anticipated. Social workers, as a group, were much less satisfied with the doctors than the doctors were with them although both groups of traditional respondents were the most dissatisfied. Both groups were least transformational in relation to control over decision making.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Interprofessional Relations , Physicians/psychology , Professional Role/psychology , Social Work/classification , Decision Making, Organizational , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , New York , Patient Care Team , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In past reviews of the literature on psychosocial interventions for cancer patients, different reviewers have reached disparate conclusions about the ability of a psychosocial intervention to have an impact on cancer survival. This article highlights some of the basis for differences of opinion, including the range of psychosocial interventions provided to patients and the challenges inherent in conducting research studies of this type. Social workers who work with cancer patients at vulnerable times need to understand what the current evidence shows can be gained from participation in a psychosocial intervention. Several key questions have been identified that can provide the basis for future rigorous studies. The role of the social worker in participating and shaping research on the relationship of psychosocial intervention and cancer survival is also discussed.
