Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Confl Health ; 17(1): 47, 2023 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Access to basic health services, notably child health services, is severely hampered by the armed conflict in Tigray, North Ethiopia. Little is known regarding the impacts of the armed conflict during the war in Tigray on access to child health services. The current study investigates the impact of the armed conflict on the utilization of child health services in Tigray. METHODS: 4,381 caregivers from randomly recruited households (HHs) with at least one child younger than 1 year old participated in a community-based cross-sectional survey. We collected data on childhood immunizations and illness-related treatment seeking from August 4 to 20, 2021. We describe data using frequency and percentage and carry out an internal comparison among the study participants using chi-square tests. RESULTS: 4,381 children under the age of one included in the study. In total, 39% of infants received no basic vaccines, 61.3% of the children under the age of one received at least one vaccine, and 20% received all the vaccinations recommended for their age. About 61% of children were affected by at least one childhood ailments where majority of them were from rural areas. Mothers who did not seek postnatal care (PNC) were responsible for more than 75% of reported childhood illnesses. CONCLUSIONS: A sizable portion of children were unvaccinated and had at least one childhood sickness while the war was in progress. Particularly, people who live in rural areas reported a higher percentage of children's illnesses but a lower use of child health services. To lower childhood morbidity and mortality in the besieged area, such as Tigray, local to global actors need to get coordinated and warrying parties should stop weaponization of vaccination healthcare services.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0281952, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36848332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia-eclampsia syndrome remains the leading cause of maternal and neonatal mortality worldwide. Both from pathophysiologic and clinical stand points, early and late onset preeclampsia are thought to be two different disease entities. However, the magnitude of preeclampsia-eclampsia and maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes of early and late onset preeclampsia are not adequately investigated in resource-limited settings. This study sought to examine the clinical presentation and maternal-fetal and neonatal outcome of these two entities of the disease in Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital, an academic setting in Tigray, Ethiopia, from January 1, 2015-December 31, 2021. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design was employed. The patient charts were reviewed to see the baseline characteristics and their progress from the onset of the disease in the antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum periods. Women who developed pre-eclampsia before 34 weeks of gestation were defined as having early-onset pre-eclampsia, and those who developed at 34 weeks or later were identified as late-onset preeclampsia. We used chi-square, t-test and multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine differences between early- and late onset diseases in terms of clinical presentation, maternal-fetal, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 27,350 mothers who gave birth at the Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital, 1095 mothers had preeclampsia-eclampsia syndrome, with a prevalence of 4.0% (95% CI: 3.8, 4.2)]. Of the 934 mothers analyzed early and late onset diseases accounted for 253 (27.1%) and 681 (72.9%) respectively. Overall, death of 25 mothers was recorded. Women with early onset disease had significant unfavorable maternal outcomes including having preeclampsia with severity features (AOR = 2.92, 95% CI: 1.92, 4.45), liver dysfunction (AOR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.95), uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure (AOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.03, 2.84), and prolonged hospitalization (AOR = 4.70, 95% CI: 2.15, 10.28). Similarly, they also had increased unfavorable perinatal outcomes, including the APGAR score at the 5th minute (AOR = 13.79, 95% CI: 1.16, 163.78), low birth weight (AOR = 10.14, 95% CI 4.29, 23.91), and neonatal death (AOR = 6.82, 95% CI: 1.89, 24.58). CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the clinical differences between early versus late onset preeclampsia. Women with early-onset disease are at increased levels of unfavorable maternal outcomes. Perinatal morbidity and mortality were also increased significantly in women with early onset disease. Therefore, gestational age at the onset of the disease should be taken as an important indicator of the severity of the disease with unfavorable maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Eclampsia , Pre-Eclampsia , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Eclampsia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Late Onset Disorders , Hospitals, Teaching , Mothers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...