Systematic review of spinal anaesthesia using bupivacaine for ambulatory knee arthroscopy.

The use of lidocaine in spinal anaesthesia is associated with transient neurological syndrome (TNS). Bupivacaine has a lower incidence of TNS as an alternative but it may have a prolonged action. This study systematically reviews the literature about the recovery profile of patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia, using bupivacaine for arthroscopic knee surgery. We identified 17 eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (1268 patients). All the articles in this review, except one, used hyperbaric bupivacaine. Five trials compared different doses of bupivacaine (range 3-15 mg). Large doses of bupivacaine (10 and 15 mg) were associated with delayed recovery, and supine positioning was associated with a high incidence of failure. With unilateral positioning, a dose as low as 4-5 mg seems to be sufficient. Five trials comparing bupivacaine or levobupivacaine with ropivacaine showed no significant difference in the time to home discharge. When bupivacaine was combined with fentanyl in two trials, marginal delay in recovery was found [time to discharge (min); weighted mean difference (WMD) 14.1, 95% CI 11.9-40.1] and increased nausea and pruritus but had reduced postoperative pain. Unilateral and bilateral spinal anaesthesia were assessed in two trials, and the latter group was associated with early recovery and discharge [time to discharge (min); WMD -41.6, 95% CI -63.6 to -19.6). The results of our systematic review suggest that 4-5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine can effectively produce spinal anaesthesia for knee arthroscopy with unilateral positioning. Ropivacaine or the addition of adjuvants did not improve the recovery time. There is a need for tighter RCTs with more consistent endpoints.

Percutaneous needle aspiration, injection, and reaspiration with or without benzimidazole coverage for uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cysts.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic hydatid cyst is an important public health problem in parts of the world where dogs are used for cattle breeding. Management of uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cysts is currently surgical. However, the puncture, aspiration, injection, and re-aspiration (PAIR) method with or without benzimidazole coverage has appeared as an alternative to surgery over the past decade. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of PAIR with or without benzimidazole coverage for patients with uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cyst in comparison with sham/no intervention, surgery, or medical treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, and ACP Journal Club and full text searches were combined (all searched October 2004). Reference lists of pertinent studies and other identified literature were scanned. Researchers in the field were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised clinical trials using the PAIR method with or without benzimidazole coverage as the experimental treatment of uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cyst (ie, hepatic hydatid cysts which are not infected and do not have any communication with the biliary tree or other viscera) versus no intervention, sham puncture (ie, performing all steps for puncture, pretending that PAIR is being performed, but actually not performing the procedure proper), surgery, or chemotherapy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted and methodological quality of each trial was assessed by the authors. Principal authors of the trials were contacted to retrieve missing data. MAIN RESULTS: We found no randomised clinical trials comparing PAIR versus no or sham intervention. We identified only two randomised clinical trials, one comparing PAIR versus surgical treatment (n = 50) and the other comparing PAIR (with or without albendazole) versus albendazole alone (n = 30). Both trials were graded as 'adequate' for allocation concealment; however, generation of allocation sequence and blinding methods were 'unclear' in both of them. Compared to surgery, PAIR plus albendazole obtain similar cyst disappearance and mean cyst diameter with fewer adverse events (32% versus 84%, P < 0.001) and fewer days in hospital (mean + SD) ( 4.2 + 1.5 versus 12.7 + 6.5 days, P < 0.001). Compared to albendazole, PAIR with or without albendazole obtain significantly more often (P < 0.01) cyst reduction and symptomatic relief. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PAIR seems promising, but there is insufficient evidence to support or refute PAIR with or without benzimidazole coverage for treating patients with uncomplicated hepatic hydatid cyst. Further well-designed randomised clinical trials are necessary to address the topic.