Comparing the effects of pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin on postoperative pain after tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trail.

Background: Postoperative pain (POP) is one of the most common and most important types of pain. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin on postoperative pain (POP) among patients with tibia fracture surgery. Materials and Methods: This double-blind three-group randomised controlled trial was conducted in 2023. Participants were 111 candidates for tibia fracture surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly allocated to oxycodone, gabapentin, and diclofenac groups through block randomisation. Baseline arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure were documented before surgery and POP and sedation status were measured during postoperative recovery and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Postoperative opioid analgesic use was also documented. The data were analysed using the SPSS software (v. 20.0) at a significance level of less than 0.05. Results: Groups did not significantly differ from each other respecting participants' baseline age, gender, body mass index, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and surgery duration (P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences among the groups respecting POP and sedation status at different measurement time points (P > 0.05), except for six hours after surgery at which the POP mean score in the gabapentin group was significantly less than the other two groups (P = 0.001). Among-group differences respecting postoperative use of opioid analgesics and medication side effects were also insignificant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin significantly reduce POP among patients with tibia fracture surgery, though gabapentin may produce more significant analgesic effects. All these three medications can be used for pre-emptive analgesia. Of course, the best pre-emptive analgesic agent is determined based on the opinion of the treating physician.

Long-term outcomes of converting fused hips to total hip arthroplasty are satisfactory: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Although conversion arthroplasty of fused hips can relieve pain and provide patient satisfaction, long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip fusion remain a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of THA for fused hips over a long period with concerns over potential complications. Methods: A systematic search of five databases from 2000 until 2023 identified English studies evaluating THA for fused hips with at least 100 months of follow-up. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effect models via the comprehensive meta-analysis software. Sensitivity analysis, in-depth meta-regression, Egger's test, and the trim-and-fill method were performed appropriately. Results: The meta-analysis assessed 790 patients and 889 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 years. At the final follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) improved by 34.755 and 2.3 cm from the baseline, respectively. Regarding survival of hip fusion conversion to THA, most studies (88.8%) reported a 5-year implant survival rate of at least 90%, and the 15-year and 20-year implant survival rates, ranged between 80-90% and 70-90%, respectively. Subjective dissatisfaction with the conversion of hip fusion to THA was only 5.3%. Composite rates of revision, instability, and aseptic loosening were 13.6%, 3.8%, and 8.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Conversion of fused hips to THA results in favourable long-term outcomes regarding HHS, LLD, survival rates, and subjective satisfaction, leading to improved quality of life in properly selected patients. However, the presence of complications should be considered when evaluating the overall success of the procedure.

A survey on the effects of patient safety training programs based on SBAR and FMEA techniques on the level of self-efficacy and observance of patient safety culture in Iran hospital, Shiraz in 2022-2023.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient safety and medical personnel self-efficacy are among the main factors involved in providing quality health services. Moreover, safety culture in an organization is considered one of the most critical factors regarding patients' safety. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effects of patient safety programs based on Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) and Failure Model Effects Analysis (FMEA) techniques on self-efficacy and patient safety culture in Iran Hospital of Shiraz in 2022-2023. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This two-stage quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2022-2033. Considering inclusion criteria, the present study included 80 nurses working in Iran Hospital. The participants were divided into groups of SBAR (40 participants) and FMEA (40 participants). All the data were collected using a Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire and Sherer General Self-Efficacy Scale. Then, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS 13, Fisher's exact test, paired t-test, and independent t-test with a significant level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean score of total patient safety culture between the two groups was insignificant before the intervention (P = 0.58). However, it was more significant in the FMEA group than the SBAR group after the intervention (P < 0/05). In addition, the mean self-efficacy score between the two groups was insignificant before the intervention (P = 0.80). However, after the intervention, the mean score of the FMEA group was significantly higher than the SBAR group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to the findings of this study, there is a meaningful relationship between patient safety training programs based on SBAR and FMEA techniques on patient safety and self-efficacy of nurses; however, FMEA training has more positive effects on self-efficacy and patient safety compared to other techniques. As a result, these techniques, along with other plans, are recommended to authorities in order to help improve patient safety.

Effectiveness of Short-term Use of Gabapentin as Pre-emptive Analgesia in Reducing Pain after Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Background: Pain control after thoracoscopy is one of the important issues in patient health care. Pre-emptive analgesia can reduce acute postoperative pain and also prevent chronic pain. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gabapentin (GABA analog) as pre-emptive analgesia in reducing pain and reducing opiate consumption after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) surgery. Materials and Methods: In this study, 67 patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into two groups (31 placeboes and 36 gabapentin). Patients received two capsules (300 mg gabapentin capsules or placebo) on the night before surgery and again one hour before surgery. After completion of the operation, all patients were transferred to the recovery. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the visual analog scale (VAS) every 30 minutes and then after 2, 4, 6, 10, 24 hours. If patients had pain (VAS above 3), intravenous morphine was injected to relieve pain and the number of injections and the total dose of morphine administered was recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding VAS, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR) and saturated oxygen level (SaO2), urea, creatinine, and adverse effects. Conclusion: Preoperative gabapentin administration did not affect postoperative pain reduction, but morphine consumption in the gabapentin group was decreased during the first 24 hours after VATS.

Transcription errors observed in a teaching hospital.

Medication errors are among the most common medical errors in the hospitals. Transcription error is a specific type of medication errors and is due to data entry error that is commonly made by the human operators. This study was designed to detect transcription errors in a teaching hospital in Tehran. Direct observational method was used in this study. Error was defined as any deviation in transcribing medication order from the previous step (order on the order sheet, administration nursing note and/or cardex, documentation of the order in the pharmacy database). A total of 287 charts with 558 opportunities for error were reviewed. Of those opportunities for error 167 (29.9%) resulted in an error. Omission (the patient did not receive the medication that was ordered) was the highest (52%) transcription error type seen in this study. The evaluation clearly showed that errors at transcription stage were not infrequent. To cut these errors down we suggest implementation of surveillance systems, which might help to decrease medication errors.