Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 5-year Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are two of the surgical options for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of PAE and TURP for LUTS/BPO treatment at long-term follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, open-label, single-centre trial at a Swiss tertiary care centre. The main outcome was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after PAE versus TURP. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, and adverse events assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 mo. Between-group differences in the change from baseline to 5 yr were tested using two-sided Mann-Whitney and t tests. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 103 patients with refractory LUTS/BPO who were randomised between 2014 and 2017, 18/48 who underwent PAE and 38/51 who underwent TURP reached the 60-mo follow-up visit. The mean reduction in IPSS from baseline to 5 yr was -7.78 points after PAE and -11.57 points after TURP (difference 3.79 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.66 to 8.24; p = 0.092). TURP was superior for most patient-reported secondary outcomes except for erectile function. At 5 yr, PAE was less effective than TURP regarding objective parameters, such as the improvement in maximum urinary flow rate (3.59 vs 9.30 ml/s, difference -5.71, 95% CI -10.72 to -0.70; p = 0. 027) and reduction in postvoid residual volume (27.81 vs 219.97 ml; difference 192.15, 95% CI 83.79-300.51; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The improvement in LUTS/BPO at 5 yr after PAE was inferior to that achieved with TURP. The limitations of PAE should be considered during patient selection and counselling. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we show the long-term results of prostate artery embolisation (PAE) in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of benign prostate enlargement causing urinary symptoms. PAE shows good long-term results in properly selected patients, although the improvements are less pronounced than with TURP. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02054013.

Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single Center Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective single-center, single-arm, pilot study, 9 men with advanced PCa underwent PAE. PAE was performed with the use of 250-400 µm Embozene microspheres (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA). International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), urinary peak flow (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) was assessed at 12 weeks and up to 12 months. Changes in total prostate volume (TPV) and tumor responses by PSA, changes in tumor volume and evaluation of tumor regression by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were assessed at 12 weeks after PAE. RESULTS: IPSS reduction in median 6 points (0-19) and a significant decrease in PVR from median 70 (20-600) mL to 10 (0-280) mL could be achieved within 12 weeks after PAE. Median TPV and tumor volumes (TV) increased slightly from 19.7 (6.4-110.8) mL to 23.4 (2.4-66.3) mL and 6.4 (4.6-18.3) mL to 8.1 (2.4-25.6) mL at a median of 12 weeks after the procedure. Significant tumor necrosis (≥ 50%) was found in one patient. Eight patients showed > 50% of viable tumor on post-PAE MRI according to MRI. Only one Clavien-Dindo Grade 1 adverse event related to PAE occurred. CONCLUSIONS: PAE with the use of 250-400 µm microspheres is feasible, safe and effective in some patients with advanced PCa regarding functional outcomes. A cytoreductive effect might be achieved in individual patients but must be further assessed. TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03457805.

[Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4]. / Minimalinvasive Therapien des benignen Prostatasyndroms : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 ­ Teil 4/4.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive for benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) are one of the most frequent diseases in men and can have a significant impact on quality of life. Instrumental therapies are common, and many patients seek minimally invasive treatment options. OBJECTIVE: Presentation and evidence-based evaluation of the minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary and overview of chapters 11-13 on minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO of the current long version of the German S2e guideline. RESULTS: In case of absolute indication for surgery or after unsatisfactory or undesired medical therapy, minimally invasive treatments such as UroLift® (Neotract Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA), Rezá¿¡m™ (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA, USA), iTIND™ (Olympus America Inc., Westborough, MA, USA), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) can be considered. These indirect/delayed ablative therapies offer lower morbidity and the possibility of performing them under local anesthesia, but they are inferior to direct ablative/resective techniques in terms of effectiveness and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: The updated German S2e guideline summarizes evidence-based recommendations for new minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO, which present alternative treatment options for selected patients.

Guidance of adjuvant instillation in intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer by drug screens in patient derived organoids: a single center, open-label, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: In intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) clinical guidelines suggest an adjuvant instillation with a chemotherapeutic agent. However, the agent and regimen are not clearly defined. Worldwide, less than 15% of patients receive this adjuvant chemotherapeutic instillation. We recently developed a pipeline for the generation of patient derived organoids (PDO) in NMIBC. In this phase II trial, we aim to use our in vitro pipeline to select the most effective drug for chemotherapeutic instillation in NMIBC patients. METHODS: Patients with first diagnosis of intermediate-risk NMIBC that are directed to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) are enrolled. During TURBT, tumor is sampled, and specimens are directed to generate PDO. Once the PDO are formed, drug screens on them for Epirubicin, Mitomycin C, Gemcitabine and Docetaxel are performed. The drug with the highest antitumor activity in vitro will then be selected for 6 adjuvant intravesical instillations once weekly. Thereafter, patients are followed according to clinical guidelines by cystoscopy. DISCUSSION: The aim of this trial is to use drug screens in PDO to precise treatment selection for adjuvant instillation therapies in patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC. The ultimate goal of this trial is to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. In the future, we aim to conduct clinical multicenter trials with an increased sample size, a broader panel of compounds and a focus on the reduction of cancer recurrence by precision delivery of care. Trial registration NCT05024734.

[Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) - Endo-vascular Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Presumed Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction]. / Prostataarterien-Embolisation (PAE).

Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) - Endo-vascular Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Presumed Secondary to Benign Prostatic Obstruction Abstract: Based on the available evidence on efficacy and safety in the short to midterm, Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) is now endorsed by international evidence-based guidelines as a treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms presumed secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) for selected patients. As PAE has a unique treatment approach (i.e., endovascular instead of transurethral), its profile and ideal application differ clearly from other treatments of LUTS/BPO, which must be considered for patient selection. Performance in local anesthesia with ongoing anticoagulation and no upper prostate size limitation represent advantages of the technique. Limited availability, an inferior relief of obstruction associated with higher retreatment rates and inferior outcomes in small prostates represent disadvantages. This should be considered for patient selection and counselling.

Comparison of traditional outcome measures and self-assessed goal achievement in patients treated surgically for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: To determine self-assessed goal achievement (SAGA) outcomes in men treated surgically for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and compare them to the traditional outcome measures. METHODS: Single-center analysis of prospective database of men undergoing surgical treatment of LUTS/BPO at a single institution between July 2019 and March 2021. We assessed individual goals, traditional questionnaires, and functional outcomes prior to treatment, and at first follow-up after 6-12 weeks. We compared SAGA outcomes 'overall goal achievement' and 'satisfaction with treatment' to subjective and objective outcomes using Spearman's rank correlations (rho). RESULTS: A total of sixty-eight patients completed the individual goal formulation prior to surgery. Preoperative goals varied between different treatments and individuals. IPSS correlated with 'overall goal achievement' (rho = - 0.78, p < 0.001) and 'satisfaction with treatment' (rho = - 0.59, p < 0.001). Similarly, the IPSS-QoL was correlated with overall goal achievement (rho = - 0.79, p < 0.001) and satisfaction with treatment (rho = - 0.65, p < 0.001). No correlation was seen between SAGA outcomes and functional outcomes Qmax and PVR. CONCLUSIONS: SAGA represents a uniquely patient-specific outcome measure. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to assess patient-specific goals prior to surgery and examine SAGA outcomes following treatment in men suffering from LUTS/BPO. The correlation of SAGA outcomes with IPSS and IPSS-QoL highlight the importance of this well-established questionnaire. Functional outcomes do not necessarily reflect patient's goals and may rather be considered physician-directed outcomes.

Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is increasingly performed worldwide for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In contrast, the role of PAE in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review summarizes the current available literature on PAE in patients with PCa regarding oncological and functional outcome. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. A structured search for the relevant literature from 1985 to 2022 was performed in Medline, Embase, and York CRD. Risk of bias and confounding assessments were performed using the ROBINS tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Thirteen trials (12 case series and one animal study using a canine model) were included in this systematic review. Four studies had a prospective study design. The risk of bias was rated moderate to serious in all the studies. CONCLUSIONS: PAE in patients with PCa seems to be a safe procedure and effective regarding the improvement of LUTS. Despite PAE having been shown to be feasible in different treatment scenarios of localized or advanced PCa, the oncological benefits are debatable due to an unreliable tumor response and a lack of controlled trials including long-term follow-up. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the literature to determine the role of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with prostate cancer regarding oncological and functional outcomes. The results suggest a similar safety profile and efficacy in terms of functional outcomes to those reported earlier for PAE in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The role of PAE regarding oncological outcomes has to be assessed further.

Prostatic Artery Embolisation: Do We Still Need It and for Whom?

Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is now endorsed by international evidence-based guidelines as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms presumed secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) for selected patients. PAE is a truly minimally invasive technique, with proven efficacy and safety demonstrated for the short- to mid-term. As it has a unique treatment approach (endovascular instead of transurethral), its profile and ideal application differ clearly from other treatments for LUTS/BPO, which must be considered for patient selection. This mini review examines the role of PAE in the treatment of LUTS/BPO on the basis of current evidence. PATIENT SUMMARY: For properly selected patients, prostatic artery embolisation (PAE), in which arteries feeding the prostate are blocked in a nonsurgical procedure, is one of the treatment options for obstruction of urine outflow caused by benign enlargement of the prostate. This article examines the role of PAE according to the evidence available in the literature.

In-hospital cost analysis of aquablation compared with transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement.

PURPOSE: To compare in-hospital treatment costs of aquablation and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient data and procedural details were derived from a prospective database. In-hospital costs were calculated using detailed expenditure reports provided by the hospital accounts department. Total costs including those arising from surgical procedures, consumables, personnel and accommodation were analysed for 24 consecutive patients undergoing aquablation and compared with 24 patients undergoing TURP during the same period. Mean total costs and mean costs for individual expense items were compared between treatment groups with t-tests. RESULTS: Mean total costs per patient (± standard deviation) were higher for aquablation at EUR 10,994 ± 2478 than for TURP at EUR 7445 ± 2354. The mean difference of EUR 3549 was statistically significant (p <0.001). Although the mean procedural costs were significantly higher for aquablation (mean difference EUR 3032; p <0.001), costs apart from the procedure were also lower for TURP, but the mean difference of EUR 1627 was not significant (p <0.327). Medical supplies were mainly responsible (mean difference EUR 2057; p <0.001) for the difference in procedural costs. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital costs are significantly higher for aquablation than for TURP, mainly due to higher costs of medical supplies for the procedure. This difference should be taken into consideration, at least in patients for whom the different side effect profiles of both treatments are irrelevant.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review of Currently Available Techniques Including Prostatic Artery Embolization, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Prostatic Urethral Lift, Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device and Aquablation.

A 66-years old male patient presents with lower urinary tract symptoms, mostly due to obstructive symptoms, and an enlarged prostate with 80 cm3, with a broad-based median lobe, suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) was proposed. However, the patient desired to preserve ejaculatory function and was afraid of a potential negative impact on erectile function. Thus, the patient inquired about minimally invasive therapies (MITs) as alternatives to TURP. In this review, currently available MITs for BPO are described including prostatic artery embolization, water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum®), prostatic urethral lift, iTIND® (temporary implantable device) and aquablation (Aquabeam®). Focus is given on the description of the technique, level of evidence and advantages over conventional surgical options.

Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is a highly prevalent and disabling condition; nevertheless, standard treatments often remain unsatisfactory. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a well-established therapy for non-NLUTD, but there is a lack of randomized controlled trials to show benefit in patients with NLUTD. METHODS: For this sham-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial, patients with refractory NLUTD (and intended SNM) were recruited at four Swiss SNM referral centers. After lead placement into the sacral foramina S3 (rarely, S4), all participants underwent SNM testing. If successful (≥50% improvement in key bladder diary variables), the neurostimulator was implanted for permanent stimulation. For 2 months, neuromodulation was optimized using subsensory stimulation with individually adjusted parameters. Thereafter, the neurostimulator remained on or was switched off (1:1 random allocation to group SNM ON or SNM OFF, respectively) for 2 months, followed by a neurourologic reevaluation. The primary outcome was success, as defined above, of SNM compared with baseline. RESULTS: Of 124 patients undergoing SNM testing, 65 (52%) had successfully improved lower urinary tract function. Of these, 60 patients (median age, 49.5 years; 43 women) were randomly assigned to the intervention. After 2 months of intervention, the SNM ON group demonstrated a success rate of 76%. In the SNM OFF group, 42% of patients showed sustained SNM effects despite their neurostimulator being switched off during the last 2 months (odds ratio, 4.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 to 13.21; P=0.009). During the entire study period, there were 11 adverse events (6 dropouts; no dropouts during the intervention phase). CONCLUSIONS: SNM effectively corrected refractory NLUTD in the short term in well-selected neurologic patients. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, Vontobel­Stiftung, Gottfried und Julia Bangerter­Rhyner Stiftung, Dr. Urs Mühlebach, and the Swiss Continence Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02165774.)

Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in medium-to-large-sized prostates (ATHLETE): protocol of a prospective randomised trial.

INTRODUCTION: A novel method for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) called Aquablation has become commercially available. Previous studies have been able to show similar functional results when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate and a high efficacy has been demonstrated when this approach is applied to patients with a prostate size of 80-150 cm3.Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a well-established procedure in the surgical treatment of BPH in prostate glands larger than 30 mL and a first-line therapy in glands over 80 mL. To date, no data are available whether Aquablation is non-inferior compared with HoLEP in the treatment of patients with medium-to-large-sized prostates regarding safety and efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial conducted at a Swiss centre of tertiary care. The primary outcome is assessment of non-inferiority of Aquablation compared with HoLEP in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Randomisation will be performed using secuTrial, stratifying on age (<70 years, 70+ years) and prostate volume (<100 mL, 100+ mL). Both interventions are performed in an inpatient setting and regular follow-up controls starting 8 weeks after intervention and continuing up to 5 years will be performed. The primary outcome (change in IPSS from baseline to 6 months) will be tested for non-inferiority with a one-sided t-test. Secondary outcomes, such as efficacy parameters, several patient-reported outcome measures, and periprocedural and safety parameters will be described by calculating means or relative frequencies for each treatment group and testing differences with two-sided standard superiority tests. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the local ethics committee (EKOS 2020-02353). Results of the primary endpoint and each of the secondary endpoints will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04560907).

Focal bladder neck cautery associated with low rate of post-Aquablation bleeding.

INTRODUCTION To determine if focal bladder neck cautery is effective in reducing bleeding following prostate tissue resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia using Aquablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients at 11 countries in Asia, Europe and North America who underwent Aquablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between late 2019 and January 2021 were included in the analysis. All patients received post-Aquablation non-resective focal cautery at the bladder neck. RESULTS: A total of 2,089 consecutive Aquablation procedures were included. Mean prostate size was 87 cc (range 20 cc to 363 cc). Postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 17 cases (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%-1.3%) and take-back to the operating room for fulguration occurred in 12 cases (0.6%, 95% CI 0.3%-1.0%). This result compares favorably (p < .0001) to the previously published hemostasis transfusion rate of 3.9% (31/801) using methods performed in the years 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: In prostates sizes averaging 87cc (range 20 cc-363 cc), Aquablation procedures performed with focal bladder neck cautery that required a transfusion postoperatively occurred in a remarkably low number of cases.

Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients under Sacral Neuromodulation with an InterStim Neuromodulator.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients under sacral neuromodulation (InterStim II). METHODS: Data of patients who received a sacral neuromodulator at the urological department of a Swiss center of tertiary care from 2007 to 2018 and subsequently received at least 1 MRI with implanted device were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, data on implantation, MRI characteristics and complications potentially related to the MRI were analyzed. In addition, patient interviews were performed to verify the data gathered from patient records. RESULTS: A total of 55 consecutive patients with a median age of 48 years (range 16 - 80 years) and a total of 191 MRIs (median 3, range 1 - 13) were included to the study. The majority of MRIs (92%) were performed with 1.5 Tesla. The majority of the 1.5 Tesla (58%) as well as 3 Tesla (56%) MRIs assessed body regions other than the head. Complication possibly related to the MRI were only found in 2 (1%) MRI scans in two patients who reported on transient electrifying pain and heat sensation at the implantation site of the neuromodulator during MRI. CONCLUSION: MRI scans in patients with an implanted InterStim II sacral neuromodulator and with the device being turned off seem to be safe, even if they involve body regions other than the head, at least with 1.5 Tesla.

Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial.

BACKGROUND: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) still remains under investigation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of PAE and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of LUTS/BPO at 2 yr of follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomised, open-label trial was conducted. There were 103 participants aged ≥40 yr with refractory LUTS/BPO. INTERVENTION: PAE versus TURP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and other questionnaires, functional measures, prostate volume, and adverse events were evaluated. Changes from baseline to 2 yr were tested for differences between the two interventions with standard two-sided tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean reduction in IPSS after 2 yr was 9.21 points after PAE and 12.09 points after TURP (difference of 2.88 [95% confidence interval 0.04-5.72]; p = 0.047). Superiority of TURP was also found for most other patient-reported outcomes except for erectile function. PAE was less effective than TURP regarding the improvement of maximum urinary flow rate (3.9 vs 10.23 ml/s, difference of -6.33 [-10.12 to -2.54]; p < 0.001), reduction of postvoid residual urine (62.1 vs 204.0 ml; 141.91 [43.31-240.51]; p = 0.005), and reduction of prostate volume (10.66 vs 30.20 ml; 19.54 [7.70-31.38]; p = 0.005). Adverse events were less frequent after PAE than after TURP (total occurrence n = 43 vs 78, p = 0.005), but the distribution among severity classes was similar. Ten patients (21%) who initially underwent PAE required TURP within 2 yr due to unsatisfying clinical outcomes, which prevented further assessment of their outcomes and, therefore, represents a limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Inferior improvements in LUTS/BPO and a relevant re-treatment rate are found 2 yr after PAE compared with TURP. PAE is associated with fewer complications than TURP. The disadvantages of PAE regarding functional outcomes should be considered for patient selection and counselling. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostatic artery embolisation is safe and effective. However, compared with transurethral resection of the prostate, its disadvantages regarding subjective and objective outcomes should be considered for individual treatment choices.

Reasons to consider prostatic artery embolization.

PURPOSE: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has emerged as a truly minimally invasive treatment option for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms presumed secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) over the last few years and is now supported by evidence-based international guidelines. Here, we provide an overview on the profile of PAE based on the most relevant and recent literature. METHODS: A comprehensive review of literature on PAE was conducted on PubMed-Medline. The most relevant literature was summarized narratively. RESULTS: While there is still a lack of long-term data, efficacy and safety data have been published for the short to mid-term. As with any minimally invasive technique, relief of bladder outlet obstruction is less pronounced after PAE compared to more invasive resective techniques. This is likely to be associated with higher re-intervention rates during the longer term. However, due to its beneficial safety profile, PAE represents an interesting option for many patients and could fill a niche between pharmacotherapy and formal surgical intervention. Given its unique treatment approach, i.e. endovascular instead of transurethral, PAE has a clearly different profile compared to other minimally invasive treatments. Performance with local anesthesia with possible continuation of anticoagulant drugs and no upper prostate size limit are the most important advantages of PAE. CONCLUSION: PAE represents a valuable supplement in the treatment armamentarium of LUTS/BPH if patients are selected appropriately.

Informative value of histological assessment of tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To determine the histological validity of the tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostatic tissue of 12 patients that consecutively underwent aquablation for benign prostatic enlargement was systematically examined. Histological examination was performed by two experienced uropathologists using a digital slide scanner and slide viewer software (Pannoramic 250 and Case Viewer 2.3, 3D Histech, Hungary). The surface areas of the assessable glands were examined and set in relation to the total surface area of the material available for histology and to the patient's total prostate volume. Examinations were performed analogously in ten consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to facilitate interpretation of the results. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A median of 4.06% (range 1.43-7.5%) of the preoperative total prostate volume (median 64.5 ml (range 40-80 ml)) was obtained for histological examination by aquablation. Due to severe mechanical destruction and fragmentation, only a proportion of 0.43% (0.06-1.79%) of this tissue represented histologically assessable glands. Therefore, roughly 0.017% of the total prostatic volume was available for a reliable histological examination. In comparison, 32.5% (6.67-37.5%) of the total prostate volume was removed by TURP and 22.86% (7.45-40.57%) of this tissue represented informative prostatic glands, corresponding to 7.43% of the total prostate volume. CONCLUSION: Histological significance of the tissue obtained by aquablation of the prostate is very limited. Costs and effort of the histological examination must, therefore, be weighed critically against the limited informative value.

Reduction of stent-associated morbidity by minimizing stent material: a prospective, randomized, single-blind superiority trial assessing a customized 'suture stent'.

OBJECTIVES: To compare a customized 'suture stent' with a standard ureteric stent regarding stent-related symptoms, safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with urolithiasis located proximal to the iliac vessel crossing, requiring stenting in preparation for secondary ureterorenoscopy (URS) were randomized to standard ureteric stenting or a suture stent. Secondary ureterorenoscopy was performed 2-6 weeks later. The Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) was completed after 1 week, on the day before URS and 2-6 weeks after stent removal. Stent efficacy and safety were systematically assessed. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included in the analysis. The median (range) suture stent length was 10 (5-25) cm vs 26 cm for standard stents. Operation time was longer for insertion of the suture stent (24.0 vs 14.5 min; P < 0.001). Patients with a suture stent had a significantly lower USSQ urinary symptoms score 1 week after stent insertion, adjusted for baseline symptoms by subtracting scores from the final visit without indwelling stent (mean 7.1 vs 13.7, difference -6.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.4 to -9.8; P < 0.001). Prior to secondary URS (after 2-6 weeks), baseline-adjusted urinary symptoms (mean 4.7 vs 12.2, difference -7.5, 95% CI -4.5 to -10.4; P < 0.001) and pain subscores (11.5 vs 17.6, difference -6.1, 95% CI -0.7 to -11.6; P = 0.004) were significantly lower in the suture stent group. All other USSQ subscores showed no significant differences. Adverse events occurred in 15 patients and were similarly frequent in the two groups. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding ureteric access during secondary URS. CONCLUSION: Replacement of the distal part of ureteric stents by a suture can reduce stent-associated symptoms without restrictions regarding secondary stone removal or safety.

The German linguistic validation of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire (WisQoL).

PURPOSE: WisQoL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire) is a disease specific, health related quality of life measure designed for patients who form kidney stones. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a German version of WisQoL. METHODS: The German version of the WisQoL was developed following a standardized multistep process. Patients were recruited prior to stone treatment, and completed the questionnaire as well as the SF-36v2 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey). This was repeated 1, 3, and 6 months after stone surgery. Scores of the 28 questionnaire items were summarized into sum scores for four domains and a total score. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The German WisQoL demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.90 for all domains at all visits). All inter-domain associations were positive. The test-retest reliability for patients with unchanged self-reported health state was considered satisfactory (Spearman's rho for total score 0.70 [95% CI 0.55 to - 0.80]). The German WisQoL demonstrated good convergent validity with the validated SF-36v2 (correlation between corresponding items 0.44 to 0.64). All domain scores showed significant sensitivity to change induced by stone treatment (p ≤ 0.05). Total WisQoL scores generally improved during the first 3 months following stone treatment, and remained stable thereafter. CONCLUSION: The German WisQoL proved to be a reliable and robust instrument to evaluate health related quality of life measures of kidney stone patients in the clinical setting. It is expected to be of use for further research in patients with kidney stones.

Systematic assessment of information about surgical urinary stone treatment on YouTube.

PURPOSE: To systematically assess the quality of videos on the surgical treatment of urinary stones available on YouTube using validated instruments. METHODS: A systematic search for videos on YouTube addressing treatment options of urinary stones was performed in October 2019. Assessed parameters included basic data (e.g. number of views), the grade of misinformation reporting of conflicts of interest. Quality of content was analyzed using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 100 videos with a median of 26,234 views (1020-1,720,521) were included in the analysis. Of these, only 26 videos were rated to contain no misinformation and only nine disclosed potential conflicts of interest. Overall, the median quality of the videos was low (2 out of 5 points for DISCERN question 16). Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals and medical societies/organizations offered significantly higher levels of quality. In particular, the videos provided by the EAU achieved the highest rating with a median score of 3.0. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of videos concerning the surgical treatment of urinary stones have a low quality of content, are potentially subject to commercial bias and do not report on conflicts of interest. Videos provided by medical societies, such as the EAU, provide a higher level of quality. This highlights the importance of active recommendation of evidence-based patient education materials.