ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neurofibromas are benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors usually featured with neurofibromatosis type 1 syndrome. Recurrent gingival neurofibromas have been rarely reported in the periodontal literature, particularly affecting elderly patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 70-year-old man with a pale, rubbery, and painless thickening along the facial/buccal gingiva of the mandibular right canine and first premolar. Ten years prior, the patient had undergone excision of a neurofibroma within the same region. The patient denied a history of cutaneous disease or neurofibromatosis. Histopathologic and immunostaining of the excised lesion confirmed the diagnosis as a recurrent gingival neurofibroma. CONCLUSIONS: With cases of suspected recurrent neurofibroma, attending practitioners should consult with an oral pathologist whether the primary lesion had exhibited tumor cells to the surgical specimen margin. Preoperative use of a cone beam computed tomography scan may enhance determination of tumor depth. Clinicians should also carefully weigh the decision for conservative excision of gingival neurofibromas and greater risk of recurrence versus performing a somewhat wider extirpation and possible formation of a mucogingival defect. KEY POINTS: What are important clinical considerations when performing a gingival biopsy? Gingival neurofibromas may be associated with an increased risk for recurrence owing to decisions for tissue-sparing excision and prevention of a mucogingival defect; supplemental use of cone beam computed tomographic scans may provide greater appreciation of tumor depth. What is a reasonable length of time of postoperative assessment for gingival neurofibromas? Patients who have undergone surgical removal of a gingival neurofibroma should undergo yearly surveillance for at least 10 years. What is a key limitation to this case study? Preoperatively, attending clinicians should consult with an oral pathologist to ascertain whether a primary lesion had manifested tumor cells to the surgical margin. Conservative gingival resection of a neurofibroma may promote recurrence.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the perception of trained dental professionals and laypersons toward the esthetic impact of variations in the vertical position, width, and gingival height of the maxillary lateral incisor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study analyzed the perspective of smile photographs by dental professionals such as "fifty orthodontics and fifty general dental practitioners (GDPs)" as well as fifty laypersons, consisting of an equal number of male and female participants. Photographs edited to depict alteration of golden proportion, incisal length, and gingival height of lateral incisor. SPSS software was used to analyze the data and determine the significant difference within all the participants, at 0.05% level (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in ranking between the genders. Golden proportion of 62%-67% were ranked the highest by orthodontists, whereas GDPs and laypersons preferred 67%. Regarding gingival display, corrected height of -0.5 and -1 mm received highest ranking from all the three groups. In case of lateral incisal length, -0.5 mm was ranked highest by laypersons, in contrast to -1 mm by orthodontists and GDPs. CONCLUSION: Specific differences were observed in the ranking of smile esthetics by health-care professionals and laypersons. Golden proportion of 62% and 67% were ranked the highest by orthodontists, whereas GDPs and laypersons preferred 67%. Corrected gingival height of -0.5 and -1 mm received highest ranking from all the three groups. In case of lateral incisal length, -0.5 mm was ranked highest by laypersons, in contrast to -1 mm by orthodontists and GDPs.
