Re-fractures of the paediatric radius and/or ulna: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the radius and/or ulna are one of the most common injuries in children. Evidence identifying risk factors for refracture, however, has not been summarised in a systematic review. Guidance for counselling patients and parents to minimise the risk of refracture is limited. The aims of this study are to 1) to determine if casting time 6 weeks or less is a risk factor for refracture after paediatric radius and/or ulna fractures, 2) to identify other risk factors for refracture after paediatric radius and/or ulna fractures and 3) to develop more accurate guidelines for counselling parents after a radius and/or ulna fracture in their child. METHODS: A thorough search was performed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for systematic review. JBI Critical Appraisal checklists were used for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Diaphyseal both-bone fractures treated non-surgically should be casted for longer than 6 weeks. Surgically treated patients can be casted for less than 6 weeks. Diaphyseal and greenstick fractures have a higher risk of refracture. Residual angulation and incomplete healing in greenstick fractures may lead to a higher risk of refracture. Gender does not affect refracture risk. Falls, use of wheeled vehicles, playground activities and trampolining confer high-risk of refracture. Refracture risk is greatest up to 9 months from initial fracture. CONCLUSION: Further case-controlled studies with sub-group analysis are required to further investigate risk factors for refracture after radius and/or ulna fractures in children.

Association between atrial fibrillation and hip fractures and the implications for hip fracture patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and hip fractures are both prevalent in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding the association between AF and hip fractures, and the impact of AF on hip fracture prognosis. METHODS: The literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus. Inclusion was based upon the application of eligibility criteria in duplicate prior to data extraction with a standardized form. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. AF prevalence was found to vary between 6.5% and 35% in cohorts. Large studies with broad inclusion criteria found the prevalence of AF in hip fracture patients to be approximately 12-15%. There were conflicting results as to whether patients with AF have an increased rate of hip fractures, as compared to patients without AF. Several studies demonstrated that hip fracture patients with AF have increased rates of mortality, both as an inpatient and following discharge, and increased readmission rates. CONCLUSION: AF and hip fractures frequently coexist, and there is evidence to suggest AF is associated with increased readmission and mortality rates in hip fracture patients. Elements of the relationship between AF and hip fractures remain uncertain and further prospective studies on AF and hip fracture cohorts may clarify this relationship. Interventional studies targeting hip fracture patients with AF may be beneficial.