ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Venous stenosis is a common complication of transvenous lead implantation, but the risk factors for venous stenosis have not been well defined to date. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for venous stenosis in a large consecutive cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 212 consecutive patients (136 male, 76 female; mean age 69 years) with existing pacing or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems presented for generator replacement, lead revision, or device upgrade with a mean time since implantation of 6.2 years. Venograms were performed and percentage of stenosis was determined. Variables studied included age, sex, number of leads, lead diameter, implant duration, insulation material, side of implant, and anticoagulant use. Overall, 56 of 212 patients had total occlusion of the subclavian or innominate vein (26%). There was a significant association between the number of leads implanted and percentage of venous stenosis (P=0.012). Lead diameter, as an independent variable, was not a risk factor; however, greater sum of the lead diameters implanted was a predictor of subsequent venous stenosis (P=0.009). Multiple lead implant procedures may be associated with venous stenosis (P=0.057). No other variables approached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association exists between venous stenosis and the number of implanted leads and also the sum of the lead diameters. When combined with multiple implant procedures, the incidence of venous stenosis is increased.
Subject(s)
Brachiocephalic Veins , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Subclavian Vein , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachiocephalic Veins/diagnostic imaging , Constriction, Pathologic , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iowa/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Phlebography , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Subclavian Vein/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve left ventricular (LV) function and exercise performance in patients with left bundle branch block. Patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) do not have a similar positive response to standard CRT. We hypothesized that single site pacing of the right ventricular septum (RVS) near the proximal right bundle could restore more normal activation of the LV in RBBB patients. METHODS: 78 consecutive patients (56 M, 22 F) with baseline RBBB underwent pacemaker or ICD implantation. Leads were placed in the right atrium and RVS. RESULTS: Baseline QRS duration was 120-220 ms (mean QRSd = 147 ms). At the optimal AV delay, the fused QRSd was 56-160 ms (mean QRSd = 112 ms). The mean decrease in QRSd was 34 ± 20.4 ms (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: RVS pacing in patients with RBBB resulted in a marked decrease in QRS duration and often normalized the ECG.
Subject(s)
Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bundle-Branch Block/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/complications , Ventricular SeptumABSTRACT
Electrical cardioversion (EC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common procedure performed in an attempt to restore normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Many factors predict long-term maintenance of NSR and the risk of AF recurrence. The duration of AF, cardiac size and function, rheumatic heart disease, significant mitral valve disease, left atrial enlargement, and older age are among the most common recognized factors. A number of interventions can potentially decrease the AF recurrence rate. Identifying and treating reversible causes and the use of antiarrhythmic medications in certain situations can help decrease the risk of AF recurrence. The role of the newer anticoagulants is expanding, and wider application is expected in the near future. We hope that this summary will serve as a guide to physicians and healthcare providers to address the question of who should undergo cardioversion, as there are patients who are most likely to benefit from this procedure and others that will revert back into AF within a short period. To identify who would benefit most from EC and have a reasonable chance of long-term maintenance of NSR, a thorough evaluation of each individual patient should be performed to tailor the best therapy to each individual.
