Low anterior resection syndrome following rectal cancer surgery: are incidence and severity lower with long-term follow-up?

BACKGROUND: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a functional disorder that may follow restorative proctectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence and risk factors for LARS following surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients from a prospectively maintained database, who underwent a restorative proctectomy between January 2014 and December 2019 at Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center. The study cohort was divided into two groups: patients following partial proctectomy with a partial mesorectal excision and a colorectal anastomosis (PME group) and patients following total proctectomy with total mesorectal excision and a coloanal anastomosis (TME group). The incidence and severity of LARS were evaluated using the LARS questionnaire. Risk factors for LARS were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients (male: female ratio 134:106, median age 64 years [interquartile range 55-71 years]) were included in the analysis. There were 160 patients in the PME group and 80 patients in the TME group. The overall incidence of LARS was 37.4% (26.5% major LARS and 10.9% minor LARS). Major LARS was observed in 53.8% of patients who underwent TME and in 12.7% of patients who underwent PME (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge, TME, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for LARS. The incidence and severity of LARS were significantly lower in patients with longer follow-up (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in LARS can be expected with longer follow-up. Distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge, TME and neoadjuvant radiotherapy are independent risk factors for LARS.

External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

BACKGROUND: Fistula-in-ano due to cryptoglandular disease is a common condition. While a simple anal fistula can be treated successfully by a fistulotomy, the risk of potential damage to the anal sphincters and subsequent poor functional outcomes persist in a large portion of patients with complex fistulae. Several sphincter-preserving treatment procedures have been described for complex fistulae over the past 3 decades, with variable results and complication rates, and no procedure is proven to be superior to the others. We developed external sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF), a reproducible simple modification of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano.. The aim of the present study was to describe the technique and our outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent ESSAF for a complex anal fistula at our institution from January 2014 to December 2019. The primary outcome measure of this study was the primary fistula healing rate. Secondary outcome measures included fecal and/or gas incontinence and postoperative complications. During the ESSAF procedure, the mucosa and skin overlying the fistula tract are incised to allow complete exposure of the sphincter complex. Then the internal sphincter muscle fibers overlying the tract are divided and the tract is meticulously curetted and debrided. Next, the internal opening of the tract traversing the external sphincter muscle is suture-ligated with absorbable sutures. Then, a minimal amount of mucosa is advanced and the incision is partially closed with absorbable sutures, while its external portion is left open for drainage. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients [43 males, median age was 50 years (range 36-63 years)] underwent ESSAF for complex anal fistula during the study period. Mean follow-up was 12 ± 14.7 months. Of the 59 patients, 42 (71.2%) experienced fistula closure, with a median healing time of 8 weeks (IQR 4-16 weeks). None of the patients developed significant anal incontinence following the procedure. One patient (1.7%) suffered from soiling and another patient (1.7%) developed postoperative bleeding. There were no infectious complications. Of the 17 patients (28.8%) who failed to heal successfully, 9 (15.2%) did not heal primarily and 8 (16%) experienced recurrence after complete healing. Thirteen (76%) of these patients underwent reoperation with complete recovery after ESSAF (n = 4), fistulotomy (n = 8) or endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) (n = 1). Overall ESSAF initiated recovery in 93.2% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: ESSAF is a feasible, safe, reproducible and effective sphincter-sparing procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulae.

Does caffeine enhance bowel recovery after elective colorectal resection? A prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus is a common condition following abdominal surgery. Previous studies have shown the positive effects of coffee on gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to assess whether caffeine is the stimulatory agent in coffee that triggers bowel motility and thus may reduce the duration of postoperative ileus. METHODS: This was a single-centered, prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Patients scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic colectomy between November 2017 and March 2019 were randomly assigned to receive either oral caffeine (100 mg three times daily) or placebo following the procedure. Primary endpoints were time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement. Secondary endpoints were time to tolerate a solid, low-residue diet and length of hospital stay. Registration number: NCT03097900. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, [35 males, median age 56 years (range 19-79 years)]. After the exclusion of 12 patients, there were 30 patients in the caffeine group and 28 patients in the placebo group. The first passage of stool in the caffeine group occurred 18 h earlier than in the placebo group (p = 0.012); other endpoints did not reach statistical significance. No caffeine-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Caffeine consumption following colectomy is safe, leads to a significantly shorter time to first bowel movement, and may thus potentially lead to a shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of fluorescence angiography (FA) on any change in proximal resection margin and/or anastomotic leak (AL) following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer (RC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at two centers by three senior surgeons. Both institutions' prospectively maintained Institutional Review Board-approved databases were retrospectively queried for all consecutive patients between July 2015 and May 2017 who had laparoscopic hybrid trans-abdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) and TaTME for RC with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis < 10 cm from the anal verge. All patients had intraoperative FA to assess colonic perfusion of the planned proximal resection margin before bowel transection and after construction of the anastomosis. Primary outcomes measured any changes in proximal resection margins and AL rates. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (31 males; mean age 63 ± 12 years) were included; 30 (55%) of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The average anastomotic height was 3.6 cm from the anal verge and 8 (14.5%) patients required intersphincteric dissection. Forty-six patients (85%) had loop ileostomy. FA led to a change in the proximal resection margin in 10 patients (18.5%), one of whom had AL on postoperative day 3 requiring diagnostic laparoscopy and loop ileostomy. A second patient, without a change in the proximal resection margin, also had an AL. The overall AL rate was 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS: FA changed the planned proximal resection margin in 18.5% of patients, possibly accounting for the relatively low AL rate. FA is imperfect, and subjective but does have the potential to improve outcomes.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: results of a comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) after low anterior resection (LAR) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, cost and cancer recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of fluorescence angiography (FA) on AL following LAR for low rectal cancer. METHODS: This is a single surgeon retrospective cohort study with a historical, consecutively sampled case matched control group. The institution's prospectively maintained institutional review board (IRB)-approved database was queried for all patients who underwent a laparoscopic LAR for rectal neoplasia with a colorectal or coloanal anastomosis < 5 cm from the anal verge between 2013 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: patients in whom FA was employed (study group, 2015-2016) and those patients in whom it was not (control group, 2013-2015). All patients were diverted with a loop ileostomy. The primary outcome measured was the AL rate and the secondary outcome measured was change in surgical plan following FA. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study: 30 patients in the FA group and 30 patients in the control group. Patients' demographics, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, tumor stage, and mean height of anastomosis were comparable between the study groups. FA led to a change in surgical plan in four patients (13.3%) none of who suffered an AL. Two patients in the control group had a clinically and radiologically confirmed AL, whereas there were no leaks in the FA group (6.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: FA changed the surgical plan in 13.3% of LAR's, potentially reducing the incidence of AL in these high-risk patients.

An enigma of spontaneous combined transdiaphragmatic, intercostal and abdominal wall hernia.

INTRODUCTION: Cough can be associated with many complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a 59-year-old male patient with a very rare combination of a cough-related stress fracture of the ninth rib and herniation through the diaphragm and abdominal wall to the subcutaneous tissue of the chest wall. We suggest thoracotomy through the affected intercostal defect as a surgical approach. The diaphragm, chest wall and abdominal tears were repaired separately, and the abdominal wall was reinforced with mesh. Technical aspects were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Though each individual injury is well documented in the literature, this is a rare combination of defects, requiring early recognition to provide repair before incarceration and further enlargement of the defects occur.

Trans-fascial laparoscopic mesh fixation: a procedural comparison using the standard suture passer versus iMESH stitcher™ device.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic mesh repair has become an increasingly common method for repairing incisional hernias. The current method for fixating mesh to the abdominal wall includes tacking the mesh to the peritoneum and fascia and suturing the mesh to the fascia with trans-fascial sutures. The iMESH Stitcher™ is a stitching device developed to both simplify and expedite this procedure by passing the suture from one arm of the iMESH stitcher™ to the other. The device enables a stitch to be created in three quick moves using only one hand. We compared both the efficacy and procedure time of trans-fascial mesh fixation when performed with the iMESH stitcher™ as compared to the standard suture passer method. METHODS: A mesh patch was installed on the internal abdominal wall of two pigs. Surgical residents and Medical students were participants in the study and were trained in both techniques. Each participant was asked to perform six fixations with each technique. The procedural time required for both fixation techniques was recorded. Participants were asked to assess subjectively the relative difficulty of each technique on a scale of 1-10 (10 = most difficult). RESULTS: Sixteen residents and students performed a total of 12 mesh fixations, each performing 6 fixations with each technique. Average mesh fixation suture time using the suture passer technique was 44 s for residents and 47 s for students. Average fixation suture time using the iMESH stitcherTM was 17 s for residents and 15 s for students. The average difficulty score for the suture passer technique was 6.1 as compared to 2.9 with iMESH stitcher™. CONCLUSION: Trans-fascial fixation with the iMESH Stitcher™ took significantly less time than the standard suture passer method. The iMESH Stitcher™ significantly simplifies the procedure of transfascial fixation and potentially reduces technical difficulties.