The influence of autoantibody profile, disease manifestations and demographic features on survival in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the influence of various clinical and immunological factors, including disease manifestations, autoantibody profile, age, gender, disease duration, and family history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), on patient survival outcomes. METHODS: A comparative analysis was conducted between survivors and non-survivors of SLE. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of each variable on mortality, allowing for a nuanced understanding of their respective contributions. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients were included in the study (187 survivors and 42 non-survivors). The median age at disease onset for survivors and non-survivors was 29 and 27.5 years respectively. A higher proportion of men was observed among non-survivors compared to survivors. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in mortality rates between individuals under 22 years and those 22 years or older, with 23.5% and 7.8% mortality rates, respectively (P = 0.042). Moreover, specific clinical factors were found to be associated with increased mortality, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), anemia, thrombocytopenia, pulmonary disease, and renal disease. Conversely, certain manifestations such as arthritis and alopecia were associated with a reduced risk of mortality. Of particular importance, PAH emerged as the strongest predictor of mortality (OR 37.9, P < 0.012). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study underscore the complex interplay between clinical and immunological factors in influencing survival outcomes in SLE patients. Specifically, the identification of PAH as a key predictor of mortality highlights the importance of comprehensive monitoring, early detection, and timely intervention strategies in the management of SLE patients to improve long-term prognosis.

Insights into systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective observational study of clinical features, autoantibodies, and gender-related differences.

This study aims to analyze the clinical and immunologic features of SLE in Jordan, while also investigating the impact of age and gender on disease presentation. The study included 275 patients diagnosed with SLE. Data were collected through meticulous patient interviews and thorough examination of patient hospital records. The cohort exhibited a mean age of 36.8 ± 12.9 years, with an average disease duration of 7.0 ± 7.8 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 29.9 ± 12.1 years, and the female to male ratio was 7.8:1. The most frequently observed symptoms were arthralgia (90.2%), fatigue (80.7%), hematologic manifestations (62%), photosensitivity (60.7%), Raynaud's phenomenon (53.5%), and malar rash (50.9%). The frequencies of various autoantibodies were as follows: ANA (96.7%), anti-dsDNA (39.6%), anti-SSA/Ro (32.8%), anti-Sm (21.8%), anti-U1-RNP (20.6%), and anti-SSB/La (15.5%). Male patients tended to receive a diagnosis at a younger age and exhibited a higher likelihood of experiencing severe manifestations compared to females. Additionally, juvenile onset patients demonstrated an increased likelihood of fever, photosensitivity, myositis, and anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, while adult onset patients were more predisposed to having anti-Ro, anti-La, and RF autoantibodies. This study reveals that the most prevalent manifestations of SLE in the Jordanian cohort encompassed arthralgia, fatigue, and hematologic manifestations. The prevalence of alopecia and Raynaud's phenomenon exceeded that observed in other published cohorts, while arthritis and discoid rash were less frequently encountered. The study highlights that males are more susceptible to developing severe manifestations of SLE compared to females.

Vaccination in the Era of Immunosuppression.

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) are at increased risk for severe infections. Vaccine responses and safety profiles may differ between AIIRD patients and the general population. While patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) often experience diminished humoral responses and reduced vaccine efficacy, factors such as the type of immunosuppressant medications used and the specific vaccine employed contribute to these outcomes. Notably, individuals undergoing B cell depletion therapy tend to have poor vaccine immunogenicity. However, despite these considerations, vaccine responses are generally considered clinically sufficient. Ideally, immunosuppressed AIIRD patients should receive vaccinations at least two weeks before commencing immunosuppressive treatment. However, it is common for many patients to already be on immunosuppressants during the immunization process. Vaccination rarely triggers flares in AIIRDs; if flares occur, they are typically mild. Despite the heightened infection risk, including COVID-19, among AIIRD patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and other diseases on immunosuppressants, the vaccination rates remain suboptimal. The future directions of vaccination in the era of immunosuppression will likely involve customized vaccines with enhanced adjuvants and alternative delivery methods. By addressing the unique challenges faced by immunosuppressed individuals, we may improve vaccine efficacy, reduce the risk of infections, and ultimately enhance the health outcomes. Additionally, clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temporarily discontinuing immunosuppressants during vaccination in various AIIRDs are crucial.