ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Taking into account the steady increase in the number of elderly patients requiring coronary artery bypass grafting, we sought to analyze the in-hospital and long-term evolution of a group of elderly patients (>/= 75 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and to identify clinical predictors of mortality and long-term symptoms. METHODS: Between April 1996 and February 2000, 207 patients older than 75 years of age who had undergone coronary bypass grafting were prospectively and consecutively analyze. Mean age was 78.4 +/- 2.7. RESULTS: An average of 2.6 grafts/patients was constructed. Left mammary artery was used in 93% of patients. The in-hospital incidence of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, preoperative infarction and stroke was 38%, 29%, 4.8% and 2.8% respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.8%. Mean follow-up was 18 months (25th an 75th percentiles 9-29). Late mortality rate was 4.1% in eight patients. Excluding the in-hospital deaths, the estimated probability of survival (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years was 94% and the survival freedom from symptoms was 86%. A multivariate analysis showed that only age was predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.16, p = 0.009). Only peripheral vascular disease was found as a predictor of symptoms during the long-term follow-up (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of senile patients who underwent coronary surgery, those of an older age (> 80 years) showed a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. The presence of peripheral vascular disease is useful in the prognosis assessment of the group.
Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Myocardial Revascularization/mortality , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The radial artery is being used with increasing frequency instead of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafts. We analyzed the in-hospital and midterm results in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in whom a combination of arterial grafts was used, including radial artery and one or both internal mammary arteries. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1998, 1,023 patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery using arterial conduits. The left internal mammary artery and the right internal mammary artery were employed in combination with the radial artery. RESULTS: An average of 3.2 grafts per patient were done. The left internal mammary artery and radial artery were used in 100% of patients, the right internal mammary artery in 21.7%, and a venous graft in 31%. The operative mortality rate was 2.5%. On repeat angiography performed in 62 patients before their discharge, the arterial conduits were patent in 98.4%. Mean follow-up was 25.0 +/- 9.6 months (1 to 48 months). The probability of survival was 92.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization using mammary and radial artery grafts is safe. Complications are not higher than those observed with saphenous vein grafting. It was possible to use arterial conduits in all the patients, even in those with impaired left ventricular function.
Subject(s)
Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Radial Artery/transplantation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Survival RateABSTRACT
A 47-year-old woman, diagnosed with a diverticulum of the arch of the azygos vein, underwent surgical treatment. With nonspecific symptomatology, she presented one of the most uncommon anomalies of the large veins.
Subject(s)
Azygos Vein/abnormalities , Diverticulum/surgery , Azygos Vein/pathology , Dilatation, Pathologic , Female , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of the present study was to analyze the in-hospital and mid term results obtained in 1,023 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in whom a combination of arterial grafts was used: radial arteries (RA) and one or both internal mammary arteries (IMA). METHODS: From May 1995 to May 1998, 1,023 consecutive patients underwent CABG alone, using arterial conduits (AC) (one or two IMA and RA) for myocardial revascularization. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was employed as an "in situ" graft, and the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) as a free graft or "in situ" both in combination with the RA. The latter was connected to the LIMA through a T or Y anastomosis, or emerged directly from the ascending portion of the aorta. RESULTS: An average of 3.2 bypasses per patient were performed. The LIMA was used in 100% of the patients. The RIMA was used in 21.7% and the RA in 100% of the cases. Operative mortality was 2.5% (26 patients) and 32 (3.1%) suffered perioperative acute myocardial infarction. The first 62 patients were angiographically re-studied before discharge, and a 98.4% patency of the AC used was found. Mean follow up time was 25.0 +/- 9.6 months (range, 1 to 48 months). CONCLUSIONS: a) myocardial revascularization procedures using a combination of mammary and RA grafts are safe; b) in-hospital and mid term morbidity and mortality are not higher than those observed with saphenous vein grafts; c) it is possible to achieve complete myocardial revascularization with only AC, even in patients with impaired left ventricular function, and d) AC can be used in elderly patients.