Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Urol Oncol ; 29(4): 366-71, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21592881

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We report on the feasibility and outcomes of the N-shaped pouch with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment as a new technique for creating a capacious, low pressure bladder substitute following radical cystectomy. METHODS: Between April 2000 and April 2006, 42 patients (36 male, 6 female) with invasive bladder cancer were considered good candidates for orthotopic urinary diversion. All had radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution by an ileal low pressure reservoir (N-shaped) with an afferent isoperistaltic tubular segment. Of the 42 patients, 36 (86%) had squamous cell carcinoma; 6 had transitional cell carcinoma. None of the patients had positive lymph nodes after pathologic examination of the specimen. The patients were available for a median follow-up period of 24.8 months. Follow-up included clinical and radiographic studies to determine functional and oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven patients (26.2%) had early complications during the period ≤ 3 months following surgery. Seven of these patients had complications such as wound infection, prolonged ileus, persistent urinary leakage, and deep venous thrombosis that were treated conservatively. One female patient developed a pouch-vaginal fistula that required repair. The remaining 3 patients had oncologic failures, 1 of which was isolated urethral recurrence. Late complications occurred in 15 patients (35.7%). These included pouch stones, outflow obstruction, mucus retention, and adhesive bowel obstruction. Daytime and night-time continence was achieved in 92% and 80% of the patients, respectively, and ureteroileal stricture was observed in 5%. The upper tracts remained unchanged or improved in nearly 95% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ileal orthotopic bladder substitution (N-shaped) with an afferent ileal tubular segment offers good functional results with good preservation of the renal units. It is considered a safe and technically feasible surgical procedure.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery , Cystectomy/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Reservoirs, Continent , Adult , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ileum/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urethral Stricture/etiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urodynamics , Venous Thrombosis/etiology
2.
J Endourol ; 25(5): 825-30, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21457084

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the necessity of ureteral stent placement after retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU) for upper ureteral stones more than 1 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2006 and May 2009, 104 RLUs were performed as primary management of large upper ureteral stones. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: In group 1 (52 patients), RLU was performed without stent placement afterward, and in group 2 (52 patients), the stent was placed after RLU. The mean stone size was 16.8 cm in group 1 and 18.2 cm in group 2. The stent in group 2 was placed cystoscopically. RESULTS: All procedures were performed successfully. The mean operative time was 48 minutes in group 1 vs. 65 minutes in group 2. The mean drainage time was 4.1 days in group 1 vs. 2.3 days in group 2. All the patients were followed up for a period of 6 months with no recorded cases of residual stone or ureteral stricture. CONCLUSION: RLU for large upper ureteral stones could be considered as a primary line for treatment as regards the economic status in developing countries. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) without stent placement for upper ureteral stones is safe, cost effective, has less operative time, and needs no auxiliary procedures when compared with the use of stent placement after LU, which adds costs and discomfort for the patient.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Stents , Ureter/surgery , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Demography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Postoperative Care , Retroperitoneal Space/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ureter/diagnostic imaging , Ureteral Calculi/diagnostic imaging , Urography
3.
J Endourol ; 25(4): 593-6, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21395489

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the success and outcomes of solo ultrasonography (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for management of a single stone pelvis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2008 to April 2010, the procedure was applied to 34 patients (22 men and 12 women) whose ages ranged from 25 to 55 years (mean 29.5 y) with unilateral single stone pelvis in a moderately to markedly dilated pelvicaliceal system (PCS). The stone size ranged from 20 to 30 mm (mean 24 mm). Middle caliceal puncture and dilation were performed in all cases by an experienced urologist under US guidance with a needle-guided system attached to the side wall of the US probe. The evaluation of the procedure included the success of accessing the stones, the occurrence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, the stone-free rate, and the need for auxiliary maneuver. RESULTS: The access was successful in all cases. Minor intraoperative complications occurred in two cases where PCS perforation was detected and was managed conservatively by Double-J stent insertion for 4 weeks. The only reported postoperative complication was fever in five cases that responded to antibiotic treatment. Thirty-two (94%) patients were stone free on postoperative day 2; significant residual stones (8 and 10 mm) were detected in two patients who underwent shockwave lithotripsy, and they became stone free within 10 days. CONCLUSION: Solo US-guided PCNL can be performed safely as an alternative to the fluoroscopy-guided PCNL for single stone pelvis in a moderately to markedly dilated PCS by an experienced urologist.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calices/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Calices/surgery , Kidney Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Pelvis/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...