Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Oncol ; 30(11): 9860-9871, 2023 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999136

ABSTRACT

Male breast cancer (BC) represents less than 1% of male tumors. Little is known about male BC characteristics, management, and survival, with many studies based on a small number of cases. Consequently, the treatment of male BC lacks specific guidelines. The aims of the study are to compare male and female breast cancer (FBC) in terms of cancer clinical and anatomopathological features and treatment approach, and to identify differences between male BC and FBC in terms of survival. Patients and methods: Data from 2006 to 2018 were retrospectively acquired. Amounts of 49 males and 680 postmenopausal females with primary non-metastatic BC who underwent breast surgery at Mauriziano Hospital or IRCCS Candiolo (TO-Italy) were included. The mean age at diagnosis for male BC was 68.6 years, and males presented a smaller tumor size than women (p < 0.05) at diagnosis. Most male BC patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) with tamoxifen (73.5%). AET drop-out rate due to side effects was 16.3% for males compared to 7.6% for women (p = 0.04). Comparing FBC and male BC, no differences have been identified in terms of DFS and OS, with a similar 10-year-relapse rate (12% male BC vs. 12.4% FBC). Propensity Score Matching by age, nodal status, pT, and molecular subtype had been performed and no differences in OS and DFS were seen between male BC and FBC. In conclusion, male BC and FBC have similar prognostic factors and survival outcomes. The drop-out rate of AET was higher in males, and side effects were the main reason for drug discontinuation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms, Male , Humans , Male , Female , Breast Neoplasms, Male/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms, Male/drug therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
2.
Carcinogenesis ; 44(10-11): 718-725, 2023 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793149

ABSTRACT

Cancer is a multi-factorial disease, and the etiology of breast cancer (BC) is due to a combination of both genetic and environmental factors. Breast tissue shows a unique microbiota, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes are the most abundant bacteria in breast tissue, and several studies have shown that the microbiota of healthy breast differs from that of BC. Breast microbiota appears to be correlated with different characteristics of the tumor, and prognostic clinicopathologic features. It also appears that there are subtle differences between the microbial profiles of the healthy control and high-risk patients. Genetic predisposition is an extremely important risk factor for BC. BRCA1/2 germline mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome are DNA repair deficiency syndromes inherited as autosomal dominant characters that substantially increase the risk of BC. These syndromes exhibit incomplete penetrance of BC expression in carrier subjects. The action of breast microbiota on carcinogenesis might explain why women with a mutation develop cancer and others do not. Among the potential biological pathways through which the breast microbiota may affect tumorigenesis, the most relevant appear to be DNA damage caused by colibactin and other bacterial-derived genotoxins, ß-glucuronidase-mediated estrogen deconjugation and reactivation, and HPV-mediated cancer susceptibility. In conclusion, in patients with a genetic predisposition, an unfavorable breast microbiota may be co-responsible for the onset of BC. Prospectively, the ability to modulate the microbiota may have an impact on disease onset and progression in patients at high risk for BC.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Germ-Line Mutation
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(9)2022 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35565357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to describe the surgical management of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with attention to the impact on surgical outcomes of a clip-based marking technique. METHODS: Patients who underwent NACT at the Breast Unit of the A. O Ordine Mauriziano of Turin from January 2018 and had a surgical intervention by January 2022 were included. Data on the feasibility of clip insertion, after-treatment visibility, and successful removal during surgery were collected prospectively. Surgical outcomes in terms of breast-conserving surgery and axillary dissection reduction were described. RESULTS: In 51 patients who had surgery after NACT, 55 clips were placed (34 breast and 21 axillary clips). Ultrasound visibility of the clips was optimal (91%) as well as preoperative localization and retrieval within the surgical specimen. Moreover, the use of the clip positively affected surgical outcomes. In our study, clip insertion allowed to avoid mastectomy and axillary dissection in patients with a complete radiological response. CONCLUSIONS: In our findings, the use of breast and/or lymph node clips has proved to be a simple and effective method to improve surgical conservative management of breast cancer patients after NACT.

4.
Breast Cancer ; 28(5): 1131-1140, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33939116

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Extension of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) reduces the risk of recurrence in women diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancers, but a significant benefit is unlikely to happen to all individual patients. This study is aimed at evaluating the ability of different clinical late distant recurrence (LDR) risk stratification methods and in particular the clinical treatment score at 5 years (CTS5) to predict the response to extended adjuvant ET. METHODS: 783 patients diagnosed with ER+ BC between 1988 and 2014 at Umberto I Hospital of Turin, of which 180 received an extended adjuvant ET, were retrospectively selected. They were stratified according to pT, pN, disease stage, tumor grade, Ki67 level, progesterone receptor status and CTS5. The primary endpoint was LDR rate. LDR rates according to ET duration were confronted in each subgroup. RESULT: The median duration of extended ET was 7 years (6-10). Median follow-up from diagnosis was 9 years (6-26). Retrospective risk stratification according to tumor size, nodal status, disease stage, tumor grade, Ki67 level, and progesterone receptor status did not appear to be able to predict the response to extended ET. In the CTS5 high-risk subgroup instead, the risk of developing an LDR was significantly lower in the patients who underwent extended ET compared to standard ET (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.91), while no significant benefit was demonstrated for low and intermediate-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification according to CTS5 appeared to be predictive of the response to extended endocrine therapy in our population of real-life pre and postmenopausal patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Risk Assessment/methods , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Tamoxifen/adverse effects
5.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 21(1): e53-e62, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) distant recurrences (DR) develop after the completion of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Its extension is beneficial on disease-free survival and overall survival but increases therapy-related side effects. Selecting patients who could benefit the most from an extended regimen has become an increasing need. Clinical Treatment Score at 5 Years (CTS5) is a prognostic tool using clinicopathologic data to estimate DR risk after 5 years of ET for ER+ BC. We sought to validate the prognostic value of CTS5 in a retrospective cohort of real-life pre- and postmenopausal patients diagnosed with ER+ BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTS5 was calculated for 603 patients diagnosed with ER+ BC at Umberto I Hospital of Turin and DR-free after 5 years of ET. Primary endpoint was late DR (LDR) rate. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8 years (range, 6-26 years). The 426 postmenopausal women were categorized by CTS5 as follows: 152 low risk, 139 intermediate risk, and 135 high risk. LDR rates were 3.9%, 7.2%, and 15.6%, respectively. CTS5 results were prognostic for LDR: patients with CTS5-high showed a fourfold risk of developing an LDR compared to patients with CTS5-low (hazard ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-11.1). The same analysis was conducted for the 177 premenopausal women: 88 low risk, 40 intermediate risk, and 49 high risk. LDR rate were 5.6%, 7.5%, and 20.4%, respectively, proving CTS5 to be prognostic for premenopausal patients as well (CTS5-high vs. CTS5-low: hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-11.0). CONCLUSION: CTS5 was shown to be prognostic of the risk of LDR in our population of real-life pre- and postmenopausal patients. Our results support its use in clinical practice to better tailor the prescription of extended ET.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Premenopause , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...