Performance of the Population Bioequivalence (PBE) Statistical Test Using an IPAC-RS Database of Delivered Dose from Metered Dose Inhalers.

This article reports performance characteristics of the population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical test recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orally inhaled products. A PBE Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) assembled and considered a database comprising delivered dose measurements from 856 individual batches across 20 metered dose inhaler products submitted by industry. A review of the industry dataset identified variability between batches and a systematic lifestage effect that was not included in the FDA-prescribed model for PBE. A simulation study was designed to understand PBE performance when factors identified in the industry database were present. Neglecting between-batch variability in the PBE model inflated errors in the equivalence conclusion: (i) The probability of incorrectly concluding equivalence (type I error) often exceeded 15% for non-zero between-batch variability, and (ii) the probability of incorrectly rejecting equivalence (type II error) for identical products approached 20% when product and between-batch variabilities were high. Neglecting a systematic through-life increase in the PBE model did not substantially impact PBE performance for the magnitude of lifestage effect considered. Extreme values were present in 80% of the industry products considered, with low-dose extremes having a larger impact on equivalence conclusions. The dataset did not support the need for log-transformation prior to analysis, as requested by FDA. Log-transformation resulted in equivalence conclusions that depended on the direction of product mean differences. These results highlight a need for further refinement of in vitro equivalence methodology.

Bronchodilator efficacy of extrafine glycopyrronium bromide: the Glyco 2 study.

An extrafine formulation of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide (GB) is in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in combination with beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol fumarate - a "fixed triple". This two-part study was randomized, double blind, placebo controlled in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: Part 1: single-dose escalation, GB 12.5, 25, 50, 100 or 200 µg versus placebo; Part 2: repeat-dose (7-day), four-period crossover, GB 12.5, 25 or 50 µg twice daily (BID) versus placebo, with an open-label extension in which all patients received tiotropium 18 µg once daily. On the morning of Day 8 in all five periods, patients also received formoterol 12 µg. In study Part 1, 27 patients were recruited. All GB doses significantly increased from baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) area under the curve (AUC0-12h) and peak FEV1, with a trend toward greater efficacy with higher GB dose. All adverse events were mild-moderate in severity, with a lower incidence with GB than placebo and no evidence of a dose-response relationship. In study Part 2, of 38 patients recruited, 34 completed the study. Adjusted mean differences from placebo in 12 h trough FEV1 on Day 7 (primary) were 115, 142 and 136 mL for GB 12.5, 25 and 50 µg BID, respectively (all P<0.001). GB 25 and 50 µg BID were superior (P<0.05) to GB 12.5 µg BID for pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 8. For this endpoint, GB 25 and 50 µg BID were also superior to tiotropium. Compared with Day 7, addition of formoterol significantly increased Day 8 FEV1 peak and AUC0-12h with all GB doses and placebo (all P<0.001). All adverse events were mild-moderate in severity and there was no indication of a dose-related relationship. This study provides initial evidence on bronchodilation, safety and pharmacokinetics of extrafine GB BID. Overall, the results suggest that GB 25 µg BID is the optimal dose in patients with COPD.

A Two-Period Open-Label, Single-Dose Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Drug-Drug Interaction Between Cimetidine and Inhaled Extrafine CHF 5993.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: CHF 5993 is an extrafine 'triple therapy' combination of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium bromide (GB), the long-acting ß2-agonist formoterol fumarate (FF), and the inhaled corticosteroid beclometasone dipropionate (BDP). It is in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma delivered via pressurised metered-dose inhaler. METHODS: This two-period, open-label, crossover study examined the drug-drug interaction of CHF 5993 and cimetidine. In one period, subjects received cimetidine 800 mg twice daily for 6 days; on the fourth day they also received CHF 5993 (BDP/FF/GB 400/24/100 µg). In the other, they received CHF 5993 alone. Primary objective was to compare the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) of GB, with and without cimetidine. Secondary endpoints included GB AUC0-12h, maximum concentration (C max), time to C max (t max), elimination half-life (t ½) and urinary excretion. Pharmacokinetic parameters of BDP, beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP; active metabolite of BDP) and formoterol were also evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were randomised; 25 completed. Co-administration of CHF 5993 and cimetidine resulted in small, statistically significant increases in GB AUC0-t, AUC0-12h and C max vs CHF 5993 (ratios 1.16, 1.21 and 1.26, respectively); t ½, t max and urinary excretion were unaffected. There were small, statistically significant increases in formoterol AUC0-t, AUC0-24h and t ½ following co-administration of cimetidine and CHF 5993; urinary excretion was unaffected. There were no significant differences for either BDP or B17MP. There were few adverse events (AEs), and no serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study indicates that there is no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction between CHF 5993 and cimetidine.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extrafine fixed pMDI combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate in adolescent asthma.

AIM: The aim was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an extrafine pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol fumarate (FF) in adolescent and adult asthma. METHODS: This was a three-way crossover study, on 30 asthmatic adolescents receiving BDP/FF pMDI with or without a valved holding chamber (VHC) or a free licenced combination of BDP pMDI and FF pMDI plus a parallel arm of 30 asthmatic adults receiving BDP/FF pMDI. All patients received a single dose of BDP and FF of 400 µg and 24 µg, for each treatment, respectively. Assessments were performed over 8 hours. RESULTS: In adolescents, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the systemic exposure (AUC(0,t)) geometric mean ratio of the fixed combination with or without VHC vs. the free combination were within the bioequivalence range 0.80-1.25, both for beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP, the active metabolite of BDP) and formoterol. Pharmacodynamic variables for plasma potassium and glucose, pulse rate and pulmonary function in adolescents were equivalent between treatments, 95% CI within 0.9, 1.09. The upper level of 90% CIs for AUC(0,t) geometric mean ratio adolescents : adults of B17MP and formoterol after treatment with BDP/FF pMDI was lower than 1.25, 90% CI 0.78, 1.04 and 0.86, 1.17, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In adolescents the pharmacodynamics and the overall systemic exposure to the active ingredients of an extrafine fixed combination of BDP/FF pMDI with or without a VHC was equivalent to that of a free licenced combination of pMDIs of established safety and efficacy profiles. The systemic exposure in adolescents was not higher than in adults. These results support the indication for use of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting ß2 -adrenoceptor agonist pMDIs in adolescents at the same dosage as in adults.

The systemic exposure to inhaled beclometasone/formoterol pMDI with valved holding chamber is independent of age and body size.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend prescription of inhaled corticosteroids at a reduced dosage in children compared to older patients in order to minimize the systemic exposure and risk of unwanted side effects. In children, pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDI) are recommended in combination with a valved holding chamber (VHC) to overcome the problem of coordinating inhalation with actuation. However, the influence of age and body size on the systemic exposure of drugs to be administered via a pMDI with VHC is still not fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to compare the systemic exposure to the active ingredients of a fixed combination of beclometasone-dipropionate/formoterol-fumarate administered via pMDI with VHC in children, adolescents and adults. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of formoterol and beclometasone-17-monopropionate (active metabolite of beclometasone-dipropionate) was evaluated over 8 h from three studies, each performed in a different age and body size group. Children (7-11 years, n = 20), adolescents (12-17 years, n = 29) and adults (≥18 years, n = 24) received a single dose of beclometasone/formoterol (children: 200 µg/24 µg, adolescents and adults: 400 µg/24 µg) via pMDI with AeroChamber Plus™. RESULTS: The systemic exposure in children in comparison to adolescents was equivalent for formoterol while it was halved for beclometasone-17-monopropionate in accordance with the halved dose of beclometasone administered in children (90% CIs within 0.8-1.25 for formoterol and 0.4-0.625 for beclometasone-17-monopropionate). The systemic exposure to beclometasone-17-monopropionate and formoterol was equivalent between adolescents and adults. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic exposure to the active ingredients of a fixed dose combination of beclometasone/formoterol administered via pMDI with AeroChamber Plus™ correlates with the nominal dose independently of patient age and body size. Thus, dose reduction in relation to age when using a pMDI with VHC may be unnecessary for reducing the systemic exposure in children.

Pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of tobramycin nebuliser solution 300 mg/4 ml administered by PARI eFlow(®) rapid and PARI LC Plus(®) nebulisers in cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Tobramycin nebuliser solution (TNS) is indicated for maintenance therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections. Adherence to recommended therapy in CF has always been a challenge and new generation nebulisers are increasingly used "off label" to reduce the time required for inhalation, potentially improving patient compliance. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multi-centre, two-period crossover study, 27 CF patients with PA infection received TNS 300 mg/4 mL (TNS4) via the PARI eFlow(®) rapid or PARI LC Plus(®) nebuliser twice daily for 28 days in two study periods separated by a 4-week washout. The pharmacokinetic profile in plasma and sputum were determined after single and multiple dose administration on Day 1 and Day 28, respectively. Nebulisation times and general safety and tolerability profiles were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: Plasma tobramycin pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for the eFlow and LC Plus nebulisers both on Day 1 and Day 28. After multiple dose administration for 28 days, the eFlow/LC Plus ratio of geometric means for plasma C(max) and AUC(0-t), were 85.32 (90% CI, 61.24-118.86) and 87.44 (90% CI, 64.87-117.87), respectively. Despite the high variability, sputum tobramycin C(max) and AUC(0-t) for the eFlow on Day 28 tended to be higher than for the LC Plus (90% CI for the ratio, 86.11-226.45 and 81.81-236.71), respectively. Nebulisation times were significantly shorter for the eFlow with a median time for nebulisation of 5 min in comparison to 13 min for the LC Plus. Safety data confirmed a favourable safety profile for TNS4, with the majority of the findings being related to the underlying CF disease. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma and sputum pharmacokinetic data in CF patients with chronic PA infection support comparable pulmonary delivery and safety of TNS4 administered using different nebulisers, with a significantly shorter nebulisation time for the eFlow.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of inhaled fixed combination vs. the free combination of beclomethasone and formoterol pMDIs in asthmatic children.

AIM: The fixed combination of beclomethasone (BDP) and formoterol pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) (Foster®, Chiesi Farmaceutici) is being developed in the lower strength (BDP/formoterol: 50/6 µg) to provide an appropriate dosage for children with asthma. The aim of this work was to investigate the systemic bioavailability of beclomethasone-17-monoproprionate (B17MP, the active metabolite of BDP) and formoterol after single inhalation of Foster® pMDI 50/6 µg vs. the free combination of BDP and formoterol pMDIs in asthmatic children. METHODS: Children aged 5-11 years old inhaled BDP 200 µg and formoterol 24 µg as fixed vs. free combination in an open label, randomized, two way crossover single dose study. Blood was collected pre-dose up to 8 h post-dose for pharmacokinetic evaluation (AUC(0,t), AUC(0,∞), AUC(0,0.5 h, Cmax , tmax , t1/2 ). Pharmacodynamics included heart rate, plasma potassium, urinary glucose and cortisol excretion. Peak expiratory flow and adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty subjects were evaluable. The systemic exposure of B17MP and formoterol administered as fixed combination did not exceed the free combination: B17MP AUC(0,t) (pg ml(-1) h) ratio test : reference (90% CI), 0.81 (0.697, 0.948) and formoterol AUC(0,t) (pg ml(-1) h) ratio test : reference 0.97 (0.85, 1.10). All pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points showed non-superiority in favour of the test drug. One adverse event (vertigo) occurred but was not considered treatment-related. CONCLUSION: BDP and formoterol pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects are non-superior after administration of the two actives as fixed vs. the free combination in 5-11-year-old asthmatic children.

Rapid effects of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination inhaler on airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction in asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of a recent fixed combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F) were investigated using non-invasive markers of inflammation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) provocative challenge. The aim was to assess the onset of the anti-inflammatory action of low and high doses and evaluate the suitability of non-invasive assessments to demonstrate dose response. METHODS: Steroid naïve adult out-patients with mild asthma, sensitive to AMP with baseline exhaled NO > 25 parts per billion entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way, cross-over study. Patients were randomised to low dose (1 actuation) or high dose (4 actuations) extrafine BDP/F 100/6 µg, or placebo administered twice daily on Days 1 and 2 and once in the morning on Day 3 of each period. Exhaled NO was measured pre-dose on Day 1, then 2 and 4 hours post-administration on Day 3. The AMP challenge was performed 4 hours post-administration on Day 3 and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, L) was measured from 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1. Endpoints were NO at 2 and 4 hours, AMP challenge at 4 hours after the fifth dose on Day 3 and FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 h post-dose on Day 1. Analysis of covariance was performed for NO and FEV1 and analysis of variance for AMP challenge. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were randomised and completed the study. Exhaled NO was significantly lower for both doses of extrafine BDP/F versus placebo at 2 and 4 hours (high dose LS mean difference: -22.5 ppb, p < 0.0001 and -20.5 ppb, p < 0.0001; low dose: -14.1 ppb, p = 0.0006 and -12.1 ppb, p = 0.0043) with a significant dose response (p = 0.0342 and p = 0.0423). Likewise, AMP challenge revealed statistically significant differences between both doses of extrafine BDP/F and placebo (high dose LS mean difference: 4.8 mg/mL, p < 0.0001; low dose: 3.7 mg/mL, p < 0.0001), and a significant dose response (p = 0.0185). FEV1 was significantly improved versus placebo for both doses (high dose LS mean difference: 0.2 L, p = 0.0001; low dose: 0.2 L p = 0.0001), but without a significant dose response. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed combination inhaler of extrafine BDP/F has early dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects with a rapid onset of bronchodilatation in mild asthmatic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01343745.

Effect of AeroChamber Plus™ on the lung and systemic bioavailability of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol pMDI.

AIM: To assess the effect of AeroChamber Plus™ on lung deposition and systemic exposure to extra-fine beclometasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol (100/6 µg) pMDI (Foster®). The lung deposition of the components of the combination given with the pMDI was also evaluated using the charcoal block technique. METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers received four inhalations of extra-fine BDP/formoterol (100/6 µg) using (i) pMDI alone, (ii) pMDI and AeroChamber Plus™ and (iii) pMDI and charcoal ingestion. RESULTS: Compared with pMDI alone, use of AeroChamber Plus™ increased the peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) of BDP (2822.3 ± 1449.9 vs. 5454.9 ± 3197.1 pg ml(-1)), its active metabolite beclometasone 17-monopropionate (17-BMP) (771.6 ± 288.7 vs. 1138.9 ± 495.6 pg ml(-1)) and formoterol (38.4 ± 17.8 vs. 54.7 ± 20.0 pg ml(-1)). For 17-BMP and formoterol, the AUC(0,30 min), indicative of lung deposition, was increased in the AeroChamber Plus™ group by 41% and 45%, respectively. This increase was mainly observed in subjects with inadequate inhalation technique. However, use of AeroChamber Plus™ did not increase the total systemic exposure to 17-BMP and formoterol. Results after ingestion of charcoal confirmed that AUC(0,30 min) can be taken as an index of lung bioavailability and that more than 30% of the inhaled dose of extra-fine BDP/formoterol 100/6 µg was delivered to the lung using the pMDI alone. CONCLUSIONS: The use of AeroChamber Plus™ optimizes the delivery of BDP and formoterol to the lung in subjects with inadequate inhalation technique. The total systemic exposure was not increased, supporting the safety of extra-fine BDP/formoterol pMDI with AeroChamber Plus™.

Lung deposition of BDP/formoterol HFA pMDI in healthy volunteers, asthmatic, and COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: When inhaling medication, it is essential that drug particles are delivered to all sites of lung inflammation, including the peripheral airways. The aim of this study was to assess the lung deposition and lung distribution of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol (100/6 microg), both dissolved in hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) in healthy subjects, asthmatic, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, to investigate how the in vitro characteristics of the formulation translate into the in vivo performance in diseases with different airway obstruction. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 8), persistent asthmatics (n = 8), and patients with stable COPD (n = 8) completed this open-label, single-dose parallel-group study. Each patient received one single treatment of four puffs of (99 m)Tc-labeled BDP/formoterol formulation. The correlation between particle size distribution of radioactivity and of the drugs in the radiolabeled formulation was validated. Intra- and extrapulmonary deposition, amount of exhaled drug, and the central to peripheral ratio (C/P) were calculated immediately after inhalation. Patients' lung function and pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed up to 24 h post-dose. RESULTS: The average lung deposition of BDP/formoterol was 34.08 +/- 9.30% (relative to nominal dose) in healthy subjects, 30.86 +/- 8.89% in asthmatics, and 33.10 +/- 8.90% in COPD patients. Extrathoracic deposition was 53.48% +/- 8.95, 57.64% +/- 9.92 and 54.98% +/- 7.01, respectively. C/P ratios of 1.42 +/- 0.32 in healthy subjects, 1.96 +/- 0.43 in asthmatics, and 1.94 +/- 0.69 for COPD patients confirmed drug distribution to all regions of the lungs. Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) increased in all groups after BDP/formoterol inhalation, but was more evident in the patient groups. No significant correlation between baseline lung function and drug deposition was observed. Formoterol, BDP, and beclomethasone 17 monopropionate (B17MP) plasma profiles were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of BDP/formoterol HFA (100/6 microg) produces high and homogeneous deposition of BDP and formoterol in the airways, regardless of pathophysiological condition.

Systemic exposure and implications for lung deposition with an extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Foster is a fixed combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F). It is formulated as an extra-fine solution and delivered via a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant. The aims of this study were to compare the systemic exposure to BDP, to its active metabolite beclometasone-17-monopropionate (B17MP) and to formoterol after administration of BDP/F versus separate administration of a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation of BDP and formoterol HFA, and to explore a possible relationship between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings. METHODS: In this open-label, crossover, placebo-controlled study, 12 healthy male subjects received a single dose of BDP/F 400 microg/24 microg (four inhalations of Foster BDP/F 100 microg/6 microg), single doses of BDP CFC 1000 microg (four inhalations of Becotide Forte 250 microg) plus formoterol 24 microg (four inhalations of Atimos 6 microg) via separate MDIs, or placebo. Continuous pharmacokinetic variables for BDP, B17MP, formoterol, cortisol and potassium were evaluated. Cardiovascular effects, peak flow measurements and tolerability were also examined. RESULTS: Exposure to BDP was not significantly different between active treatment arms, but lower systemic exposure to B17MP was observed with the fixed combination than with the separate components (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC] from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)] 5280 vs 8120 pg.h/mL; p = 0.001). Despite a lower total systemic exposure to B17MP with the fixed combination, B17MP plasma concentrations during the first 30 minutes after administration, indicative of pulmonary absorption, were 86% higher with BDP/F than with the separate components (AUC from 0 to 30 minutes [AUC(30 min)] 353 vs 190 pg x h/mL; p = 0.003). Twenty-four-hour serum cortisol concentrations were significantly higher with BDP/F than with BDP and formoterol administered separately (2.26 vs 1.90 microg x h/mL; p < 0.01). No significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of formoterol and no clinically relevant differences in serum potassium and cardiovascular or spirometric parameters were observed between the treatments. Both active treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These pharmacokinetic data show that with a BDP dose from Foster that is 2.5 times less than a BDP dose from Becotide Forte, pulmonary absorption is 86% higher; however, systemic exposure is 35% lower, resulting in less cortisol suppression for a similar BDP dosage.

Tolerability of high cumulative doses of the HFA modulite beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol combination inhaler in asthmatic patients.

The corticosteroid beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been formulated with the long acting beta agonist formoterol (BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg, Foster) in a single inhaler using Modulite technology. We have investigated the acute tolerability of high, cumulative doses of BDP/formoterol compared to formoterol alone and placebo. This was a double blind, 3-way cross-over comparison of 10 puffs of BDP/formoterol 100 microg/6 microg or formoterol 6 microg or placebo during maintenance treatment with BDP/formoterol two puffs per day. Pharmacokinetics over 12h during maintenance treatment was measured on day 7. High cumulative doses were then administered on three separated days. Eighteen patients with asthma were recruited (mean FEV(1) 65% predicted). The primary endpoint was serum potassium over the 12h period after high doses. QTc, blood pressure and heart rate over 12h, and plasma lactate and glucose over 3h following dosing were assessed. Formoterol caused a significantly greater decrease in serum potassium than BDP/formoterol or placebo (difference in mean minimum concentrations; 0.11 and -0.15 mmol/l, respectively, p<0.05 for both comparisons). No significant differences in serum potassium parameters were found between BDP/formoterol and placebo. QTc, plasma lactate and vital signs values observed with the combination were not statistically different from those with formoterol alone. For glucose, the mean maximum increase after formoterol treatment was 0.4 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to placebo), while BDP/formoterol treatment caused a maximum increase of 0.7 mmol/l (p<0.01 compared to formoterol and placebo). The active metabolite of BDP is beclomethasone-17-monopropriate (B17MP), which reached Cmax at 0.25 h, with an elimination half-life of 3.7 h. Formoterol also reached Cmax at 0.25 h, and concentrations were measurable up to 12 h. High doses of BDP/formoterol did not significantly reduce serum potassium, while formoterol alone did to a greater extent. The BDP/formoterol combination was well tolerated, and exhibited a safety profile generally similar to formoterol alone when administered in high doses to stable asthmatic patients.

Lung deposition of formoterol HFA (Atimos/Forair) in healthy volunteers, asthmatic and COPD patients.

In this study, the influence of lung function on lung deposition of a radioactively labeled Formotoerol HFA MDI (Forair) was investigated. Eighteen subjects were measured: 6 healthy subjects (FEV(1) = 107% pred), 6 patients with Asthma (FEV(1) = 72% pred), and 6 patients with COPD (FEV(1) = 40% pred). The lung deposition of the radioactive-labeled drug was measured with a gamma camera. The lung deposition relative to the emitted dose was 31% for healthy subjects, 34% for asthmatics, and 35% for COPD patients. These data suggest a comparable lung deposition in the different populations. There was no significant correlation between lung function (FEV(1)) and lung deposition. The extrathoracic deposition was around 50%. The finding were that lung deposition of the inhaled Formoterol did not depend on lung function and the relative high values of lung deposition can be explained by the small particle size (0.8 microm) of the HFA-Formoterol-Formulation and the slow inhalation (30 L/min flow) used in this study. It can be concluded, that with this modern HFA drug formulation, the deposition is high, even in obstructed lungs.

Clinical pharmacology study of Bramitob, a tobramycin solution for nebulization, in comparison with Tobi.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare in vitro characteristics and pharmacokinetics of Bramitob, a preservative-free tobramycin solution for nebulization, and Tobi in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. METHODS: In vitro characteristics of Bramitob and Tobi were evaluated using Pari TurboBoy/LC Plus and the Systam 290 LS nebulizers. In the randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study, 11 patients with CF received a single nebulized dose (300mg) of Bramitob or Tobi, separated by a 7-day washout period. Plasma and sputum tobramycin concentrations were measured immediately before and over 24 hours after administration. RESULTS: Bramitob and Tobi performed alike during nebulization. The fine particle fraction was 33-37% and the mass median aerodynamic diameter was <5microm. Nine patients completed the pharmacokinetic study. Tobramycin plasma profiles after administration of Bramitob or Tobi were similar, with a peak at 90 and 72 minutes after inhalation of Bramitob and Tobi, respectively. The elimination half-life was ~5 hours for both products. The relative bioavailability of Bramitob to Tobi was 1.01, indicating comparable systemic exposure. Peak sputum concentration of tobramycin was 816 +/- 681 microg/g for Tobi and 1289 +/- 851 microg/g for Bramitob and was >400 microg/g (threshold sufficient for an antibacterial effect against P. aeruginosa) in 5 out of 9 patients receiving Tobi and 8 out of 9 patients receiving Bramitob. All adverse events were considered mild and judged not related to the study drugs. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro performance of Bramitob((R)) was similar when nebulized with Pari TurboBoy k/LC Plus and Systam 290 LS nebulizers and comparable to that of TobiThe systemic bioavailability of tobramycin was similar after administration of either Bramitob or Tobi; however, in sputum samples the tobramycin peak concentration was slightly greater after administration of Bramitob than after Tobi.

A tolerability and pharmacokinetic study of a new injectable formulation of disodium clodronate in healthy female volunteers.

Disodium clodronate (dichloromethylene bisphosphonic acid, disodium salt; CAS 22560-50-5) is a bisphosphonate that has demonstrated efficacy in patients with a variety of diseases of enhanced bone resorption. Intramuscular clodronate can determine pain at the injection site, it is therefore particularly useful to co-administer a local anaesthetic with clodronate to reduce pain at the injection site. The tolerability and pharmacokinetic of a new formulation of 100 mg disodium clodronate containing 1% lidocaine (test formulation, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A) were investigated in comparison to the same formulation without the local anaesthetic (Clody) and a marketed formulation containing 1% benzyl alcohol (Clasteon). Thirty healthy female volunteers were treated according to a single dose, double-blind, randomised, three-way cross-over design. The local tolerability was investigated by assessing reddening and hardening at the injection site, and plasma CPK levels. Pain intensity was investigated on the VAS (visual analogue scale) and on the VRS (verbal rating score). Urinary clodronic acid concentrations were determined using a validated specific GC/MS/NCI assay. The statistical analysis on pain assessment showed a significant reduction of pain intensity immediately and up to 2 hours after administration of the new formulation compared to the marketed ones. CPK levels and occurrence of hardening at the injection site did not show statistically significant differences between formulations. No local redness was reported. Clodronate urinary excretion during the 48 h collection interval was not statistically different among the formulations and the 95% confidence intervals were inside the bioequivalence acceptance region, demonstrating comparable bioavailability. It was concluded that the investigated new formulation of 100 mg disodium clodronate was better tolerated than the reference marketed formulations.

Single oral dose pharmacokinetic interaction study of manidipine and delapril in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess potential pharmacokinetic interactions between delapril, an angiotensin conversion enzyme inhibitor, and manidipine, a calcium channel antagonist, prior to the development of a fixed combination drug product. METHODS: Eighteen healthy male volunteers received a single oral dose of 10 mg manidipine dihydrochloride (CAS 89226-75-5), or 30 mg delapril hydrochloride (CAS 83435-67-0), or both simultaneously, according to a fully balanced three-way cross-over design. The three treatments were separated by a one-week washout period. Blood samples were collected during 24 h for plasma determination of manidipine and metabolite M-XIII and/or of delapril and metabolites M1, M2 and M3, using specific LCMS/MS methods. RESULTS: The bioavailability of manidipine and M-XIII was slightly decreased by concomitant administration of delapril (manidipine: Cmax-19% and AUC infinity-11% M-XIII: Cmax-17% and AUCt-18%). The bioavailability of delapril was not influenced by co-administration with manidipine (Cmax-7% and AUC infinity +4%). The effect on delapril pharmacologically active metabolites M1 and M3 was negligible. The inactive metabolite M2 underwent a 13% reduction of Cmax and AUC infinity. The 90% confidence intervals were confined within limits of acceptance (70-143% for Cmax and 80-125% for AUC). Mean residence times and apparent elimination half-lives were unaltered. Blood pressure and heart rate versus time profiles were similar during the three treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous oral administration of 10 mg manidipine and 30 mg delapril does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either drug or that of their principal metabolites.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a new manidipine and delapril fixed oral combination in young and elderly subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of a fixed combination tablet containing 10 mg of manidipine dihydrochloride (CAS 89226-75-5), a calcium channel antagonist, and 30 mg of delapril hydrochloride (CAS 83435-67-0), an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, during once daily repeated dosing in young and elderly subjects and to assess the bioequivalence of the fixed combination tablet and the single ingredient tablets taken simultaneously in young healthy subjects after a single dose administration. METHODS: Eighteen young healthy male volunteers received a single oral dose of 10 mg manidipine and 30 mg delapril as two separate tablets or a fixed combination tablet, followed by a week of once daily dosing with the fixed combination. Eight male and eight female elderly volunteers also received a week of once daily dosing with the fixed combination. Blood samples were collected during 24 h on the first and last treatment day for plasma determination of manidipine, delapril and their main metabolites, using specific LC-MS/MS methods. Blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded during 24 h. RESULTS: Bioequivalence was strictly demonstrated between the extemporaneous and the fixed combination tablet after single dose administration. At steady-state in young subjects, manidipine AUC and Cmax were lower (-8 and -12%) and t1/2 was longer (+45%), while delapril and metabolites were little affected as compared to single dose. In elderly subjects, manidipine Cmax was 4% lower than after single dose, AUC was 13% higher, and t1/2 was increased 2.4-fold. For delapril and active metabolites, Cmax and AUC increased modestly. Blood pressure and heart rate versus time profiles after single dose and at steady-state were almost superimposable. In elderly compared to young subjects at steady-state, peak concentrations of manidipine and delapril changed by +35% and -15% while AUCs increased by +70% and +9.7%. CONCLUSION: The fixed combination tablet of 10 mg manidipine and 30 mg delapril is bioequivalent to mono-ingredient tablets. At steady-state, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in young and elderly subjects undergo minor changes and indicate negligible accumulation. Drug exposure is higher in elderly subjects.

Characterization of Ganstigmine metabolites in hepatocytes by low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography.

In order to deepen the understanding of the metabolism of Ganstigmine, a new acetylcholinesterase inhibitor under evaluation for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, samples obtained by incubating the drug with female rat hepatocytes were investigated by low-resolution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). The results confirmed the formation of most of the phase I metabolites already demonstrated, but also three new species. The combination of high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) LC/MS and LC/MS/MS measurements, and the evaluation of the more reasonable metabolic routes, allowed the identification of the new metabolites as Geneseroline-glucuronide and oxidized and rearranged Ganstigmine. Analogous investigations were made using hepatocytes from male rat and dog, and both gender monkeys and humans, to compare the metabolic patterns. The results did not indicate substantial differences in terms of numbers and abundances of detected metabolites among the considered species, and also between male and female hepatocytes within each species.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new controlled-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate 60 mg scored tablet (Monoket Multitab).

The influences of food, tablet splitting, and fractional dosing on the pharmacokinetics of a new controlled-release double-scored tablet containing 60 mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Monoket Multitab) were investigated in healthy male volunteers. Food interaction was evaluated after single dose administration under fasted conditions and after a standard high-fat breakfast. The effect of tablet splitting was assessed at steady-state, after 5 days of once daily dosing with the tablet taken intact or trisected. The influence of fractional dosing was assessed after 1 and 6 days of daily regimen of 40 mg in the morning (2/3 of a tablet) and 20 mg in the evening (1/3 of a tablet). The pharmacokinetics of isosorbide-5-mononitrate after taking the tablet intact or in three fragments were very similar with a mere 10% increase of maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for the latter, while the time to peak (T(max)) decreased from 5 to 4 h and areas under the concentration vs. time curves (AUCs) were virtually unchanged. Morning trough concentration reached 53 and 46 ng/ml, respectively. Administration of the intact tablet after a high-fat breakfast increased C(max) by 18% and AUC by 21%, and slightly delayed T(max) from 5 to 6h. During fractional dosing, morning and evening C(max) reached 364 and 315 ng/ml on the first day, and 373 and 300 ng/ml on the 6th day, respectively. The ratio of AUC(0-24 h) on the last day to AUC(infinity) on the first day, was 82.1% (confidence limits 71.7-94.1%) possibly resulting from peripheral volume expansion. The release characteristics of Monoket Multitab are thus moderately influenced by concomitant intake of food and to a very minor extent by tablet breaking. Fractional dosing allows to achieve lower peak and higher morning trough levels, while total exposure is comparable to that during once daily dosing (AUC(0-24 h, s.s.) of 5.55+/-1.78 and 5.71+/-1.08 microg h/ml).