Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. esp. cir. ortop. traumatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 64(2): 125-129, mar.-abr. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-196241

ABSTRACT

El tratamiento retentivo de material protésico sobreinfectado por gérmenes resistentes es un desafío, especialmente cuando el agente causal es Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina. Presentamos el manejo conservador satisfactorio de material de osteosíntesis implantado por fractura de tobillo a un paciente añoso y que sufrió sobreinfección por el citado microorganismo, en el que el tratamiento antimicrobiano consistió en la combinación de antibioterapia sistémica guiada por antibiograma (tras un primer ciclo empírico ineficaz), junto a irrigaciones tópicas de sevoflurano, aplicación de crema de sulfadiazina de plata y posteriormente cobertura del defecto cutáneo con terapia de presión negativa. Destacamos el novedoso papel del sevoflurano como analgésico y como antimicrobiano tópico (sumado a la crema de sulfadiazina de plata) en la evolución favorable de la herida, especialmente en el período en el que la antibioterapia empírica era ineficaz y todavía no se había comenzado con terapia de presión negativa


Retentive treatment of prosthetic material superinfected by resistant microorganisms is a challenge, especially when the causative agent is a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We present the successful conservative management of osteosynthesis material implanted due to ankle fracture in an elderly patient who suffered superinfection by the aforementioned microorganism, in which the antimicrobial treatment consisted of the combination of antibiotic-guided systemic antibiotics (after a first ineffective empirical cycle), together with topical irrigations of sevoflurane, applications of silver sulfadiazine cream, and subsequently coverage of the skin defect with negative pressure therapy. We highlight the novel role of sevoflurane as an analgesic and as a topical antimicrobial agent (in addition to silver sulfadiazine) in the favourable evolution of the wound, especially in the period in which the empirical antibiotic therapy was ineffective and negative pressure therapy had not yet been applied


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Superinfection/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Bone Plates/microbiology , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Superinfection/diagnosis , Superinfection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
2.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31892471

ABSTRACT

Retentive treatment of prosthetic material superinfected by resistant microorganisms is a challenge, especially when the causative agent is a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We present the successful conservative management of osteosynthesis material implanted due to ankle fracture in an elderly patient who suffered superinfection by the aforementioned microorganism, in which the antimicrobial treatment consisted of the combination of antibiotic-guided systemic antibiotics (after a first ineffective empirical cycle), together with topical irrigations of sevoflurane, applications of silver sulfadiazine cream, and subsequently coverage of the skin defect with negative pressure therapy. We highlight the novel role of sevoflurane as an analgesic and as a topical antimicrobial agent (in addition to silver sulfadiazine) in the favourable evolution of the wound, especially in the period in which the empirical antibiotic therapy was ineffective and negative pressure therapy had not yet been applied.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates/adverse effects , Conservative Treatment/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Superinfection/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates/microbiology , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Superinfection/diagnosis , Superinfection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...