Physical activity improves health-related quality of life, 6MWT, and VO2 peak before and during COVID-19 in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis / La actividad física mejora la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, el 6MWT y el pico de VO2 antes y durante la COVID-19 en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca: un metanálisis

Objective To compare the effects of physical activity on improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL), six minutes walking test (6MWT), and oxygen consumption (VO2) peak before and during Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with heart failure. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for relevant articles from five databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro, Cochrane, and additional resources. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institution (JBI). RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. Result Fifteen randomized controlled trial studies met the criteria. Analysis of the subgroup before COVID-19 showed that PA had a significant effect on HRQOL, as measured by MLHFQ (SDM: −0.27, 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.07, n=590), KCCQ (SDM: 2.10, 95% CI: 0.74 to 3.46, n=53), 6MWT (SMD: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.80 to 2.46, n=284), and VO2 peak (SMD: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.00 to 1.93, n=106). Analysis of the subgroup during COVID-19 showed that PA resulted in a significant effect on HRQOL, MLHFQ (SDM: −0.62, 95% CI: −1.32 to 0.09, n=221), KCCQ (SDM: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.50, n=486), 6MWT (SMD: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.73, n=493), and VO2 peak (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.60, n=325). Conclusion The PA could increase HRQOL, 6MWT, and VO2 peak before and during COVID-19, and therefore should be considered as part of daily activities for patients with HF (AU)

Objetivo Comparar los efectos de la actividad física en la mejora de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS), el 6MWT y el pico de VO2 antes y durante la COVID-19 en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. Métodos Siguiendo las pautas PRISMA, buscamos artículos relevantes en 5 bases de datos, incluidas Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro y Cochrane, así como recursos adicionales. Para evaluar la calidad del estudio se utilizó el Instituto Joanna Briggs, y el software RevMan 5.3 para realizar el metanálisis. Resultado Quince artículos de ensayos controlados aleatorizados cumplieron con los criterios. El análisis del subgrupo antes de la COVID-19 mostró que la actividad física tuvo un efecto significativo en la CVRS, según lo medido por el MLHFQ (DE: −0,27, IC 95%: −0,47 a −0,07, n=590), el KCCQ (DE: 2,10, IC 95%: 0,74 a 3,46, n=53), el 6MWT (DE: 1,63, IC 95%: 0,80 a 2,46, n=284) y el pico de VO2 (DE: 0,97, IC 95%: 0,00 a 1,93, n=106). El análisis del subgrupo durante la COVID-19 mostró que la actividad física tuvo un efecto significativo en la CVRS, el MLHFQ (DE: −0,66, IC 95%: −1,32 a 0,09, n=221), el KCCQ (DE: 0,33, IC 95%: 0,15 a 0,50, n=486), el 6MWT (DE: 0,47, IC 95%: 0,22 a 0,73, n=493) y el pico de VO2 (DE: 0,35, IC 95%: 0,10 a 0,60, n=325). Conclusión La actividad física podría aumentar la CVRS, el 6MWT y el pico de VO2 antes y durante la COVID-19, por lo que debe ser considerada como parte de las actividades diarias de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca (AU)

Physical activity improves health-related quality of life, 6MWT, and VO2 peak before and during COVID-19 in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of physical activity on improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL), six minutes walking test (6MWT), and oxygen consumption (VO2) peak before and during Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with heart failure. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for relevant articles from five databases, including Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PEDro, Cochrane, and additional resources. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institution (JBI). RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULT: Fifteen randomized controlled trial studies met the criteria. Analysis of the subgroup before COVID-19 showed that PA had a significant effect on HRQOL, as measured by MLHFQ (SDM: -0.27, 95% CI: -0.47 to -0.07, n=590), KCCQ (SDM: 2.10, 95% CI: 0.74 to 3.46, n=53), 6MWT (SMD: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.80 to 2.46, n=284), and VO2 peak (SMD: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.00 to 1.93, n=106). Analysis of the subgroup during COVID-19 showed that PA resulted in a significant effect on HRQOL, MLHFQ (SDM: -0.62, 95% CI: -1.32 to 0.09, n=221), KCCQ (SDM: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.50, n=486), 6MWT (SMD: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.73, n=493), and VO2 peak (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.60, n=325). CONCLUSION: The PA could increase HRQOL, 6MWT, and VO2 peak before and during COVID-19, and therefore should be considered as part of daily activities for patients with HF.