National estimates of mental health insurance benefits.

This article presents estimates of the proportion of the U.S. population that had mental health benefits in 1999, of the extent of their coverage, and of the proportion that were enrolled in health plans subject to the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (MHPA). Findings indicate that over three-quarters (76%) of the U.S. population had mental health benefits as part of their health insurance. Approximately 18% of the population had no mental health benefits, and for the remaining 6%, mental health benefits could not be determined. Of the 18% with no mental health benefits, most (84%) had no health insurance whatsoever, while the remainder (16%) had health insurance that did not cover mental health benefits. Estimates of the generosity of coverage indicate that 44% of the population had benefits that included prescription drugs, and that provided at least 30 inpatient days and 20 outpatient visits for psychiatric care. For 12% of the population, benefit generosity could not be determined. Finally, study results suggest that the MHPA affected only 42% of the U.S. population.

The salience of choice for Medicare beneficiaries.

The MedicareChoice program was created to expand choice and encourage beneficiaries to more actively consider the choices they have. This article assesses how "salient" choice is to Medicare beneficiaries. More than half of all Medicare beneficiaries in 2000 reported that they either have never considered their options to join a Medicare HMO or get supplemental coverage (44 percent) or did so last when they first became Medicare eligible (14 percent). Overall, 14 percent of Medicare beneficiaries found choice salient in 2000. Those new to Medicare or forced to switch because their plan left the program were more likely to consider choice, as expected. The multi-variate analysis shows that existing HMO enrollment is most strongly associated with salience of choice and also that this effect operates especially in the individual market. The findings of this research are consistent with the literature in highlighting the limited salience of choice to Medicare beneficiaries and the even more limited extent of actual switching that occurs in that market. There is little reason to believe that choice is more salient now than when the study was done. Policymakers who seek to encourage market-based solutions confront a dilemma: How to create incentives for a choice that most beneficiaries do not find particularly salient.