Clinical and Pregnancy Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Hospitalized Pregnant Women in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be at greater risk of poor maternal and pregnancy outcomes. This retrospective analysis reports clinical and pregnancy outcomes among hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-19 in the United States. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database-Special Release was used to examine the impact of COVID-19 among pregnant women aged 15-44 years who were hospitalized and who delivered compared with pregnant women without COVID-19. Outcomes evaluated were COVID-19 clinical progression, including the use of supplemental oxygen therapy, intensive care unit admission, critical illness, receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, maternal death, and pregnancy outcomes, including preterm delivery and stillbirth. RESULTS: Overall, 473 902 hospitalized pregnant women were included, 8584 (1.8%) of whom had a COVID-19 diagnosis (mean age = 28.4 [standard deviation = 6.1] years; 40% Hispanic). The risk of poor clinical and pregnancy outcomes was greater among pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with pregnant women without a COVID-19 diagnosis in 2020; the risk of poor clinical and pregnancy outcomes increased with increasing age. Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic women were consistently observed to have the highest relative risk of experiencing poor clinical or pregnancy outcomes across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, COVID-19 had a significant negative impact on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. These data help inform clinical practice and counseling to pregnant women regarding the risks of COVID-19. Clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pregnant women are urgently needed.

Severe maternal morbidity and mortality during delivery hospitalization of class I, II, III, and super obese women.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show that obesity predisposes patients to higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Data on the relationship between increasing degrees of obesity and risks of severe maternal morbidity, including mortality, are limited. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association of increasing classes of obesity, especially super obesity, with the risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality at the time of delivery hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: Using New York City linked birth certificates and hospital discharge data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. This study identified delivery hospitalizations for singleton, live births in 2008-2012. Women were classified as having obesity (class I, II, III, or super obesity), as opposed to normal weight or overweight, based on prepregnancy body mass index. Cases of severe maternal morbidity were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between obesity classes and severe maternal morbidity, adjusting for maternal sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: During 2008-2012, there were 570,997 live singleton births with available information on prepregnancy body mass index that met all inclusion criteria. After adjusting for maternal characteristics, women with class II (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.23), class III (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.49), and super obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.54) were all significantly more likely to have severe maternal morbidity than normal and overweight women. Super obesity was associated with specific severe maternal morbidity indicators, including renal failure, air and thrombotic embolism, blood transfusion, heart failure, and the need for mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: There is a significant dose-response relationship between increasing obesity class and the risk of severe maternal morbidity at delivery hospitalization. The risks of severe maternal morbidity are highest for women with super obesity. Given that this is a modifiable risk factor, women with prepregnancy obesity should be counseled on the specific risks associated with pregnancy before conception to optimize their pregnancy outcomes.

Severe cardiovascular morbidity in women with hypertensive diseases during delivery hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of pregnancy-related death in the United States. Identification of short-term indicators of cardiovascular morbidity has the potential to alter the course of this devastating disease among women. It has been established that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease 10-30 years after delivery; however, little is known about the association of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the immediate risk of cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization among women who experienced a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of women, 15-55 years old with a singleton gestation between 2008 and 2012 in New York City, examined the risk of severe cardiovascular morbidity in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with normotensive women during their delivery hospitalization. Women with a history of chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease were excluded. Mortality and severe cardiovascular morbidity (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, acute heart failure, heart failure or arrest during labor or procedure, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest and ventricular fibrillation, or conversion of cardiac rhythm) during the delivery hospitalization were identified using birth certificates and discharge record coding. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and severe cardiovascular morbidity, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic and pregnancy-specific clinical risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 569,900 women met inclusion criteria. Of those women, 39,624 (6.9%) had a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: 11,301 (1.9%) gestational hypertension; 16,117 (2.8%) preeclampsia without severe features; and 12,206 (2.1%) preeclampsia with severe features, of whom 319 (0.06%) had eclampsia. Among women with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 431 experienced severe cardiovascular morbidity (10.9 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 9.9-11.9). Among normotensive women, 1780 women experienced severe cardiovascular morbidity (3.4 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-3.5). Compared with normotensive women, there was a progressively increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity with gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.52), preeclampsia without severe features (adjusted odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-2.32), preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted odds ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-4.00), and eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, 12.46; 95% confidence interval, 7.69-20.22). Of the 39,624 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were 15 maternal deaths, 14 of which involved 1 or more cases of severe cardiovascular morbidity. CONCLUSION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, particularly preeclampsia with severe features and eclampsia, are significantly associated with cardiovascular morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Increased vigilance, including diligent screening for cardiac pathology in patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, may lead to decreased morbidity for mothers.

A comparison of prevaginal and postvaginal manipulation fetal fibronectin.

BACKGROUND: Fetal fibronectin (fFN) is used as a biomarker for preterm delivery. Currently, its use is discouraged if there has been vaginal manipulation in the previous 24 hours. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to determine if there are differences between fFN results before and after vaginal manipulation in the form of sterile vaginal exam or transvaginal ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational cohort study at a single center of women between 22-33 6/7 weeks at risk for preterm delivery due to: (1) a history of preterm delivery, short cervix, or multifetal gestation; or (2) symptoms of preterm labor. We excluded women with vaginal bleeding or infection, placenta previa, ruptured membranes, cervical dilation >3 cm, or any form of vaginal manipulation in the previous 24 hours. Specimen A was collected prior to planned vaginal exam or transvaginal ultrasound and specimen B was collected within 4 hours. The agreement between specimens A and B was assessed using descriptive statistics. Test characteristics of specimens A and B using the outcome of preterm delivery (<37 weeks) were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 310 specimen pairs from 237 women were collected. Specimen A was positive in 37 (12%) instances and negative in 273 (88%) while specimen B was positive in 39 (13%) and negative in 271 (87%). There were discordant results in 26 specimen pairs. Of these, 14 (5%) negative specimen A results subsequently became positive for specimen B, and 12 (32%) positive specimen A results became negative for specimen B. Overall, there was a 92% agreement between specimens A and B (confidence interval, 88-94%). The specificity of specimens A and B for preterm birth was 90% vs 89%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 87% for both. The false-negative rate was 12.8% for specimen A and 13.3% for specimen B. CONCLUSION: There is a moderately high degree of agreement between prevaginal and postvaginal manipulation fFN results. Their test characteristics for evaluating preterm birth are similar with strong specificity and negative predictive values, and their false-negative rates are not clinically different. Consideration should be made to the utilization of postvaginal manipulation fFN when a prevaginal manipulation specimen is not available.

Rotational and translational motion interact independently with form.

Do the mechanisms that underlie the perception of translational and rotational object motion show evidence of independent processing? By probing the perceived speed of translating and/or rotating objects, we find that an object's form contributes in independent ways to the processing of translational and rotational motion: In the context of translational motion, it has been shown that the more elongated an object is along its direction of motion, the faster it is perceived to translate; in the context of rotational motion, it has been shown that the sharper the maxima of curvature along an object's contour, the faster it appears to rotate. Here we demonstrate that such rotational form-motion interactions are due solely to the rotational component of combined rotational and translational motion. We conclude that the perception of rotational motion relies on form-motion interactions that are independent of the processing underlying translational motion.