Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The interpretation of the results of randomized clinical trials is often questioned in relation with daily circumstances in practices. This prospective observational multicenter study was instigated to reflect the need for information in real-life situations with dental implants with internal conical implant-abutment connection (Conelog implant system). The implants were followed up at least 5-year post-loading; survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier), changes of soft tissue, and bone level over time, as well as patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 130 dental implants were placed in 94 patients (64 female, 30 male). Mean age of patients was 50.4 ± 13.7. At 5-year post-loading, 104 implants in 76 patients were available for evaluation. The cumulative implant survival rate was 96.6%. After an initial bone remodeling process post-surgery (bone loss of - 0.52 ± 0.55 mm), the bone level change remained clinically stable from loading to 5-year post-loading (- 0.09 ± 0.43 mm). Patient satisfaction surveyed by questionnaire (comfort, ability to chew and taste, esthetics, general satisfaction) steadily increased towards the end. At the last study follow-up, all the patients rated their general satisfaction as either very satisfied (87.5%) or satisfied (12.5%). CONCLUSION: The study implants have shown to be highly effective with reliable peri-implant tissue stability over the 5 to 7 years of observation for both single tooth restorations and fixed partial dentures while used in standard conditions in daily dental practice. The results obtained are comparable with those obtained in controlled clinical trials.

A non-interventional multicenter study to document the implants success and survival rates in daily dental practices of the CONELOG screw-line implant.

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter prospective non-interventional study evaluated the success and survival of the CONELOG implants inserted according to the standard protocol with one- or two-step surgery in daily practice three years after loading. Changes of soft tissue and bone level over time, esthetical outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients in six centers. The implants were used in accordance with standard practice of each particular center, and the use was documented systematically. Failure rate, implant success, bone level changes, different clinical parameters, and patients' satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 130 dental implants were placed in 94 patients (64 female, 30 male). Mean age of patients was 50.4 ± 13.7. At 3-year post-loading, 108 implants in 78 patients were available for evaluation. Success and survival rate were 98.4% after placement and 100% 36 months post-loading. Bone loss from surgery to loading was 0.52 ± 0.55 mm. From loading to 36 months post-loading, the bone level change remained stable. Patient assessments were performed for function, ability to chew, speech, esthetics, and general satisfaction. Patients were very satisfied (82.3%) or satisfied (16.1%). None of the patients was dissatisfied. CONCLUSION: The 3-year results of this non-interventional multicenter study indicate that the CONELOG implants are reliable and effective over the course of the observation while used in standard conditions of daily environment and confirm the results obtained in controlled clinical trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performance of CONELOG implants under daily routine is similar to controlled clinical trials.

Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments.

BACKGROUND: The performance of dental implants in controlled clinical studies is often investigated in homogenous populations. Observational studies are necessary to evaluate the outcome of implant restorations placed in real-life situations, according to standard practice, and to assess the needs of the patients. The aim of this non-interventional study was to reveal the survival, success, and general performance of CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants and their restorations in daily dental practice. METHODS: Seventeen private practices across five countries participated in this prospective multicenter study. Patients received implants in the maxilla and mandible which were restored either with platform-matching or platform-switching abutments. Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years post-loading. Radiographs and clinical parameters were evaluated and patient satisfaction was evaluated. RESULTS: From a total of 196 patients planned, 185 patients with 271 implants were restored with abutments and fulfilled the follow-up inclusion criteria. Three implant failures were recorded, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.6% after 5 years post-loading. One persistent complication of peri-implantitis occurred. The soft tissue health remained stable, and the papilla height improved after loading. At 5-year follow-up, the mean crestal bone loss was - 0.28 ± 0.60 mm; over 99% of patients reported satisfaction with the restoration as excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed and restored with both platform-matching and platform-switching abutments in daily dental private practice achieved excellent clinical outcomes with highly satisfied patients after 5 years of function, confirming the results obtained in well-controlled clinical trials.

Extraction site management using a natural bone mineral containing collagen: rationale and retrospective case study.

Socket or ridge preservation is performed to maintain the contour of the alveolar ridge prior to conventional or implant-based prosthetic therapy. In this retrospective analysis of consecutive subjects, a natural bone mineral containing collagen was grafted into 110 sockets in 62 patients. The sites were left open to heal. Based on external measurements with a periodontal probe, the soft tissue volume and contour were largely preserved at all sites, irrespective of the initial defect morphology. Clinical advantages of this protocol include predictable preservation of the soft tissues, favorable healing characteristics, and easy handling of the material. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:489-497.).