Prediction of therapeutic intensity level from automatic multiclass segmentation of traumatic brain injury lesions on CT-scans.

The prediction of the therapeutic intensity level (TIL) for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients at the early phase of intensive care unit (ICU) remains challenging. Computed tomography images are still manually quantified and then underexploited. In this study, we develop an artificial intelligence-based tool to segment brain lesions on admission CT-scan and predict TIL within the first week in the ICU. A cohort of 29 head injured patients (87 CT-scans; Dataset1) was used to localize (using a structural atlas), segment (manually or automatically with or without transfer learning) 4 or 7 types of lesions and use these metrics to train classifiers, evaluated with AUC on a nested cross-validation, to predict requirements for TIL sum of 11 points or more during the 8 first days in ICU. The validation of the performances of both segmentation and classification tasks was done with Dice and accuracy scores on a sub-dataset of Dataset1 (internal validation) and an external dataset of 12 TBI patients (12 CT-scans; Dataset2). Automatic 4-class segmentation (without transfer learning) was not able to correctly predict the apparition of a day of extreme TIL (AUC = 60 ± 23%). In contrast, manual quantification of volumes of 7 lesions and their spatial location provided a significantly better prediction power (AUC = 89 ± 17%). Transfer learning significantly improved the automatic 4-class segmentation (DICE scores 0.63 vs 0.34) and trained more efficiently a 7-class convolutional neural network (DICE = 0.64). Both validations showed that segmentations based on transfer learning were able to predict extreme TIL with better or equivalent accuracy (83%) as those made with manual segmentations. Our automatic characterization (volume, type and spatial location) of initial brain lesions observed on CT-scan, publicly available on a dedicated computing platform, could predict requirements for high TIL during the first 8 days after severe TBI. Transfer learning strategies may improve the accuracy of CNN-based segmentation models.Trial registrations Radiomic-TBI cohort; NCT04058379, first posted: 15 august 2019; Radioxy-TC cohort; Health Data Hub index F20220207212747, first posted: 7 February 2022.

Radiomics-Based Detection of Radionecrosis Using Harmonized Multiparametric MRI.

In this study, a radiomics analysis was conducted to provide insights into the differentiation of radionecrosis and tumor progression in multiparametric MRI in the context of a multicentric clinical trial. First, the sensitivity of radiomic features to the unwanted variability caused by different protocol settings was assessed for each modality. Then, the ability of image normalization and ComBat-based harmonization to reduce the scanner-related variability was evaluated. Finally, the performances of several radiomic models dedicated to the classification of MRI examinations were measured. Our results showed that using radiomic models trained on harmonized data achieved better predictive performance for the investigated clinical outcome (balanced accuracy of 0.61 with the model based on raw data and 0.72 with ComBat harmonization). A comparison of several models based on information extracted from different MR modalities showed that the best classification accuracy was achieved with a model based on MR perfusion features in conjunction with clinical observation (balanced accuracy of 0.76 using LASSO feature selection and a Random Forest classifier). Although multimodality did not provide additional benefit in predictive power, the model based on T1-weighted MRI before injection provided an accuracy close to the performance achieved with perfusion.

What are normal relaxation times of tissues at 3 T?

The T1 and T2 relaxation times are the basic parameters behind magnetic resonance imaging. The accurate knowledge of the T1 and T2 values of tissues allows to perform quantitative imaging and to develop and optimize magnetic resonance sequences. A vast extent of methods and sequences has been developed to calculate the T1 and T2 relaxation times of different tissues in diverse centers. Surprisingly, a wide range of values has been reported for similar tissues (e.g. T1 of white matter from 699 to 1735ms and T2 of fat from 41 to 371ms), and the true values that represent each specific tissue are still unclear, which have deterred their common use in clinical diagnostic imaging. This article presents a comprehensive review of the reported relaxation times in the literature in vivo at 3T for a large span of tissues. It gives a detailed analysis of the different methods and sequences used to calculate the relaxation times, and it explains the reasons of the spread of reported relaxation times values in the literature.