ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Applause is a common behavior during simulation case learning sessions. Some simulation facilitators believe that this should not be allowed, arguing that it can mislead students when they make mistakes during simulation. This study was conducted to explore the opinions of students about spontaneous applause (initiated by the participants), as a habitual behavior in the simulation sessions, in the undergraduate and postgraduate nursing degrees. METHODS: A qualitative research study was conducted based on the content analysis of 7 focus groups composed of simulation students (N = 101, both undergraduate and graduate students). The participants were asked to conduct a debate about the following question: What is your opinion about the spontaneous applause given to participants by their peers at the completion of the scenario as they go to the debriefing, and why? An inductive method of content analysis was used to interpret the data. RESULTS: The majority considered applause as a sign of support; one student disapproved of the practice. For most participants, receiving spontaneous applause from their peers after finishing the simulation represented a spontaneous example of moral support that reduced the participants' stress. CONCLUSIONS: Applause within the context of clinical simulation is a motivational act, which should not be repressed by the facilitator, as long as it is a spontaneous and genuine act by the participants once the simulation experience ends.
Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Humans , Learning , Qualitative Research , Focus Groups , Students , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methodsABSTRACT
La infiltración de anestésico local (AL) está cada vez más extendida como indicación en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático. La intoxicación por AL es poco frecuente pero grave, potencialmente mortal y de difícil manejo. Cursa con afectación del nivel de conciencia, crisis comiciales y bloqueos de la conducción cardiaca. La emulsión lipídica (EL) al 20 % es el único tratamiento específico descrito hasta la fecha y ha mejorado el pronóstico de estos casos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con deterioro neurológico progresivo tras la infiltración de altas dosis de AL por un dolor neuropático refractario a otros tratamientos. El paciente fue tratado con emulsión lipídica al 20 % revirtiendo el cuadro neurológico de forma precoz y completa. La aparición de síntomas neurológicos progresivos en el contexto de una infiltración de anestésico local debe alertarnos sobre una posible intoxicación para iniciar tratamiento precoz con emulsión lipídica al 20 %, evitando un pronóstico infausto. Sin embargo, la prevención sigue siendo la herramienta principal.
The infiltration of local anesthetic (LA) is increasingly widespread as an indication in the treatment of neuropathic pain. AL poisoning is rare but serious, life-threatening entity and its management may be very difficult. It occurs with decreased level of consciousness, seizures and cardiac conduction blocks. The lipid emulsion (EL) 20% is the only specific treatment described to date and it has improved the prognosis of these patients. We report the case of a patient with progressive neurological deterioration after injection of high doses of LA for treat a neuropathic pain refractory to other treatments. The patient was treated with lipid emulsion 20% with reversing all the neurological symptoms early and completely. The occurrence of progressive neurological symptoms in the context of a local anesthetic infiltration, should alert us to a possible poisoning and to start early treatment with lipid emulsion 20%, to avoid poor prognosis. However, prevention remains the main tool.
