Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Public Health ; 113(12): 1254-1257, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824811

ABSTRACT

We used a collective impact model to form a statewide diabetes quality improvement collaborative to improve diabetes outcomes and advance diabetes health equity. Between 2020 and 2022, in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Medicaid, Medicaid Managed Care Plans, and Ohio's seven medical schools, we recruited 20 primary care practices across the state. The percentage of patients with hemoglobin A1c greater than 9% improved from 25% to 20% over two years. Applying our model more broadly could accelerate improvement in diabetes outcomes. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(12):1254-1257. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307410).


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Medicaid , United States , Humans , Ohio , Quality Improvement , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy
2.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 41(2): 62-74, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25976892

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sedation management, delirium monitoring, and mobility programs have been addressed in evidence-based critical care guidelines and care bundles, yet implementation in the ICU remains variable. As critically ill patients occupy higher percentages of hospital beds in the United States and beyond, it is increasingly important to determine mechanisms to deliver better care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Rethinking Critical Care (IHI-RCC) program was established to reduce harm of critically ill patients by decreasing sedation, increasing monitoring and management of delirium, and increasing patient mobility. Case studies of a convenience sample of five participating hospitals/health systems chosen in advance of the determination of their clinical outcomes are presented in terms of how they got started and process improvements in sedation management, delirium management, and mobility. METHODS: The IHI-RCC program involved one live case study and five iterations of an in-person seminar in a 33-month period (March 2011-November 2013) that emphasized interdisciplinary teamwork and culture change. RESULTS: Qualitative descriptions of the changes tested at each of the five case study sites demonstrate improvements in teamwork, processes, and reliability of daily work. Improvement in ICU length of stay and length of stay on the ventilator between the pre- and postimplementation periods varied from slight to substantial. CONCLUSION: Changing critical care practices requires an interdisciplinary approach addressing cultural, psychological, and practical issues. The key lessons of the IHI-RCC program are as follows: the importance of testing changes on a small scale, feeding back data regularly and providing sufficient education, and building will through seeing the work in action.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Delirium/therapy , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Pain Management/methods , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Walking , Delirium/diagnosis , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Length of Stay , Patient Care Bundles , Reproducibility of Results , Respiration, Artificial/methods , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...