Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 21(6S): S126-S143, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823941

ABSTRACT

Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Evidence-Based Medicine , Societies, Medical , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Female , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , United States , Mammography/standards , Mammography/methods , Risk Assessment , Mass Screening/methods
3.
Theriogenology ; 69(6): 700-13, 2008 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18258291

ABSTRACT

Clomiphene citrate (CC), a synthetic oestrogen, is often prescribed as a superovulator in treating infertility. Although CC works efficiently, pregnancy rates following CC treatment are approximately 10 times lower than "natural" rates. This study investigates how a dose of 1.25 mg CC given to ovariectomized rats before the implantation priming hormones (a single dose of progesterone for 3 days and a dose of estradiol-17beta on d3, P-P-PE), alters the expression and distribution of alpha-actinin, gelsolin and vinculin. Actin binding proteins show a specific distribution within the uterine epithelium during implantation, linking the actin cytoskeleton to integrin expression on the uterine surface and in this way aiding "adhesiveness" for blastocyst apposition to the uterine epithelium. In this study, immunocytochemistry on frozen uterine sections using mouse monoclonal antibodies against alpha-actinin, gelsolin and vinculin and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, show that CC, administered before the P-P-PE regimen, down-regulates the expression of vinculin, does not alter the expression of gelsolin and up-regulates alpha-actinin on the uterine apical surface, when compared to P-P-PE treated animals. All three proteins are down-regulated on the apical surface of the luminal epithelium and glands in all groups when compared to pregnant controls. Vinculin was only localized in the basolateral compartment of the uterine epithelial cells in the CC treated groups. By down-regulating these proteins on the uterine surface and up-regulating vinculin on the basolateral membrane of the epithelium, CC may impede adhesion and invasion of blastocysts at implantation. These results may aid the exogenous manipulation of uterine tissue to control fertility and improve assisted reproductive out-comes.


Subject(s)
Clomiphene/administration & dosage , Microfilament Proteins/analysis , Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Uterus/chemistry , Uterus/drug effects , Actinin/analysis , Animals , Epithelium/chemistry , Epithelium/drug effects , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Female , Gelsolin/analysis , Immunohistochemistry , Ovariectomy , Progesterone/administration & dosage , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Vinculin/analysis
4.
Pancreas ; 27(4): 286-90, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14576488

ABSTRACT

Although the association between alcohol and pancreatitis has been recognized for centuries, the precise magnitude of the impact of alcohol remains poorly quantified. Epidemiologic research on this condition has been seriously handicapped by several factors. Classifications are based on morphology rather than on etiology; the diagnostic differences between acute and chronic pancreatitis are imprecise and confusing; and coding by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) has been inadequate. The current ICD (ICD-10), used in the United States since 1999, identifies alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis as a separate code for the first time, an enhancement that will greatly improve the quality of data collected in current and future studies. Unfortunately, no code yet exists for acute alcoholic pancreatitis. Of the approximately 2.4 million deaths in the United States in 1999, pancreatitis was listed as the underlying cause for 3289 deaths, making it the 235th leading cause of death. Acute pancreatitis accounted for 84% of these deaths, and chronic pancreatitis the remaining 16%. Alcohol is a primary cause of both acute and chronic pancreatitis in most developed countries. About one-third of acute pancreatitis in the United States is alcohol-induced. In the United States and other developed countries, 60%-90% of chronic pancreatitis is alcohol induced. Both forms are more common in men. The development of chronic pancreatitis is proportional to the dose and duration of alcohol consumption (minimum, 6-12 years of approximately 80 g of alcohol per day). Autopsy studies reveal subclinical chronic pancreatitis in another 10% of alcohol abusers. Yet, since <10% of chronic alcoholics develop chronic pancreatitis, clearly other predisposing factors besides alcohol are involved. Genetic variability and environmental exposures, such as diet, are prime candidates for further investigation. To date, there have been few large epidemiological studies of alcoholic pancreatitis in the United States or other developed countries. Additional studies are needed to improve the quality of existing baseline epidemiologic data and allow better assessment of risk. Improved diagnostic precision, more complete and specific coding, and greater understanding of covariables and mechanisms would also advance the field.


Subject(s)
Pancreatitis, Alcoholic/epidemiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
Comput Inform Nurs ; 20(2): 46-52, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11984122

ABSTRACT

Computer interviewing to obtain sensitive information is not a new concept. However, concerns about the acceptance of computers in disadvantaged populations with potentially low literacy led us to combine audio- and touch-screen technologies with an audio computerized self-report interview to obtain information about alcohol use. This study evaluated acceptance and ease of use by a disadvantaged population of pregnant women in the District of Columbia. Patients attending an initial visit at prenatal clinics answered questions anonymously about their consumption of alcoholic beverages and other personal information. The questionnaire was programmed on a laptop computer. The computer administered the recorded questions via earphones, as well as displayed them on the screen, and patients answered by touching the computer screen. Results were immediately available. A total of 507 women were interviewed, who were primarily African American, non-Hispanic, and never married. Nearly 24% did not complete a high school education, 43% were unemployed, and 30% received public assistance. Most of the women (59%) used computers occasionally (a few days a month) or never. Nearly all patients (96%) reported that the computer was not difficult to use, and approximately 90% liked answering the questions by computer. The study demonstrates that using computers to screen for alcohol use in disadvantaged pregnant populations is feasible and acceptable to the patients.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Prenatal Care , User-Computer Interface , Adolescent , Adult , Demography , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...